Cargando…
The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purpose: The present systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of zygomatic implant (ZI) placement using dynamic computer-aided surgery (d-CAIS), static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), and a free-hand approach in patients with severe atrophic edentulous maxilla and/or deficient maxilla. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165418 |
_version_ | 1785096400949739520 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Shengchi Sáenz-Ravello, Gustavo Diaz, Leonardo Wu, Yiqun Davó, Rubén Wang, Feng Magic, Marko Al-Nawas, Bilal Kämmerer, Peer W. |
author_facet | Fan, Shengchi Sáenz-Ravello, Gustavo Diaz, Leonardo Wu, Yiqun Davó, Rubén Wang, Feng Magic, Marko Al-Nawas, Bilal Kämmerer, Peer W. |
author_sort | Fan, Shengchi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The present systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of zygomatic implant (ZI) placement using dynamic computer-aided surgery (d-CAIS), static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), and a free-hand approach in patients with severe atrophic edentulous maxilla and/or deficient maxilla. Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches until May 2023 were performed in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Clinical trials and cadaver studies were selected. The primary outcome was planned/placed deviation. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the survival of ZI and surgical complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted and meta-regression was utilized to compare fiducial registration amounts for d-CAIS and the different designs of s-CAIS. Results: A total of 14 studies with 511 ZIs were included (Nobel Biocare: 274, Southern Implant: 42, SIN Implant: 16, non-mentioned: 179). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the d-CAIS group were 1.81 mm (95% CI: 1.34–2.29) at the entry point and 2.95 mm (95% CI: 1.66–4.24) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 3.49 degrees (95% CI: 2.04–4.93). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the s-CAIS group were 1.19 mm (95% CI: 0.83–1.54) at the entry point and 1.80 mm (95% CI: 1.10–2.50) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 2.15 degrees (95% CI: 1.43–2.88). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the free-hand group were 2.04 mm (95% CI: 1.69–2.39) at the entry point and 3.23 mm (95% CI: 2.34–4.12) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 4.92 degrees (95% CI: 3.86–5.98). There was strong evidence of differences in the average entry, apex, and angular deviation between the navigation, surgical guide, and free-hand groups (p < 0.01). A significant inverse correlation was observed between the number of fiducial screws and the planned/placed deviation regarding entry, apex, and angular measurements. Conclusion: Using d-CAIS and modified s-CAIS for ZI surgery has shown clinically acceptable outcomes regarding average entry, apex, and angular deviations. The maximal deviation values were predominantly observed in the conventional s-CAIS. Surgeons should be mindful of potential deviations and complications regardless of the decision making in different guide approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10455221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104552212023-08-26 The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Fan, Shengchi Sáenz-Ravello, Gustavo Diaz, Leonardo Wu, Yiqun Davó, Rubén Wang, Feng Magic, Marko Al-Nawas, Bilal Kämmerer, Peer W. J Clin Med Systematic Review Purpose: The present systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of zygomatic implant (ZI) placement using dynamic computer-aided surgery (d-CAIS), static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), and a free-hand approach in patients with severe atrophic edentulous maxilla and/or deficient maxilla. Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches until May 2023 were performed in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Clinical trials and cadaver studies were selected. The primary outcome was planned/placed deviation. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the survival of ZI and surgical complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted and meta-regression was utilized to compare fiducial registration amounts for d-CAIS and the different designs of s-CAIS. Results: A total of 14 studies with 511 ZIs were included (Nobel Biocare: 274, Southern Implant: 42, SIN Implant: 16, non-mentioned: 179). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the d-CAIS group were 1.81 mm (95% CI: 1.34–2.29) at the entry point and 2.95 mm (95% CI: 1.66–4.24) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 3.49 degrees (95% CI: 2.04–4.93). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the s-CAIS group were 1.19 mm (95% CI: 0.83–1.54) at the entry point and 1.80 mm (95% CI: 1.10–2.50) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 2.15 degrees (95% CI: 1.43–2.88). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the free-hand group were 2.04 mm (95% CI: 1.69–2.39) at the entry point and 3.23 mm (95% CI: 2.34–4.12) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 4.92 degrees (95% CI: 3.86–5.98). There was strong evidence of differences in the average entry, apex, and angular deviation between the navigation, surgical guide, and free-hand groups (p < 0.01). A significant inverse correlation was observed between the number of fiducial screws and the planned/placed deviation regarding entry, apex, and angular measurements. Conclusion: Using d-CAIS and modified s-CAIS for ZI surgery has shown clinically acceptable outcomes regarding average entry, apex, and angular deviations. The maximal deviation values were predominantly observed in the conventional s-CAIS. Surgeons should be mindful of potential deviations and complications regardless of the decision making in different guide approaches. MDPI 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10455221/ /pubmed/37629460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165418 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Fan, Shengchi Sáenz-Ravello, Gustavo Diaz, Leonardo Wu, Yiqun Davó, Rubén Wang, Feng Magic, Marko Al-Nawas, Bilal Kämmerer, Peer W. The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of zygomatic implant placement assisted by dynamic computer-aided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanshengchi theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saenzravellogustavo theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT diazleonardo theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuyiqun theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT davoruben theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangfeng theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT magicmarko theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alnawasbilal theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kammererpeerw theaccuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanshengchi accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saenzravellogustavo accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT diazleonardo accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuyiqun accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT davoruben accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangfeng accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT magicmarko accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alnawasbilal accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kammererpeerw accuracyofzygomaticimplantplacementassistedbydynamiccomputeraidedsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |