Cargando…

Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability

Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Alyssa T., Retson, Tara, Wang, Junhao, Mantey, Richard, Chim, Chiyung, Karimabadi, Homa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694
_version_ 1785096009622224896
author Watanabe, Alyssa T.
Retson, Tara
Wang, Junhao
Mantey, Richard
Chim, Chiyung
Karimabadi, Homa
author_facet Watanabe, Alyssa T.
Retson, Tara
Wang, Junhao
Mantey, Richard
Chim, Chiyung
Karimabadi, Homa
author_sort Watanabe, Alyssa T.
collection PubMed
description Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisting of 928 image pairs and assessed for impact on inter- and intra-reader variability and reading time. Seven readers assigned density categories to the images, then re-read the test set aided by the model after a 4-week washout. To measure intra-reader agreement, 100 image pairs were blindly double read in both sessions. Linear Cohen Kappa (κ) and Student’s t-test were used to assess the model and reader performance. The model achieved a κ of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.89) for four-class density assessment and a κ of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93) for binary non-dense/dense assessment. Superiority tests showed significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.70 to 0.88, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.83 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01) for four-class density, and significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.77 to 0.96, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.89 to 0.97, p ≤ 0.01) for binary non-dense/dense assessment when aided by DL. The average reader mean reading time per image pair also decreased by 30%, 0.86 s (95% CI: 0.01, 1.71), with six of seven readers having reading time reductions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10453732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104537322023-08-26 Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability Watanabe, Alyssa T. Retson, Tara Wang, Junhao Mantey, Richard Chim, Chiyung Karimabadi, Homa Diagnostics (Basel) Article Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisting of 928 image pairs and assessed for impact on inter- and intra-reader variability and reading time. Seven readers assigned density categories to the images, then re-read the test set aided by the model after a 4-week washout. To measure intra-reader agreement, 100 image pairs were blindly double read in both sessions. Linear Cohen Kappa (κ) and Student’s t-test were used to assess the model and reader performance. The model achieved a κ of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.89) for four-class density assessment and a κ of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93) for binary non-dense/dense assessment. Superiority tests showed significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.70 to 0.88, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.83 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01) for four-class density, and significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.77 to 0.96, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.89 to 0.97, p ≤ 0.01) for binary non-dense/dense assessment when aided by DL. The average reader mean reading time per image pair also decreased by 30%, 0.86 s (95% CI: 0.01, 1.71), with six of seven readers having reading time reductions. MDPI 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10453732/ /pubmed/37627953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Watanabe, Alyssa T.
Retson, Tara
Wang, Junhao
Mantey, Richard
Chim, Chiyung
Karimabadi, Homa
Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
title Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
title_full Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
title_fullStr Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
title_full_unstemmed Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
title_short Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
title_sort mammographic breast density model using semi-supervised learning reduces inter-/intra-reader variability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabealyssat mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability
AT retsontara mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability
AT wangjunhao mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability
AT manteyrichard mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability
AT chimchiyung mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability
AT karimabadihoma mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability