Cargando…

Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heuthorst, Lianne, Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M., Reijntjes, Maud A., Hompes, Roel, Buskens, Christianne J., Bemelman, Willem A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074
_version_ 1785096420298063872
author Heuthorst, Lianne
Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M.
Reijntjes, Maud A.
Hompes, Roel
Buskens, Christianne J.
Bemelman, Willem A.
author_facet Heuthorst, Lianne
Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M.
Reijntjes, Maud A.
Hompes, Roel
Buskens, Christianne J.
Bemelman, Willem A.
author_sort Heuthorst, Lianne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. RESULTS: Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56–10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24–14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1–17%), pelvic sepsis (2–18%), fistula (1–30%), stricture (1–34%), pouchitis (11–61%), and Crohn’s disease of the pouch (0–18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak. MINI ABSTRACT: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104553052023-08-26 Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Heuthorst, Lianne Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M. Reijntjes, Maud A. Hompes, Roel Buskens, Christianne J. Bemelman, Willem A. Ann Surg Open Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. RESULTS: Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56–10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24–14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1–17%), pelvic sepsis (2–18%), fistula (1–30%), stricture (1–34%), pouchitis (11–61%), and Crohn’s disease of the pouch (0–18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak. MINI ABSTRACT: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10455305/ /pubmed/37636549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Heuthorst, Lianne
Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M.
Reijntjes, Maud A.
Hompes, Roel
Buskens, Christianne J.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and pouch failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074
work_keys_str_mv AT heuthorstlianne ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wasmannkarinatgm ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reijntjesmauda ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hompesroel ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT buskenschristiannej ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bemelmanwillema ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis