Cargando…
A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14080394 |
_version_ | 1785096407397433344 |
---|---|
author | Hussain, Badra Khan, Sadia Agger, Anne Eriksson Ellingsen, Jan Eirik Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter Bueno, Jaime Haugen, Håvard J. |
author_facet | Hussain, Badra Khan, Sadia Agger, Anne Eriksson Ellingsen, Jan Eirik Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter Bueno, Jaime Haugen, Håvard J. |
author_sort | Hussain, Badra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of combining Pluronic gel with hydrogen peroxide (NuBone(®)Clean) by evaluating pellicle disruption and re-formation on implant surfaces. In addition, ensuring safety with in vitro and human testing protocols. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was utilised for surface analysis. All the tested gels had some effect on the surface cleanness except for PrefGel(®). Among the tested chemical decontamination candidates, NuBone(®)Clean demonstrated effectiveness in providing a cleaner titanium surface. Furthermore, none of the tested chemical agents exhibited cytotoxic effects, and the safety assessment showed no adverse events. The results of this study highlight the significance of conducting comprehensive evaluations, encompassing safety and efficacy, before introducing new chemical agents for dental treatments. The findings suggest that NuBone(®)Clean shows potential as a chemical decontamination solution for implant surfaces. However, further investigation through randomised clinical trials is necessary. By adhering to rigorous testing protocols, the development of safe and efficient chemical decontamination strategies can be advanced, benefiting patients and promoting progress in implant dentistry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10455251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104552512023-08-26 A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces Hussain, Badra Khan, Sadia Agger, Anne Eriksson Ellingsen, Jan Eirik Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter Bueno, Jaime Haugen, Håvard J. J Funct Biomater Article Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of combining Pluronic gel with hydrogen peroxide (NuBone(®)Clean) by evaluating pellicle disruption and re-formation on implant surfaces. In addition, ensuring safety with in vitro and human testing protocols. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was utilised for surface analysis. All the tested gels had some effect on the surface cleanness except for PrefGel(®). Among the tested chemical decontamination candidates, NuBone(®)Clean demonstrated effectiveness in providing a cleaner titanium surface. Furthermore, none of the tested chemical agents exhibited cytotoxic effects, and the safety assessment showed no adverse events. The results of this study highlight the significance of conducting comprehensive evaluations, encompassing safety and efficacy, before introducing new chemical agents for dental treatments. The findings suggest that NuBone(®)Clean shows potential as a chemical decontamination solution for implant surfaces. However, further investigation through randomised clinical trials is necessary. By adhering to rigorous testing protocols, the development of safe and efficient chemical decontamination strategies can be advanced, benefiting patients and promoting progress in implant dentistry. MDPI 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10455251/ /pubmed/37623639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14080394 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hussain, Badra Khan, Sadia Agger, Anne Eriksson Ellingsen, Jan Eirik Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter Bueno, Jaime Haugen, Håvard J. A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces |
title | A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_full | A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_short | A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_sort | comparative investigation of chemical decontamination methods for in-situ cleaning of dental implant surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14080394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hussainbadra acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT khansadia acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT aggeranneeriksson acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT ellingsenjaneirik acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT lyngstadaasstalepetter acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT buenojaime acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT haugenhavardj acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT hussainbadra comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT khansadia comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT aggeranneeriksson comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT ellingsenjaneirik comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT lyngstadaasstalepetter comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT buenojaime comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces AT haugenhavardj comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces |