Cargando…

Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study

Otoplan is a surgical planning software designed to assist with cochlear implant surgery. One of its outputs is a recommendation of electrode array type based on imaging parameters. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the differences in auditory outcomes between patients who were implanted wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Távora-Vieira, Dayse, Voola, Marcus, Kuthubutheen, Jafri, Friedland, Peter, Gibson, Daren, Acharya, Aanand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081276
_version_ 1785096507150565376
author Távora-Vieira, Dayse
Voola, Marcus
Kuthubutheen, Jafri
Friedland, Peter
Gibson, Daren
Acharya, Aanand
author_facet Távora-Vieira, Dayse
Voola, Marcus
Kuthubutheen, Jafri
Friedland, Peter
Gibson, Daren
Acharya, Aanand
author_sort Távora-Vieira, Dayse
collection PubMed
description Otoplan is a surgical planning software designed to assist with cochlear implant surgery. One of its outputs is a recommendation of electrode array type based on imaging parameters. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the differences in auditory outcomes between patients who were implanted with arrays corresponding to those recommended by the Otoplan software versus those in which the array selection differed from the Otoplan recommendation. Pre-operative CT images from 114 patients were imported into the software, and array recommendations were generated. These were compared to the arrays which had actually been implanted during surgery, both in terms of array type and length. As recommended, 47% of patients received the same array, 34% received a shorter array, and 18% received a longer array. For reasons relating to structure and hearing preservation, 83% received the more flexible arrays. Those who received stiffer arrays had cochlear malformations or ossification. A negative, although non-statistically significant correlation was observed between the CNC scores at 12 months and the absolute value of the difference between recommended array and implanted array. In conclusion, clinicians may be slightly biased toward shorter electrode arrays due to their perceived greater ability to achieve full insertion. Using 3D imaging during the pre-operative planning may improve clinicians’ confidence to implant longer electrode arrays, where appropriate, to achieve optimum hearing outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104556632023-08-26 Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study Távora-Vieira, Dayse Voola, Marcus Kuthubutheen, Jafri Friedland, Peter Gibson, Daren Acharya, Aanand J Pers Med Article Otoplan is a surgical planning software designed to assist with cochlear implant surgery. One of its outputs is a recommendation of electrode array type based on imaging parameters. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the differences in auditory outcomes between patients who were implanted with arrays corresponding to those recommended by the Otoplan software versus those in which the array selection differed from the Otoplan recommendation. Pre-operative CT images from 114 patients were imported into the software, and array recommendations were generated. These were compared to the arrays which had actually been implanted during surgery, both in terms of array type and length. As recommended, 47% of patients received the same array, 34% received a shorter array, and 18% received a longer array. For reasons relating to structure and hearing preservation, 83% received the more flexible arrays. Those who received stiffer arrays had cochlear malformations or ossification. A negative, although non-statistically significant correlation was observed between the CNC scores at 12 months and the absolute value of the difference between recommended array and implanted array. In conclusion, clinicians may be slightly biased toward shorter electrode arrays due to their perceived greater ability to achieve full insertion. Using 3D imaging during the pre-operative planning may improve clinicians’ confidence to implant longer electrode arrays, where appropriate, to achieve optimum hearing outcomes. MDPI 2023-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10455663/ /pubmed/37623526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081276 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Távora-Vieira, Dayse
Voola, Marcus
Kuthubutheen, Jafri
Friedland, Peter
Gibson, Daren
Acharya, Aanand
Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study
title Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study
title_full Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study
title_short Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study
title_sort evaluation of the performance of otoplan-based cochlear implant electrode array selection: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081276
work_keys_str_mv AT tavoravieiradayse evaluationoftheperformanceofotoplanbasedcochlearimplantelectrodearrayselectionaretrospectivestudy
AT voolamarcus evaluationoftheperformanceofotoplanbasedcochlearimplantelectrodearrayselectionaretrospectivestudy
AT kuthubutheenjafri evaluationoftheperformanceofotoplanbasedcochlearimplantelectrodearrayselectionaretrospectivestudy
AT friedlandpeter evaluationoftheperformanceofotoplanbasedcochlearimplantelectrodearrayselectionaretrospectivestudy
AT gibsondaren evaluationoftheperformanceofotoplanbasedcochlearimplantelectrodearrayselectionaretrospectivestudy
AT acharyaaanand evaluationoftheperformanceofotoplanbasedcochlearimplantelectrodearrayselectionaretrospectivestudy