Cargando…

Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review

Background: Healthcare stakeholders in the Netherlands came to an agreement in 2022 to deal with present and future challenges in healthcare. Among others, this agreement contains clear statements regarding the concentration of trauma patients, including the minimal required number of annual severe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foppen, Wouter, Claassen, Yvette, Falck, Debby, van der Meer, Nardo J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165317
_version_ 1785096383612583936
author Foppen, Wouter
Claassen, Yvette
Falck, Debby
van der Meer, Nardo J. M.
author_facet Foppen, Wouter
Claassen, Yvette
Falck, Debby
van der Meer, Nardo J. M.
author_sort Foppen, Wouter
collection PubMed
description Background: Healthcare stakeholders in the Netherlands came to an agreement in 2022 to deal with present and future challenges in healthcare. Among others, this agreement contains clear statements regarding the concentration of trauma patients, including the minimal required number of annual severe trauma patients for Major Trauma Centers. This review investigates the effects of trauma patient volumes on several domains of the quality of healthcare. Methods: PubMed was searched; studies published during the last 10 years reporting quantitative data on trauma patient volume and quality of healthcare were included. Results were summarized and categorized into the quality domains of healthcare. Results: Seventeen studies were included with a total of 1,517,848 patients. A positive association between trauma patient volume and survival was observed in 11/13 studies with adjusted analyses. Few studies addressed other quality domains: efficiency (n = 5), safety (n = 2), and time aspects of care (n = 4). None covered people-centeredness, equitability, or integrated care. Conclusions: Most studies showed a better survival of trauma patients when treated in high-volume hospitals compared to lower volume hospitals. However, the ideal threshold could not be determined. The association between trauma volume and other domains of the quality of healthcare remains unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104551632023-08-26 Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review Foppen, Wouter Claassen, Yvette Falck, Debby van der Meer, Nardo J. M. J Clin Med Review Background: Healthcare stakeholders in the Netherlands came to an agreement in 2022 to deal with present and future challenges in healthcare. Among others, this agreement contains clear statements regarding the concentration of trauma patients, including the minimal required number of annual severe trauma patients for Major Trauma Centers. This review investigates the effects of trauma patient volumes on several domains of the quality of healthcare. Methods: PubMed was searched; studies published during the last 10 years reporting quantitative data on trauma patient volume and quality of healthcare were included. Results were summarized and categorized into the quality domains of healthcare. Results: Seventeen studies were included with a total of 1,517,848 patients. A positive association between trauma patient volume and survival was observed in 11/13 studies with adjusted analyses. Few studies addressed other quality domains: efficiency (n = 5), safety (n = 2), and time aspects of care (n = 4). None covered people-centeredness, equitability, or integrated care. Conclusions: Most studies showed a better survival of trauma patients when treated in high-volume hospitals compared to lower volume hospitals. However, the ideal threshold could not be determined. The association between trauma volume and other domains of the quality of healthcare remains unclear. MDPI 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10455163/ /pubmed/37629358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165317 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Foppen, Wouter
Claassen, Yvette
Falck, Debby
van der Meer, Nardo J. M.
Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
title Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
title_full Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
title_short Trauma Patient Volume and the Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
title_sort trauma patient volume and the quality of care: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165317
work_keys_str_mv AT foppenwouter traumapatientvolumeandthequalityofcareascopingreview
AT claassenyvette traumapatientvolumeandthequalityofcareascopingreview
AT falckdebby traumapatientvolumeandthequalityofcareascopingreview
AT vandermeernardojm traumapatientvolumeandthequalityofcareascopingreview