Cargando…
Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies
The designs of in vivo, in vitro and in silico studies do not adequately reflect the characteristics of long-term occupational EMF exposure; the higher exposure levels permitted for employees are nevertheless extrapolated on this basis. Epidemiological studies consider occupational exposure only in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166552 |
_version_ | 1785096144546693120 |
---|---|
author | Hansson Mild, Kjell Mattsson, Mats-Olof Jeschke, Peter Israel, Michel Ivanova, Mihaela Shalamanova, Tsvetelina |
author_facet | Hansson Mild, Kjell Mattsson, Mats-Olof Jeschke, Peter Israel, Michel Ivanova, Mihaela Shalamanova, Tsvetelina |
author_sort | Hansson Mild, Kjell |
collection | PubMed |
description | The designs of in vivo, in vitro and in silico studies do not adequately reflect the characteristics of long-term occupational EMF exposure; the higher exposure levels permitted for employees are nevertheless extrapolated on this basis. Epidemiological studies consider occupational exposure only in a very general way, if at all. There is a lack of detailed descriptive data on long-term occupational exposure over the duration of the working life. Most studies reflect exposure characteristics of the general population, exposures which are long-term, but at a comparably low level. Occupational exposure is often intermittent with high peak power followed by periods with no exposure. Furthermore, the EU EMF-Directive 2013/35/EU states a demand for occupational health surveillance, the outcome of which would be of great help to epidemiologists studying the health effects of EMF exposure. This paper thus aims to outline and specify differences between public and occupational exposure and to increase the understanding of specific aspects of occupational exposure which are important for long-term health considerations. This could lead to a future protection concept against possible hazards based on adequate descriptions of long-term exposures and also include supplementary descriptive features such as a “reset time” of biological systems and accurate dose quantities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10454245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104542452023-08-26 Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies Hansson Mild, Kjell Mattsson, Mats-Olof Jeschke, Peter Israel, Michel Ivanova, Mihaela Shalamanova, Tsvetelina Int J Environ Res Public Health Communication The designs of in vivo, in vitro and in silico studies do not adequately reflect the characteristics of long-term occupational EMF exposure; the higher exposure levels permitted for employees are nevertheless extrapolated on this basis. Epidemiological studies consider occupational exposure only in a very general way, if at all. There is a lack of detailed descriptive data on long-term occupational exposure over the duration of the working life. Most studies reflect exposure characteristics of the general population, exposures which are long-term, but at a comparably low level. Occupational exposure is often intermittent with high peak power followed by periods with no exposure. Furthermore, the EU EMF-Directive 2013/35/EU states a demand for occupational health surveillance, the outcome of which would be of great help to epidemiologists studying the health effects of EMF exposure. This paper thus aims to outline and specify differences between public and occupational exposure and to increase the understanding of specific aspects of occupational exposure which are important for long-term health considerations. This could lead to a future protection concept against possible hazards based on adequate descriptions of long-term exposures and also include supplementary descriptive features such as a “reset time” of biological systems and accurate dose quantities. MDPI 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10454245/ /pubmed/37623138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166552 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Hansson Mild, Kjell Mattsson, Mats-Olof Jeschke, Peter Israel, Michel Ivanova, Mihaela Shalamanova, Tsvetelina Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies |
title | Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies |
title_full | Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies |
title_fullStr | Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies |
title_short | Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields—Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies |
title_sort | occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields—different from general public exposure and laboratory studies |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanssonmildkjell occupationalexposuretoelectromagneticfieldsdifferentfromgeneralpublicexposureandlaboratorystudies AT mattssonmatsolof occupationalexposuretoelectromagneticfieldsdifferentfromgeneralpublicexposureandlaboratorystudies AT jeschkepeter occupationalexposuretoelectromagneticfieldsdifferentfromgeneralpublicexposureandlaboratorystudies AT israelmichel occupationalexposuretoelectromagneticfieldsdifferentfromgeneralpublicexposureandlaboratorystudies AT ivanovamihaela occupationalexposuretoelectromagneticfieldsdifferentfromgeneralpublicexposureandlaboratorystudies AT shalamanovatsvetelina occupationalexposuretoelectromagneticfieldsdifferentfromgeneralpublicexposureandlaboratorystudies |