Cargando…

Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review

Background: Unconscious biases are one of the causes of health disparities. Health professionals have prejudices against patients due to their race, gender, or other factors without their conscious knowledge. This review aimed to provide an overview of research on unconscious bias among health profe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meidert, Ursula, Dönnges, Godela, Bucher, Thomas, Wieber, Frank, Gerber-Grote, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166569
_version_ 1785096239218425856
author Meidert, Ursula
Dönnges, Godela
Bucher, Thomas
Wieber, Frank
Gerber-Grote, Andreas
author_facet Meidert, Ursula
Dönnges, Godela
Bucher, Thomas
Wieber, Frank
Gerber-Grote, Andreas
author_sort Meidert, Ursula
collection PubMed
description Background: Unconscious biases are one of the causes of health disparities. Health professionals have prejudices against patients due to their race, gender, or other factors without their conscious knowledge. This review aimed to provide an overview of research on unconscious bias among health professionals and to investigate the biases that exist in different regions of the world, the health professions that are considered, and the research gaps that still exist. Methods: We conducted a scoping review by systematically searching PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and AMED. All records were double-screened and included if they were published between 2011 and 2021. Results: A total of 5186 records were found. After removing duplicates (n = 300), screening titles and abstracts (n = 4210), and full-text screening (n = 695), 87 articles from 81 studies remained. Studies originated from North America (n = 60), Europe (n = 13), and the rest of the world (n = 6), and two studies were of global scope. Racial bias was investigated most frequently (n = 46), followed by gender bias (n = 11), weight bias (n = 10), socio-economic status bias (n = 9), and mental illness bias (n = 7). Most of the studies were conducted by physicians (n = 51) and nurses (n = 20). Other health care professionals were rarely included in these studies. Conclusions: Most studies show that health professionals have an implicit bias. Racial biases among physicians and nurses in the USA are well confirmed. Research is missing on other biases from other regions and other health professions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10454622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104546222023-08-26 Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review Meidert, Ursula Dönnges, Godela Bucher, Thomas Wieber, Frank Gerber-Grote, Andreas Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Unconscious biases are one of the causes of health disparities. Health professionals have prejudices against patients due to their race, gender, or other factors without their conscious knowledge. This review aimed to provide an overview of research on unconscious bias among health professionals and to investigate the biases that exist in different regions of the world, the health professions that are considered, and the research gaps that still exist. Methods: We conducted a scoping review by systematically searching PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and AMED. All records were double-screened and included if they were published between 2011 and 2021. Results: A total of 5186 records were found. After removing duplicates (n = 300), screening titles and abstracts (n = 4210), and full-text screening (n = 695), 87 articles from 81 studies remained. Studies originated from North America (n = 60), Europe (n = 13), and the rest of the world (n = 6), and two studies were of global scope. Racial bias was investigated most frequently (n = 46), followed by gender bias (n = 11), weight bias (n = 10), socio-economic status bias (n = 9), and mental illness bias (n = 7). Most of the studies were conducted by physicians (n = 51) and nurses (n = 20). Other health care professionals were rarely included in these studies. Conclusions: Most studies show that health professionals have an implicit bias. Racial biases among physicians and nurses in the USA are well confirmed. Research is missing on other biases from other regions and other health professions. MDPI 2023-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10454622/ /pubmed/37623155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166569 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Meidert, Ursula
Dönnges, Godela
Bucher, Thomas
Wieber, Frank
Gerber-Grote, Andreas
Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
title Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
title_full Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
title_short Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
title_sort unconscious bias among health professionals: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166569
work_keys_str_mv AT meidertursula unconsciousbiasamonghealthprofessionalsascopingreview
AT donngesgodela unconsciousbiasamonghealthprofessionalsascopingreview
AT bucherthomas unconsciousbiasamonghealthprofessionalsascopingreview
AT wieberfrank unconsciousbiasamonghealthprofessionalsascopingreview
AT gerbergroteandreas unconsciousbiasamonghealthprofessionalsascopingreview