Cargando…

Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study

Declining proprioceptive function is associated with problems such as lower back pain and falls. Therefore, we developed a vibration device using sweep frequency to evaluate several proprioceptors with different response frequency ranges. This study aimed to elucidate the biological responses of hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawai, Keitaro, Kato, Yoshiji, Ito, Tadashi, Yamazaki, Kazunori, Fukuhara, Jo, Sakai, Yoshihito, Morita, Yoshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37628441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162243
_version_ 1785096106894426112
author Kawai, Keitaro
Kato, Yoshiji
Ito, Tadashi
Yamazaki, Kazunori
Fukuhara, Jo
Sakai, Yoshihito
Morita, Yoshifumi
author_facet Kawai, Keitaro
Kato, Yoshiji
Ito, Tadashi
Yamazaki, Kazunori
Fukuhara, Jo
Sakai, Yoshihito
Morita, Yoshifumi
author_sort Kawai, Keitaro
collection PubMed
description Declining proprioceptive function is associated with problems such as lower back pain and falls. Therefore, we developed a vibration device using sweep frequency to evaluate several proprioceptors with different response frequency ranges. This study aimed to elucidate the biological responses of healthy individuals to vibratory stimulation at different sites and frequency ranges and to propose cutoff values to determine the decline in proprioceptive function. Mechanical vibration was separately applied to the lower legs and lower back, and proprioceptive function was evaluated by defining the ratio of the center of pressure (CoP) in the anteroposterior direction during mechanical vibration to that during no vibration in the three frequency ranges. The cut-off value was defined as the mean value, with the standard deviation subtracted for each indicator. The cut-off values were higher in the lower legs than in the lower back at all frequency ranges and in the 30–53 Hz and 56–100 Hz frequency ranges for both the lower legs and lower back. In healthy individuals, 9.9% and 8.6% were below the cut-off values in the 30–53 Hz and 56–100 Hz frequency ranges for the lower legs, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10454103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104541032023-08-26 Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study Kawai, Keitaro Kato, Yoshiji Ito, Tadashi Yamazaki, Kazunori Fukuhara, Jo Sakai, Yoshihito Morita, Yoshifumi Healthcare (Basel) Article Declining proprioceptive function is associated with problems such as lower back pain and falls. Therefore, we developed a vibration device using sweep frequency to evaluate several proprioceptors with different response frequency ranges. This study aimed to elucidate the biological responses of healthy individuals to vibratory stimulation at different sites and frequency ranges and to propose cutoff values to determine the decline in proprioceptive function. Mechanical vibration was separately applied to the lower legs and lower back, and proprioceptive function was evaluated by defining the ratio of the center of pressure (CoP) in the anteroposterior direction during mechanical vibration to that during no vibration in the three frequency ranges. The cut-off value was defined as the mean value, with the standard deviation subtracted for each indicator. The cut-off values were higher in the lower legs than in the lower back at all frequency ranges and in the 30–53 Hz and 56–100 Hz frequency ranges for both the lower legs and lower back. In healthy individuals, 9.9% and 8.6% were below the cut-off values in the 30–53 Hz and 56–100 Hz frequency ranges for the lower legs, respectively. MDPI 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10454103/ /pubmed/37628441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162243 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kawai, Keitaro
Kato, Yoshiji
Ito, Tadashi
Yamazaki, Kazunori
Fukuhara, Jo
Sakai, Yoshihito
Morita, Yoshifumi
Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study
title Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study
title_full Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study
title_short Biological Responses to Local Vibratory Stimulation for the Lower Legs and Lower Back and Criterion Values Based on Sweep Frequencies of Healthy Individuals: An Observational Study
title_sort biological responses to local vibratory stimulation for the lower legs and lower back and criterion values based on sweep frequencies of healthy individuals: an observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37628441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162243
work_keys_str_mv AT kawaikeitaro biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy
AT katoyoshiji biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy
AT itotadashi biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy
AT yamazakikazunori biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy
AT fukuharajo biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy
AT sakaiyoshihito biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy
AT moritayoshifumi biologicalresponsestolocalvibratorystimulationforthelowerlegsandlowerbackandcriterionvaluesbasedonsweepfrequenciesofhealthyindividualsanobservationalstudy