Cargando…

Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach—D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence by conducting a comprehensive literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinescu, Venera-Cristina, Gheorman, Veronica, Georgescu, Eugen Florin, Paitici, Ștefan, Bică, Marius, Pătrașcu, Ștefan, Bunescu, Marius Gabriel, Popa, Romeo, Berceanu, Mihaela Corina, Pătrașcu, Ana Maria, Gheorman, Lavinia Maria, Dinescu, Sorin Nicolae, Udriștoiu, Ion, Gheorman, Victor, Forțofoiu, Mircea Cătălin, Cojan, Tiberiu-Ștefăniță Țenea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081769
Descripción
Sumario:Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach—D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence by conducting a comprehensive literature review and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. The analysis includes studies, clinical trials, and systematic reviews that assess survival outcomes, morbidity, and quality of life. The selected studies revealed different outcomes associated with D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy, including lymph node harvest, disease control, recurrence rates, and overall survival. Postoperative complications also varied between the two techniques. These findings highlight the complex considerations involved in selecting the most suitable lymphadenectomy approach for individual patients. Therefore, the decision requires an individualized assessment that considers the potential benefits and risks of D1 and D2 techniques. A collaborative approach involving interdisciplinary teams is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans that optimize both oncological outcomes and postoperative quality of life.