Cargando…
Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives
The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and breast MRI for primary breast cancer (BC) response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate future perspectives in this setting. We performed a critical review using three...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165355 |
_version_ | 1785096429758316544 |
---|---|
author | Caracciolo, Matteo Castello, Angelo Urso, Luca Borgia, Francesca Marzola, Maria Cristina Uccelli, Licia Cittanti, Corrado Bartolomei, Mirco Castellani, Massimo Lopci, Egesta |
author_facet | Caracciolo, Matteo Castello, Angelo Urso, Luca Borgia, Francesca Marzola, Maria Cristina Uccelli, Licia Cittanti, Corrado Bartolomei, Mirco Castellani, Massimo Lopci, Egesta |
author_sort | Caracciolo, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and breast MRI for primary breast cancer (BC) response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate future perspectives in this setting. We performed a critical review using three bibliographic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for articles published up to the 6 June 2023, starting from 2012. The Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of 76 studies were identified and screened, while 14 articles were included in our systematic review after a full-text assessment. The total number of patients included was 842. Eight out of fourteen studies (57.1%) were prospective, while all except one study were conducted in a single center. In the majority of the included studies (71.4%), 3.0 Tesla (T) MRI scans were adopted. Three out of fourteen studies (21.4%) used both 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI and only two used 1.5 T. [(18)F]FDG was the radiotracer used in every study included. All patients accepted surgical treatment after NAC and each study used pathological complete response (pCR) as the reference standard. Some of the studies have demonstrated the superiority of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, while others proved that MRI was superior to PET/CT. Recent studies indicate that PET/CT has a better specificity, while MRI has a superior sensitivity for assessing pCR in BC patients after NAC. The complementary value of the combined use of these modalities represents probably the most important tool to improve diagnostic performance in this setting. Overall, larger prospective studies, possibly randomized, are needed, hopefully evaluating PET/MR and allowing for new tools, such as radiomic parameters, to find a proper place in the setting of BC patients undergoing NAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10455346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104553462023-08-26 Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives Caracciolo, Matteo Castello, Angelo Urso, Luca Borgia, Francesca Marzola, Maria Cristina Uccelli, Licia Cittanti, Corrado Bartolomei, Mirco Castellani, Massimo Lopci, Egesta J Clin Med Review The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and breast MRI for primary breast cancer (BC) response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate future perspectives in this setting. We performed a critical review using three bibliographic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for articles published up to the 6 June 2023, starting from 2012. The Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of 76 studies were identified and screened, while 14 articles were included in our systematic review after a full-text assessment. The total number of patients included was 842. Eight out of fourteen studies (57.1%) were prospective, while all except one study were conducted in a single center. In the majority of the included studies (71.4%), 3.0 Tesla (T) MRI scans were adopted. Three out of fourteen studies (21.4%) used both 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI and only two used 1.5 T. [(18)F]FDG was the radiotracer used in every study included. All patients accepted surgical treatment after NAC and each study used pathological complete response (pCR) as the reference standard. Some of the studies have demonstrated the superiority of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, while others proved that MRI was superior to PET/CT. Recent studies indicate that PET/CT has a better specificity, while MRI has a superior sensitivity for assessing pCR in BC patients after NAC. The complementary value of the combined use of these modalities represents probably the most important tool to improve diagnostic performance in this setting. Overall, larger prospective studies, possibly randomized, are needed, hopefully evaluating PET/MR and allowing for new tools, such as radiomic parameters, to find a proper place in the setting of BC patients undergoing NAC. MDPI 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10455346/ /pubmed/37629397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165355 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Caracciolo, Matteo Castello, Angelo Urso, Luca Borgia, Francesca Marzola, Maria Cristina Uccelli, Licia Cittanti, Corrado Bartolomei, Mirco Castellani, Massimo Lopci, Egesta Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives |
title | Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives |
title_full | Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives |
title_short | Comparison of MRI vs. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives |
title_sort | comparison of mri vs. [(18)f]fdg pet/ct for treatment response evaluation of primary breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: literature review and future perspectives |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caracciolomatteo comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT castelloangelo comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT ursoluca comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT borgiafrancesca comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT marzolamariacristina comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT uccellilicia comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT cittanticorrado comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT bartolomeimirco comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT castellanimassimo comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives AT lopciegesta comparisonofmrivs18ffdgpetctfortreatmentresponseevaluationofprimarybreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyliteraturereviewandfutureperspectives |