Cargando…

Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines in a large orthodontic population referred to the University of Turin. Methods: Panoramic radiographs, intraoral photographs, and dental casts of 2119 patients referred to the Departme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agastra, Eanda, Saettone, Margherita, Parrini, Simone, Cugliari, Giovanni, Deregibus, Andrea, Castroflorio, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165375
_version_ 1785096564905082880
author Agastra, Eanda
Saettone, Margherita
Parrini, Simone
Cugliari, Giovanni
Deregibus, Andrea
Castroflorio, Tommaso
author_facet Agastra, Eanda
Saettone, Margherita
Parrini, Simone
Cugliari, Giovanni
Deregibus, Andrea
Castroflorio, Tommaso
author_sort Agastra, Eanda
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines in a large orthodontic population referred to the University of Turin. Methods: Panoramic radiographs, intraoral photographs, and dental casts of 2119 patients referred to the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Turin, Italy, between 1995 and 2022 were reviewed. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A included 1479 patients found in the Dental School archive before 2017, more specifically between 1995 and 2017. These patients were examined in order to calculate the prevalence of impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines. From 2017 to 2022, the records of 640 new patients were examined (GROUP B) in order to calculate the incidence of these occurrences. Results: The prevalence of mandibular canine impaction in Group A was found to be 1.7%, with a total of 25 patients having mandibular canine impaction. A prevalence of 0.3% was found for mandibular canine transmigration (Group A). The incidence of mandibular canine impaction was found to be 2%, with a total of 13 patients with mandibular canine impaction (Group B). Mandibular canine transmigration was found in 1 of 640 participants (Group B). Conclusions: Twenty-five of 1479 patients had impacted mandibular canines, resulting in a prevalence value of 1.7%. The incidence was found to be 2%, with 13 of 640 patients having impacted mandibular canines. These results show higher prevalence and incidence rates of mandibular canine impaction when compared with previously published data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10455905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104559052023-08-26 Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation Agastra, Eanda Saettone, Margherita Parrini, Simone Cugliari, Giovanni Deregibus, Andrea Castroflorio, Tommaso J Clin Med Article Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines in a large orthodontic population referred to the University of Turin. Methods: Panoramic radiographs, intraoral photographs, and dental casts of 2119 patients referred to the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Turin, Italy, between 1995 and 2022 were reviewed. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A included 1479 patients found in the Dental School archive before 2017, more specifically between 1995 and 2017. These patients were examined in order to calculate the prevalence of impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines. From 2017 to 2022, the records of 640 new patients were examined (GROUP B) in order to calculate the incidence of these occurrences. Results: The prevalence of mandibular canine impaction in Group A was found to be 1.7%, with a total of 25 patients having mandibular canine impaction. A prevalence of 0.3% was found for mandibular canine transmigration (Group A). The incidence of mandibular canine impaction was found to be 2%, with a total of 13 patients with mandibular canine impaction (Group B). Mandibular canine transmigration was found in 1 of 640 participants (Group B). Conclusions: Twenty-five of 1479 patients had impacted mandibular canines, resulting in a prevalence value of 1.7%. The incidence was found to be 2%, with 13 of 640 patients having impacted mandibular canines. These results show higher prevalence and incidence rates of mandibular canine impaction when compared with previously published data. MDPI 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10455905/ /pubmed/37629417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165375 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Agastra, Eanda
Saettone, Margherita
Parrini, Simone
Cugliari, Giovanni
Deregibus, Andrea
Castroflorio, Tommaso
Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation
title Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation
title_full Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation
title_fullStr Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation
title_short Impacted Permanent Mandibular Canines: Epidemiological Evaluation
title_sort impacted permanent mandibular canines: epidemiological evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165375
work_keys_str_mv AT agastraeanda impactedpermanentmandibularcaninesepidemiologicalevaluation
AT saettonemargherita impactedpermanentmandibularcaninesepidemiologicalevaluation
AT parrinisimone impactedpermanentmandibularcaninesepidemiologicalevaluation
AT cugliarigiovanni impactedpermanentmandibularcaninesepidemiologicalevaluation
AT deregibusandrea impactedpermanentmandibularcaninesepidemiologicalevaluation
AT castrofloriotommaso impactedpermanentmandibularcaninesepidemiologicalevaluation