Cargando…
Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
OBJECTIVE: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for scirrhous gastric cancer (GC) as a unique subtype also known as type 4 gastric cancer or linitis plastica. BACKGROUND: Although data on the effi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000063 |
_version_ | 1785096411070595072 |
---|---|
author | Fujita, Yusuke Nishigori, Tatsuto Kadokawa, Yoshio Itami, Atsushi Kondo, Masato Hosogi, Hisahiro Kanaya, Seiichiro Kawada, Hironori Hata, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Michihiro Kinjo, Yousuke Tanaka, Eiji Manaka, Dai Satoh, Seiji Okabe, Hiroshi Tsunoda, Shigeru Sakaguchi, Masazumi Hisamori, Shigeo Hida, Koya Tanaka, Shiro Obama, Kazutaka |
author_facet | Fujita, Yusuke Nishigori, Tatsuto Kadokawa, Yoshio Itami, Atsushi Kondo, Masato Hosogi, Hisahiro Kanaya, Seiichiro Kawada, Hironori Hata, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Michihiro Kinjo, Yousuke Tanaka, Eiji Manaka, Dai Satoh, Seiji Okabe, Hiroshi Tsunoda, Shigeru Sakaguchi, Masazumi Hisamori, Shigeo Hida, Koya Tanaka, Shiro Obama, Kazutaka |
author_sort | Fujita, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for scirrhous gastric cancer (GC) as a unique subtype also known as type 4 gastric cancer or linitis plastica. BACKGROUND: Although data on the efficacy and safety of LG as an alternative to OG are emerging, the applicability of LG to scirrhous GC remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with clinical type 4 GC undergoing gastrectomy at 13 hospitals from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. As the primary endpoint, we compared overall survival (OS) between the LG and OG groups. To adjust for confounding factors, we used multivariate Cox regression analysis for the main analyses and propensity-score matching for sensitivity analysis. Short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients (LG, 62; OG, 226) were included in the main analysis. Postoperative complications occurred in 25.8% and 30.1%, respectively (P = 0.44). No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was observed (P = 0.72). The 5-year OS rates were 32.4% and 31.6% in the LG and OG groups, respectively (P = 0.60). The hazard ratio (LG/OG) for OS was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.43) in the multivariate regression analysis. In the sensitivity analyses after propensity-score matching, the hazard ratio for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.58–1.45). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS, LG for scirrhous GC was not associated with worse survival than that for OG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10455267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104552672023-08-26 Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study Fujita, Yusuke Nishigori, Tatsuto Kadokawa, Yoshio Itami, Atsushi Kondo, Masato Hosogi, Hisahiro Kanaya, Seiichiro Kawada, Hironori Hata, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Michihiro Kinjo, Yousuke Tanaka, Eiji Manaka, Dai Satoh, Seiji Okabe, Hiroshi Tsunoda, Shigeru Sakaguchi, Masazumi Hisamori, Shigeo Hida, Koya Tanaka, Shiro Obama, Kazutaka Ann Surg Open Original Study OBJECTIVE: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for scirrhous gastric cancer (GC) as a unique subtype also known as type 4 gastric cancer or linitis plastica. BACKGROUND: Although data on the efficacy and safety of LG as an alternative to OG are emerging, the applicability of LG to scirrhous GC remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with clinical type 4 GC undergoing gastrectomy at 13 hospitals from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. As the primary endpoint, we compared overall survival (OS) between the LG and OG groups. To adjust for confounding factors, we used multivariate Cox regression analysis for the main analyses and propensity-score matching for sensitivity analysis. Short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients (LG, 62; OG, 226) were included in the main analysis. Postoperative complications occurred in 25.8% and 30.1%, respectively (P = 0.44). No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was observed (P = 0.72). The 5-year OS rates were 32.4% and 31.6% in the LG and OG groups, respectively (P = 0.60). The hazard ratio (LG/OG) for OS was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.43) in the multivariate regression analysis. In the sensitivity analyses after propensity-score matching, the hazard ratio for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.58–1.45). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS, LG for scirrhous GC was not associated with worse survival than that for OG. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10455267/ /pubmed/37636555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000063 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Study Fujita, Yusuke Nishigori, Tatsuto Kadokawa, Yoshio Itami, Atsushi Kondo, Masato Hosogi, Hisahiro Kanaya, Seiichiro Kawada, Hironori Hata, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Michihiro Kinjo, Yousuke Tanaka, Eiji Manaka, Dai Satoh, Seiji Okabe, Hiroshi Tsunoda, Shigeru Sakaguchi, Masazumi Hisamori, Shigeo Hida, Koya Tanaka, Shiro Obama, Kazutaka Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | comparative outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy for scirrhous gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujitayusuke comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT nishigoritatsuto comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT kadokawayoshio comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT itamiatsushi comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT kondomasato comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT hosogihisahiro comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT kanayaseiichiro comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT kawadahironori comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT hatahiroaki comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT yamamotomichihiro comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT kinjoyousuke comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT tanakaeiji comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT manakadai comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT satohseiji comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT okabehiroshi comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT tsunodashigeru comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT sakaguchimasazumi comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT hisamorishigeo comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT hidakoya comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT tanakashiro comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT obamakazutaka comparativeoutcomesoflaparoscopicgastrectomyandopengastrectomyforscirrhousgastriccanceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy |