Cargando…

Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump

Previous researches has shown that inlet backflow may occur in a centrifugal pump when running at low-flow-rate conditions and have nonnegligible effects on cavitation behaviors (e.g. mass flow gain factor) and cavitation stability (e.g. cavitation surge). To analyze the influences of backflow in im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Wenzhe, Zhou, Lingjiu, Liu, Dianhai, Wang, Zhengwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0036850421998865
_version_ 1785096283319435264
author Kang, Wenzhe
Zhou, Lingjiu
Liu, Dianhai
Wang, Zhengwei
author_facet Kang, Wenzhe
Zhou, Lingjiu
Liu, Dianhai
Wang, Zhengwei
author_sort Kang, Wenzhe
collection PubMed
description Previous researches has shown that inlet backflow may occur in a centrifugal pump when running at low-flow-rate conditions and have nonnegligible effects on cavitation behaviors (e.g. mass flow gain factor) and cavitation stability (e.g. cavitation surge). To analyze the influences of backflow in impeller inlet, comparative studies of cavitating flows are carried out for two typical centrifugal pumps. A series of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out for the cavitating flows in two pumps, based on the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Naiver-Stokes) solver with the turbulence model of k-ω shear stress transport and homogeneous multiphase model. The cavity volume in Pump A (with less reversed flow in impeller inlet) decreases with the decreasing of flow rate, while the cavity volume in Pump B (with obvious inlet backflow) reach the minimum values at δ = 0.1285 and then increase as the flow rate decreases. For Pump A, the mass flow gain factors are negative and the absolute values increase with the decrease of cavitation number for all calculation conditions. For Pump B, the mass flow gain factors are negative for most conditions but positive for some conditions with low flow rate coefficients and low cavitation numbers, reaching the minimum value at condition of σ = 0.151 for most cases. The development of backflow in impeller inlet is found to be the essential reason for the great differences. For Pump B, the strong shearing between backflow and main flow lead to the cavitation in inlet tube. The cavity volume in the impeller decreases while that in the inlet tube increases with the decreasing of flow rate, which make the total cavity volume reaches the minimum value at δ = 0.1285 and then the mass flow gain factor become positive. Through the transient calculations for cavitating flows in two pumps, low-frequency fluctuations of pressure and flow rate are found in Pump B at some off-designed conditions (e.g. δ = 0.107, σ = 0.195). The relations among inlet pressure, inlet flow rate, cavity volume, and backflow are analyzed in detail to understand the periodic evolution of low-frequency fluctuations. Backflow is found to be the main reason which cause the positive value of mass flow gain factor at low-flow-rate conditions. Through the transient simulations of cavitating flow, backflow is considered as an important aspect closely related to the hydraulic stability of cavitating pumping system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10454783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104547832023-08-26 Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump Kang, Wenzhe Zhou, Lingjiu Liu, Dianhai Wang, Zhengwei Sci Prog Article Previous researches has shown that inlet backflow may occur in a centrifugal pump when running at low-flow-rate conditions and have nonnegligible effects on cavitation behaviors (e.g. mass flow gain factor) and cavitation stability (e.g. cavitation surge). To analyze the influences of backflow in impeller inlet, comparative studies of cavitating flows are carried out for two typical centrifugal pumps. A series of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out for the cavitating flows in two pumps, based on the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Naiver-Stokes) solver with the turbulence model of k-ω shear stress transport and homogeneous multiphase model. The cavity volume in Pump A (with less reversed flow in impeller inlet) decreases with the decreasing of flow rate, while the cavity volume in Pump B (with obvious inlet backflow) reach the minimum values at δ = 0.1285 and then increase as the flow rate decreases. For Pump A, the mass flow gain factors are negative and the absolute values increase with the decrease of cavitation number for all calculation conditions. For Pump B, the mass flow gain factors are negative for most conditions but positive for some conditions with low flow rate coefficients and low cavitation numbers, reaching the minimum value at condition of σ = 0.151 for most cases. The development of backflow in impeller inlet is found to be the essential reason for the great differences. For Pump B, the strong shearing between backflow and main flow lead to the cavitation in inlet tube. The cavity volume in the impeller decreases while that in the inlet tube increases with the decreasing of flow rate, which make the total cavity volume reaches the minimum value at δ = 0.1285 and then the mass flow gain factor become positive. Through the transient calculations for cavitating flows in two pumps, low-frequency fluctuations of pressure and flow rate are found in Pump B at some off-designed conditions (e.g. δ = 0.107, σ = 0.195). The relations among inlet pressure, inlet flow rate, cavity volume, and backflow are analyzed in detail to understand the periodic evolution of low-frequency fluctuations. Backflow is found to be the main reason which cause the positive value of mass flow gain factor at low-flow-rate conditions. Through the transient simulations of cavitating flow, backflow is considered as an important aspect closely related to the hydraulic stability of cavitating pumping system. SAGE Publications 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10454783/ /pubmed/33890814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0036850421998865 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Wenzhe
Zhou, Lingjiu
Liu, Dianhai
Wang, Zhengwei
Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
title Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
title_full Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
title_fullStr Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
title_full_unstemmed Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
title_short Backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
title_sort backflow effects on mass flow gain factor in a centrifugal pump
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0036850421998865
work_keys_str_mv AT kangwenzhe backfloweffectsonmassflowgainfactorinacentrifugalpump
AT zhoulingjiu backfloweffectsonmassflowgainfactorinacentrifugalpump
AT liudianhai backfloweffectsonmassflowgainfactorinacentrifugalpump
AT wangzhengwei backfloweffectsonmassflowgainfactorinacentrifugalpump