Cargando…

Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future

Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purmessur, Rushmi, Wijesena, Tharushi, Ali, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080326
_version_ 1785096445540433920
author Purmessur, Rushmi
Wijesena, Tharushi
Ali, Jason
author_facet Purmessur, Rushmi
Wijesena, Tharushi
Ali, Jason
author_sort Purmessur, Rushmi
collection PubMed
description Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms—namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104554162023-08-26 Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future Purmessur, Rushmi Wijesena, Tharushi Ali, Jason J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Review Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms—namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10455416/ /pubmed/37623339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080326 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Purmessur, Rushmi
Wijesena, Tharushi
Ali, Jason
Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
title Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
title_full Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
title_fullStr Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
title_full_unstemmed Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
title_short Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
title_sort minimal-access coronary revascularization: past, present, and future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080326
work_keys_str_mv AT purmessurrushmi minimalaccesscoronaryrevascularizationpastpresentandfuture
AT wijesenatharushi minimalaccesscoronaryrevascularizationpastpresentandfuture
AT alijason minimalaccesscoronaryrevascularizationpastpresentandfuture