Cargando…
Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074 |
_version_ | 1785096420298063872 |
---|---|
author | Heuthorst, Lianne Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M. Reijntjes, Maud A. Hompes, Roel Buskens, Christianne J. Bemelman, Willem A. |
author_facet | Heuthorst, Lianne Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M. Reijntjes, Maud A. Hompes, Roel Buskens, Christianne J. Bemelman, Willem A. |
author_sort | Heuthorst, Lianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. RESULTS: Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56–10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24–14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1–17%), pelvic sepsis (2–18%), fistula (1–30%), stricture (1–34%), pouchitis (11–61%), and Crohn’s disease of the pouch (0–18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak. MINI ABSTRACT: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10455305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104553052023-08-26 Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Heuthorst, Lianne Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M. Reijntjes, Maud A. Hompes, Roel Buskens, Christianne J. Bemelman, Willem A. Ann Surg Open Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. RESULTS: Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56–10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24–14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1–17%), pelvic sepsis (2–18%), fistula (1–30%), stricture (1–34%), pouchitis (11–61%), and Crohn’s disease of the pouch (0–18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak. MINI ABSTRACT: This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10455305/ /pubmed/37636549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Heuthorst, Lianne Wasmann, Karin A. T. G. M. Reijntjes, Maud A. Hompes, Roel Buskens, Christianne J. Bemelman, Willem A. Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and pouch failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heuthorstlianne ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wasmannkarinatgm ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT reijntjesmauda ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hompesroel ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT buskenschristiannej ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bemelmanwillema ilealpouchanalanastomosiscomplicationsandpouchfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |