Cargando…
Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables
Knowledge of reference values for cervical muscle strength is a key tool for clinicians to use as a clinical reference measure and to establish goals during rehabilitation. The objective was to establish reference values for the maximal strength of cervical muscles in healthy women using a handheld...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37628476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162278 |
_version_ | 1785096258811068416 |
---|---|
author | Gorla, Camila Martins, Taís de Souza Florencio, Lidiane Lima Pinheiro-Araújo, Carina Ferreira Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César Martins, Jaqueline Bevilaqua-Grossi, Débora |
author_facet | Gorla, Camila Martins, Taís de Souza Florencio, Lidiane Lima Pinheiro-Araújo, Carina Ferreira Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César Martins, Jaqueline Bevilaqua-Grossi, Débora |
author_sort | Gorla, Camila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowledge of reference values for cervical muscle strength is a key tool for clinicians to use as a clinical reference measure and to establish goals during rehabilitation. The objective was to establish reference values for the maximal strength of cervical muscles in healthy women using a handheld dynamometer and verify the association of cervical muscle strength with age and anthropometric measurements. A hundred women were classified into four groups (n = 25) according to age: 18–29 years, 30–39 years, 40–49 years, and 50–60 years. Maximal muscle strength of the cervical spine was measured using a Lafayette(®) handheld dynamometer for flexion, extension, and bilateral lateral flexion. No differences in cervical muscle strength were observed among the groups (p > 0.05). However, the 18–29-year-old group took less time to reach the peak of force for flexion than the 50–60-year-old group. Moderate correlations were observed between cervical flexor strength and weight, body mass index, and neck circumference, and between cervical extensor strength and weight and body mass index (r = 0.43–0.55; p < 0.05). Reference values for cervical muscle strength in healthy women were established using a handheld dynamometer, and the association between muscle strength and anthropometric data was moderate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10454699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104546992023-08-26 Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables Gorla, Camila Martins, Taís de Souza Florencio, Lidiane Lima Pinheiro-Araújo, Carina Ferreira Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César Martins, Jaqueline Bevilaqua-Grossi, Débora Healthcare (Basel) Article Knowledge of reference values for cervical muscle strength is a key tool for clinicians to use as a clinical reference measure and to establish goals during rehabilitation. The objective was to establish reference values for the maximal strength of cervical muscles in healthy women using a handheld dynamometer and verify the association of cervical muscle strength with age and anthropometric measurements. A hundred women were classified into four groups (n = 25) according to age: 18–29 years, 30–39 years, 40–49 years, and 50–60 years. Maximal muscle strength of the cervical spine was measured using a Lafayette(®) handheld dynamometer for flexion, extension, and bilateral lateral flexion. No differences in cervical muscle strength were observed among the groups (p > 0.05). However, the 18–29-year-old group took less time to reach the peak of force for flexion than the 50–60-year-old group. Moderate correlations were observed between cervical flexor strength and weight, body mass index, and neck circumference, and between cervical extensor strength and weight and body mass index (r = 0.43–0.55; p < 0.05). Reference values for cervical muscle strength in healthy women were established using a handheld dynamometer, and the association between muscle strength and anthropometric data was moderate. MDPI 2023-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10454699/ /pubmed/37628476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162278 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gorla, Camila Martins, Taís de Souza Florencio, Lidiane Lima Pinheiro-Araújo, Carina Ferreira Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César Martins, Jaqueline Bevilaqua-Grossi, Débora Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables |
title | Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables |
title_full | Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables |
title_fullStr | Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables |
title_short | Reference Values for Cervical Muscle Strength in Healthy Women Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer and the Association with Age and Anthropometric Variables |
title_sort | reference values for cervical muscle strength in healthy women using a hand-held dynamometer and the association with age and anthropometric variables |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37628476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorlacamila referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables AT martinstaisdesouza referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables AT florenciolidianelima referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables AT pinheiroaraujocarinaferreira referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables AT fernandezdelaspenascesar referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables AT martinsjaqueline referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables AT bevilaquagrossidebora referencevaluesforcervicalmusclestrengthinhealthywomenusingahandhelddynamometerandtheassociationwithageandanthropometricvariables |