Cargando…

Long-Term Outcomes in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Repaired With Absorbable Biologic Polymer Scaffold (Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate)

INTRODUCTION: After promising early outcomes in the use of absorbable biologic mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction, significant criticism has been raised over the longevity of these repairs after its 2-year resorption profile. METHODS: This is the long-term (5-year) follow-up analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buell, Joseph F., Flaris, Alexandros N., Raju, Sukreet, Hauch, Adam, Darden, Michael, Parker, Geoff G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37638247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000032
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: After promising early outcomes in the use of absorbable biologic mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction, significant criticism has been raised over the longevity of these repairs after its 2-year resorption profile. METHODS: This is the long-term (5-year) follow-up analysis of our initial experience with the absorbable polymer scaffold poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh compared with a consecutive contiguous group treated with porcine cadaveric mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstructions. Our clinical analysis was performed using Stata 14.2 and Excel 16.16.23. RESULTS: After a 5-year follow-up period, the P4HB group (n = 31) experienced lower rates of reherniation (12.9% vs 38.1%; P = 0.017) compared with the porcine cadaveric mesh group (n = 42). The median interval in months to recurrent herniation was similar between groups (24.3 vs 20.8; P = 0.700). Multivariate logistic regression analysis on long-term outcomes identified smoking (P = 0.004), African American race (P = 0.004), and the use of cadaveric grafts (P = 0.003) as risks for complication while smoking (P = 0.034) and the use of cadaveric grafts (P = 0.014) were identified as risks for recurrence. The long-term cost analysis showed that P4HB had a $10,595 per case costs savings over porcine cadaveric mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified the superior outcomes in clinical performance and a value-based benefit of absorbable biologic P4HB scaffold persisted after the 2-year resorption timeframe. Data analysis also confirmed the use of porcine cadaveric grafts independently contributed to the incidence of complications and recurrences.