Cargando…
Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability
Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694 |
_version_ | 1785096009622224896 |
---|---|
author | Watanabe, Alyssa T. Retson, Tara Wang, Junhao Mantey, Richard Chim, Chiyung Karimabadi, Homa |
author_facet | Watanabe, Alyssa T. Retson, Tara Wang, Junhao Mantey, Richard Chim, Chiyung Karimabadi, Homa |
author_sort | Watanabe, Alyssa T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisting of 928 image pairs and assessed for impact on inter- and intra-reader variability and reading time. Seven readers assigned density categories to the images, then re-read the test set aided by the model after a 4-week washout. To measure intra-reader agreement, 100 image pairs were blindly double read in both sessions. Linear Cohen Kappa (κ) and Student’s t-test were used to assess the model and reader performance. The model achieved a κ of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.89) for four-class density assessment and a κ of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93) for binary non-dense/dense assessment. Superiority tests showed significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.70 to 0.88, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.83 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01) for four-class density, and significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.77 to 0.96, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.89 to 0.97, p ≤ 0.01) for binary non-dense/dense assessment when aided by DL. The average reader mean reading time per image pair also decreased by 30%, 0.86 s (95% CI: 0.01, 1.71), with six of seven readers having reading time reductions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10453732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104537322023-08-26 Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability Watanabe, Alyssa T. Retson, Tara Wang, Junhao Mantey, Richard Chim, Chiyung Karimabadi, Homa Diagnostics (Basel) Article Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisting of 928 image pairs and assessed for impact on inter- and intra-reader variability and reading time. Seven readers assigned density categories to the images, then re-read the test set aided by the model after a 4-week washout. To measure intra-reader agreement, 100 image pairs were blindly double read in both sessions. Linear Cohen Kappa (κ) and Student’s t-test were used to assess the model and reader performance. The model achieved a κ of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.89) for four-class density assessment and a κ of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93) for binary non-dense/dense assessment. Superiority tests showed significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.70 to 0.88, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.83 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01) for four-class density, and significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.77 to 0.96, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.89 to 0.97, p ≤ 0.01) for binary non-dense/dense assessment when aided by DL. The average reader mean reading time per image pair also decreased by 30%, 0.86 s (95% CI: 0.01, 1.71), with six of seven readers having reading time reductions. MDPI 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10453732/ /pubmed/37627953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Watanabe, Alyssa T. Retson, Tara Wang, Junhao Mantey, Richard Chim, Chiyung Karimabadi, Homa Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability |
title | Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability |
title_full | Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability |
title_fullStr | Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability |
title_short | Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability |
title_sort | mammographic breast density model using semi-supervised learning reduces inter-/intra-reader variability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watanabealyssat mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability AT retsontara mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability AT wangjunhao mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability AT manteyrichard mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability AT chimchiyung mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability AT karimabadihoma mammographicbreastdensitymodelusingsemisupervisedlearningreducesinterintrareadervariability |