Cargando…

A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces

Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussain, Badra, Khan, Sadia, Agger, Anne Eriksson, Ellingsen, Jan Eirik, Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter, Bueno, Jaime, Haugen, Håvard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14080394
_version_ 1785096407397433344
author Hussain, Badra
Khan, Sadia
Agger, Anne Eriksson
Ellingsen, Jan Eirik
Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter
Bueno, Jaime
Haugen, Håvard J.
author_facet Hussain, Badra
Khan, Sadia
Agger, Anne Eriksson
Ellingsen, Jan Eirik
Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter
Bueno, Jaime
Haugen, Håvard J.
author_sort Hussain, Badra
collection PubMed
description Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of combining Pluronic gel with hydrogen peroxide (NuBone(®)Clean) by evaluating pellicle disruption and re-formation on implant surfaces. In addition, ensuring safety with in vitro and human testing protocols. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was utilised for surface analysis. All the tested gels had some effect on the surface cleanness except for PrefGel(®). Among the tested chemical decontamination candidates, NuBone(®)Clean demonstrated effectiveness in providing a cleaner titanium surface. Furthermore, none of the tested chemical agents exhibited cytotoxic effects, and the safety assessment showed no adverse events. The results of this study highlight the significance of conducting comprehensive evaluations, encompassing safety and efficacy, before introducing new chemical agents for dental treatments. The findings suggest that NuBone(®)Clean shows potential as a chemical decontamination solution for implant surfaces. However, further investigation through randomised clinical trials is necessary. By adhering to rigorous testing protocols, the development of safe and efficient chemical decontamination strategies can be advanced, benefiting patients and promoting progress in implant dentistry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104552512023-08-26 A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces Hussain, Badra Khan, Sadia Agger, Anne Eriksson Ellingsen, Jan Eirik Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter Bueno, Jaime Haugen, Håvard J. J Funct Biomater Article Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of combining Pluronic gel with hydrogen peroxide (NuBone(®)Clean) by evaluating pellicle disruption and re-formation on implant surfaces. In addition, ensuring safety with in vitro and human testing protocols. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was utilised for surface analysis. All the tested gels had some effect on the surface cleanness except for PrefGel(®). Among the tested chemical decontamination candidates, NuBone(®)Clean demonstrated effectiveness in providing a cleaner titanium surface. Furthermore, none of the tested chemical agents exhibited cytotoxic effects, and the safety assessment showed no adverse events. The results of this study highlight the significance of conducting comprehensive evaluations, encompassing safety and efficacy, before introducing new chemical agents for dental treatments. The findings suggest that NuBone(®)Clean shows potential as a chemical decontamination solution for implant surfaces. However, further investigation through randomised clinical trials is necessary. By adhering to rigorous testing protocols, the development of safe and efficient chemical decontamination strategies can be advanced, benefiting patients and promoting progress in implant dentistry. MDPI 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10455251/ /pubmed/37623639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14080394 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hussain, Badra
Khan, Sadia
Agger, Anne Eriksson
Ellingsen, Jan Eirik
Lyngstadaas, Ståle Petter
Bueno, Jaime
Haugen, Håvard J.
A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
title A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
title_full A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
title_fullStr A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
title_short A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
title_sort comparative investigation of chemical decontamination methods for in-situ cleaning of dental implant surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14080394
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainbadra acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT khansadia acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT aggeranneeriksson acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT ellingsenjaneirik acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT lyngstadaasstalepetter acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT buenojaime acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT haugenhavardj acomparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT hussainbadra comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT khansadia comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT aggeranneeriksson comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT ellingsenjaneirik comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT lyngstadaasstalepetter comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT buenojaime comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces
AT haugenhavardj comparativeinvestigationofchemicaldecontaminationmethodsforinsitucleaningofdentalimplantsurfaces