Cargando…

Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study

Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of automated chest compression devices depending on the time of admission based on the frequency of iatrogenic chest injuries, the duration of in-hospital resuscitation efforts, and clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takayama, Wataru, Endo, Akira, Morishita, Koji, Otomo, Yasuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623453
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081202
_version_ 1785096410831519744
author Takayama, Wataru
Endo, Akira
Morishita, Koji
Otomo, Yasuhiro
author_facet Takayama, Wataru
Endo, Akira
Morishita, Koji
Otomo, Yasuhiro
author_sort Takayama, Wataru
collection PubMed
description Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of automated chest compression devices depending on the time of admission based on the frequency of iatrogenic chest injuries, the duration of in-hospital resuscitation efforts, and clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective historical control study of OHCA patients in Japan between 2015–2022. The patients were divided according to time of admission, where day-time was considered 07:00–22:59 and night-time 23:00–06:59. These patients were then divided into two categories based on the in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IHCPR) device: manual chest compression (mCC) group and automatic chest compression devices (ACCD) group. We used univariate and multivariate ordered logistic regression models adjusted for pre-hospital confounders to evaluate the impact of ACCD use during IHCPR on outcomes (IHCPR duration, CPR-related chest injuries, and clinical outcomes) in the day-time and night-time groups. Results: Among 1101 patients with OHCA (day-time, 809; night-time, 292), including 215 patients who underwent ACCD during IHCPR in day-time (26.6%) and 104 patients in night-time group (35.6%), the multivariate model showed a significant association of ACCD use with the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation and higher rates of return in spontaneous circulation, lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, longer in-hospital resuscitation durations, greater survival to Emergency Department and hospital discharge, and greater survival with good neurological outcome to hospital discharge, though only in the night-time group. Conclusions: Patients who underwent ACCD during in-hospital resuscitation at night had a significantly longer duration of in-hospital resuscitation, a lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, and better outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104552662023-08-26 Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study Takayama, Wataru Endo, Akira Morishita, Koji Otomo, Yasuhiro J Pers Med Article Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of automated chest compression devices depending on the time of admission based on the frequency of iatrogenic chest injuries, the duration of in-hospital resuscitation efforts, and clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective historical control study of OHCA patients in Japan between 2015–2022. The patients were divided according to time of admission, where day-time was considered 07:00–22:59 and night-time 23:00–06:59. These patients were then divided into two categories based on the in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IHCPR) device: manual chest compression (mCC) group and automatic chest compression devices (ACCD) group. We used univariate and multivariate ordered logistic regression models adjusted for pre-hospital confounders to evaluate the impact of ACCD use during IHCPR on outcomes (IHCPR duration, CPR-related chest injuries, and clinical outcomes) in the day-time and night-time groups. Results: Among 1101 patients with OHCA (day-time, 809; night-time, 292), including 215 patients who underwent ACCD during IHCPR in day-time (26.6%) and 104 patients in night-time group (35.6%), the multivariate model showed a significant association of ACCD use with the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation and higher rates of return in spontaneous circulation, lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, longer in-hospital resuscitation durations, greater survival to Emergency Department and hospital discharge, and greater survival with good neurological outcome to hospital discharge, though only in the night-time group. Conclusions: Patients who underwent ACCD during in-hospital resuscitation at night had a significantly longer duration of in-hospital resuscitation, a lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, and better outcomes. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10455266/ /pubmed/37623453 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081202 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Takayama, Wataru
Endo, Akira
Morishita, Koji
Otomo, Yasuhiro
Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
title Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
title_full Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
title_fullStr Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
title_short Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
title_sort manual chest compression versus automated chest compression device during day-time and night-time resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective historical control study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623453
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081202
work_keys_str_mv AT takayamawataru manualchestcompressionversusautomatedchestcompressiondeviceduringdaytimeandnighttimeresuscitationfollowingoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcontrolstudy
AT endoakira manualchestcompressionversusautomatedchestcompressiondeviceduringdaytimeandnighttimeresuscitationfollowingoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcontrolstudy
AT morishitakoji manualchestcompressionversusautomatedchestcompressiondeviceduringdaytimeandnighttimeresuscitationfollowingoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcontrolstudy
AT otomoyasuhiro manualchestcompressionversusautomatedchestcompressiondeviceduringdaytimeandnighttimeresuscitationfollowingoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcontrolstudy