Cargando…
Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080326 |
_version_ | 1785096445540433920 |
---|---|
author | Purmessur, Rushmi Wijesena, Tharushi Ali, Jason |
author_facet | Purmessur, Rushmi Wijesena, Tharushi Ali, Jason |
author_sort | Purmessur, Rushmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms—namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10455416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104554162023-08-26 Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future Purmessur, Rushmi Wijesena, Tharushi Ali, Jason J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Review Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms—namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10455416/ /pubmed/37623339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080326 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Purmessur, Rushmi Wijesena, Tharushi Ali, Jason Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future |
title | Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full | Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future |
title_fullStr | Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future |
title_short | Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future |
title_sort | minimal-access coronary revascularization: past, present, and future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purmessurrushmi minimalaccesscoronaryrevascularizationpastpresentandfuture AT wijesenatharushi minimalaccesscoronaryrevascularizationpastpresentandfuture AT alijason minimalaccesscoronaryrevascularizationpastpresentandfuture |