Cargando…

Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction

The frequency of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression after cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation varies from 7.2% to 44.7%. TR is associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure (HF) decompensation. The aim of this study was to assess the rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chodór-Rozwadowska, Karolina, Sawicka, Magdalena, Morawski, Stanisław, Kalarus, Zbigniew, Kukulski, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080353
_version_ 1785096553622405120
author Chodór-Rozwadowska, Karolina
Sawicka, Magdalena
Morawski, Stanisław
Kalarus, Zbigniew
Kukulski, Tomasz
author_facet Chodór-Rozwadowska, Karolina
Sawicka, Magdalena
Morawski, Stanisław
Kalarus, Zbigniew
Kukulski, Tomasz
author_sort Chodór-Rozwadowska, Karolina
collection PubMed
description The frequency of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression after cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation varies from 7.2% to 44.7%. TR is associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure (HF) decompensation. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of early TR progression after CIED implantation and the frequency of HF decompensation and mortality. The 101 patients, who received a CIED between March 2020 and October 2021, before the procedure were divided into two groups–one with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40% (n = 60) and one with LVEF < 40% (n = 41). Lead-related tricuspid regurgitation (LRTR) was defined as an increase of TR by at least one grade. The follow-up period was similar between both groups and was on average 13 (12–16) months. In the whole study group, TR progression by one grade was 34.6% and by two or more grades 15.8%. The significant changes in the dynamic of TR degree were as follows before and after implantation: none/trivial TR in group 1 (61.7% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.01) and severe/massive TR in group 2 (0.0% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.03). The groups did not differ from each other in terms of survival from decompensation of HF (18.3% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.70) and survival from death (1.7% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.16). At the one-year follow-up, the baseline LVEF did not affect the survival rate from death or HF decompensation among patients with a progression of TR after CIED implantation. In this study, a progression by one grade was more common in group 1, but the occurrence of severe/massive TR after implantation was more specific for group 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104558582023-08-26 Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction Chodór-Rozwadowska, Karolina Sawicka, Magdalena Morawski, Stanisław Kalarus, Zbigniew Kukulski, Tomasz J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article The frequency of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression after cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation varies from 7.2% to 44.7%. TR is associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure (HF) decompensation. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of early TR progression after CIED implantation and the frequency of HF decompensation and mortality. The 101 patients, who received a CIED between March 2020 and October 2021, before the procedure were divided into two groups–one with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40% (n = 60) and one with LVEF < 40% (n = 41). Lead-related tricuspid regurgitation (LRTR) was defined as an increase of TR by at least one grade. The follow-up period was similar between both groups and was on average 13 (12–16) months. In the whole study group, TR progression by one grade was 34.6% and by two or more grades 15.8%. The significant changes in the dynamic of TR degree were as follows before and after implantation: none/trivial TR in group 1 (61.7% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.01) and severe/massive TR in group 2 (0.0% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.03). The groups did not differ from each other in terms of survival from decompensation of HF (18.3% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.70) and survival from death (1.7% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.16). At the one-year follow-up, the baseline LVEF did not affect the survival rate from death or HF decompensation among patients with a progression of TR after CIED implantation. In this study, a progression by one grade was more common in group 1, but the occurrence of severe/massive TR after implantation was more specific for group 2. MDPI 2023-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10455858/ /pubmed/37623367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080353 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chodór-Rozwadowska, Karolina
Sawicka, Magdalena
Morawski, Stanisław
Kalarus, Zbigniew
Kukulski, Tomasz
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction
title Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction
title_full Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction
title_fullStr Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction
title_short Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) after Implantation of a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)—One-Year Observation of Patients with or without Left Ventricular Dysfunction
title_sort tricuspid regurgitation (tr) after implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (cied)—one-year observation of patients with or without left ventricular dysfunction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080353
work_keys_str_mv AT chodorrozwadowskakarolina tricuspidregurgitationtrafterimplantationofacardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceciedoneyearobservationofpatientswithorwithoutleftventriculardysfunction
AT sawickamagdalena tricuspidregurgitationtrafterimplantationofacardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceciedoneyearobservationofpatientswithorwithoutleftventriculardysfunction
AT morawskistanisław tricuspidregurgitationtrafterimplantationofacardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceciedoneyearobservationofpatientswithorwithoutleftventriculardysfunction
AT kalaruszbigniew tricuspidregurgitationtrafterimplantationofacardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceciedoneyearobservationofpatientswithorwithoutleftventriculardysfunction
AT kukulskitomasz tricuspidregurgitationtrafterimplantationofacardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceciedoneyearobservationofpatientswithorwithoutleftventriculardysfunction