Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients

The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemotherapy for locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okamoto, Takeshi, Takeda, Tsuyoshi, Sasaki, Takashi, Hamada, Tsuyoshi, Mie, Takafumi, Ishitsuka, Takahiro, Yamada, Manabu, Nakagawa, Hiroki, Hirai, Tatsuki, Furukawa, Takaaki, Kasuga, Akiyoshi, Ozaka, Masato, Sasahira, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080524
_version_ 1785096051609305088
author Okamoto, Takeshi
Takeda, Tsuyoshi
Sasaki, Takashi
Hamada, Tsuyoshi
Mie, Takafumi
Ishitsuka, Takahiro
Yamada, Manabu
Nakagawa, Hiroki
Hirai, Tatsuki
Furukawa, Takaaki
Kasuga, Akiyoshi
Ozaka, Masato
Sasahira, Naoki
author_facet Okamoto, Takeshi
Takeda, Tsuyoshi
Sasaki, Takashi
Hamada, Tsuyoshi
Mie, Takafumi
Ishitsuka, Takahiro
Yamada, Manabu
Nakagawa, Hiroki
Hirai, Tatsuki
Furukawa, Takaaki
Kasuga, Akiyoshi
Ozaka, Masato
Sasahira, Naoki
author_sort Okamoto, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemotherapy for locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Of the 283 included patients, 91 (32.5%) were aged 75 years or older when initiating chemotherapy. Elderly patients were more likely than non-elderly patients to receive monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 (58.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience grade 3–4 toxicities (55.4% vs. 70.2%, p = 0.015). The rates of termination due to intolerance (6.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.800) and transition to second-line chemotherapy (39.1% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.849) were similar between groups. In the overall cohort, age was not an independent predictor of overall survival (OS). Within the elderly cohort, there were no differences in severe adverse events between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy (50.0% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.211). Median OS was longer in the combination therapy group (10.4 vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.010); however, choice of monotherapy was not an independent predictor of overall survival. Monotherapy appears to be a viable alternative in selected elderly BTC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10453877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104538772023-08-26 Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Okamoto, Takeshi Takeda, Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Takashi Hamada, Tsuyoshi Mie, Takafumi Ishitsuka, Takahiro Yamada, Manabu Nakagawa, Hiroki Hirai, Tatsuki Furukawa, Takaaki Kasuga, Akiyoshi Ozaka, Masato Sasahira, Naoki Curr Oncol Article The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemotherapy for locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Of the 283 included patients, 91 (32.5%) were aged 75 years or older when initiating chemotherapy. Elderly patients were more likely than non-elderly patients to receive monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 (58.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience grade 3–4 toxicities (55.4% vs. 70.2%, p = 0.015). The rates of termination due to intolerance (6.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.800) and transition to second-line chemotherapy (39.1% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.849) were similar between groups. In the overall cohort, age was not an independent predictor of overall survival (OS). Within the elderly cohort, there were no differences in severe adverse events between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy (50.0% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.211). Median OS was longer in the combination therapy group (10.4 vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.010); however, choice of monotherapy was not an independent predictor of overall survival. Monotherapy appears to be a viable alternative in selected elderly BTC patients. MDPI 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10453877/ /pubmed/37623005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080524 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Okamoto, Takeshi
Takeda, Tsuyoshi
Sasaki, Takashi
Hamada, Tsuyoshi
Mie, Takafumi
Ishitsuka, Takahiro
Yamada, Manabu
Nakagawa, Hiroki
Hirai, Tatsuki
Furukawa, Takaaki
Kasuga, Akiyoshi
Ozaka, Masato
Sasahira, Naoki
Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients
title Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients
title_sort safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly biliary tract cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080524
work_keys_str_mv AT okamototakeshi safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT takedatsuyoshi safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT sasakitakashi safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT hamadatsuyoshi safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT mietakafumi safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT ishitsukatakahiro safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT yamadamanabu safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT nakagawahiroki safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT hiraitatsuki safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT furukawatakaaki safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT kasugaakiyoshi safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT ozakamasato safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients
AT sasahiranaoki safetyandeffectivenessofchemotherapyinelderlybiliarytractcancerpatients