Cargando…

Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review

Introduction: Mentoring programs minimize stress and anxiety in recent graduates and in newly recruited nurses, guiding their careers and enabling them to retain their skills and correctly care for patients. The objective of this scoping review is to explore and summarize the existing literature on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mínguez Moreno, Inmaculada, González de la Cuesta, Delia, Barrado Narvión, María Jesús, Arnaldos Esteban, Marta, González Cantalejo, Mar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37628500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162302
_version_ 1785096318991990784
author Mínguez Moreno, Inmaculada
González de la Cuesta, Delia
Barrado Narvión, María Jesús
Arnaldos Esteban, Marta
González Cantalejo, Mar
author_facet Mínguez Moreno, Inmaculada
González de la Cuesta, Delia
Barrado Narvión, María Jesús
Arnaldos Esteban, Marta
González Cantalejo, Mar
author_sort Mínguez Moreno, Inmaculada
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Mentoring programs minimize stress and anxiety in recent graduates and in newly recruited nurses, guiding their careers and enabling them to retain their skills and correctly care for patients. The objective of this scoping review is to explore and summarize the existing literature on mentoring models and programs in the clinical nursing context. Methods: The databases searched include PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Cuiden, Scielo, MEDES, OpenGrey, Trove and MedNar. Published and unpublished studies worldwide that included nurse mentoring programs in a clinical context, in public and private systems and primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings, and articles published in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese, were included. Nurse students and training specialists were excluded. The papers were screened by two independent reviewers. In cases of discrepancy, a third reviewer made the decision. Results: Eleven studies were included. Most of them were conducted in the USA. A wide range of nurse mentoring programs were identified with highly variable characteristics. The duration of the programs and the evaluation systems were different, but the expected results matched. Conclusions: Mentoring programs need more in-depth and extensive study. In spite of their differences, they all lead to improvements for nurses, patients and organizations. A gender influence was found in our results, which could be studied in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10454917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104549172023-08-26 Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review Mínguez Moreno, Inmaculada González de la Cuesta, Delia Barrado Narvión, María Jesús Arnaldos Esteban, Marta González Cantalejo, Mar Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review Introduction: Mentoring programs minimize stress and anxiety in recent graduates and in newly recruited nurses, guiding their careers and enabling them to retain their skills and correctly care for patients. The objective of this scoping review is to explore and summarize the existing literature on mentoring models and programs in the clinical nursing context. Methods: The databases searched include PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Cuiden, Scielo, MEDES, OpenGrey, Trove and MedNar. Published and unpublished studies worldwide that included nurse mentoring programs in a clinical context, in public and private systems and primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings, and articles published in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese, were included. Nurse students and training specialists were excluded. The papers were screened by two independent reviewers. In cases of discrepancy, a third reviewer made the decision. Results: Eleven studies were included. Most of them were conducted in the USA. A wide range of nurse mentoring programs were identified with highly variable characteristics. The duration of the programs and the evaluation systems were different, but the expected results matched. Conclusions: Mentoring programs need more in-depth and extensive study. In spite of their differences, they all lead to improvements for nurses, patients and organizations. A gender influence was found in our results, which could be studied in future research. MDPI 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10454917/ /pubmed/37628500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162302 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Mínguez Moreno, Inmaculada
González de la Cuesta, Delia
Barrado Narvión, María Jesús
Arnaldos Esteban, Marta
González Cantalejo, Mar
Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review
title Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review
title_full Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review
title_short Nurse Mentoring: A Scoping Review
title_sort nurse mentoring: a scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10454917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37628500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162302
work_keys_str_mv AT minguezmorenoinmaculada nursementoringascopingreview
AT gonzalezdelacuestadelia nursementoringascopingreview
AT barradonarvionmariajesus nursementoringascopingreview
AT arnaldosestebanmarta nursementoringascopingreview
AT gonzalezcantalejomar nursementoringascopingreview