Cargando…

Conversion to Resectability Using Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether this conversion rate to resectability could be increased when patients are treated with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (TACE-HAIC) using oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin. BACKGROUND: Conventional TACE (c-TACE) is a co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Binkui, Qiu, Jiliang, Zheng, Yun, Shi, Yunxing, Zou, Ruhai, He, Wei, Yuan, Yichuang, Zhang, Yuanping, Wang, Chenwei, Qiu, Zhiyu, Li, Kai, Zhong, Chengrui, Yuan, Yunfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000057
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether this conversion rate to resectability could be increased when patients are treated with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (TACE-HAIC) using oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin. BACKGROUND: Conventional TACE (c-TACE) is a common regimen for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which converts to curative-intent resection in about 10% of those patients. It is urgent need to investigated better regimen for those patients. METHODS: The data of 83 initially unresectable HCC patients were examined, including 41 patients in the TACE-HAIC group and 42 patients in the c-TACE group. Their response rate, conversion rate to resection, survival outcome, and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: The conversion rate was significantly better in the TACE-HAIC group than in the c-TACE group (48.8% vs 9.5%; P < 0.001). The TACE-HAIC had marginal superiority in overall response rate as compared to c-TACE (14.6% vs 2.4%; P = 0.107 [RECIST]; 65.9% vs 16.7%; P < 0.001 [mRECIST], respectively). The median progression-free survival was not available and 9.2 months for the TACE-HAIC and cTACE groups, respectively (hazard rate [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.70; P = 0.003). The median overall survival was not available and 13.5 months for the TACE-HAIC and c-TACE groups, respectively (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.34–1.17; P = 0.132). The 2 groups had similar rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TACE-HAIC demonstrated a higher conversion rate and progression-free survival benefit than c-TACE and could be considered as a more effective regimen for patients with initially unresectable HCC. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm it.