Cargando…

Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues

Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conti, Clara Benedetta, Cereatti, Fabrizio, Salerno, Raffaele, Grassia, Roberto, Scaravaglio, Miki, Laurenza, Carmen, Dinelli, Marco Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081694
_version_ 1785096595498336256
author Conti, Clara Benedetta
Cereatti, Fabrizio
Salerno, Raffaele
Grassia, Roberto
Scaravaglio, Miki
Laurenza, Carmen
Dinelli, Marco Emilio
author_facet Conti, Clara Benedetta
Cereatti, Fabrizio
Salerno, Raffaele
Grassia, Roberto
Scaravaglio, Miki
Laurenza, Carmen
Dinelli, Marco Emilio
author_sort Conti, Clara Benedetta
collection PubMed
description Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteria. Urgent endoscopy could also be a good setting for the use of single-use duodenoscopes, especially when the risk of the infection cannot be evaluated. Their safety and efficacy in performing ERCP has been proven in many studies. However, randomized clinical trials and comparative large studies with reusable scopes are lacking. Moreover, the present early stage of their introduction on the market does not allow a large economical evaluation for each health system. Thus, accurate economical and safety comparisons with cap-disposable duodenoscopes are needed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use duodenoscopes should be carefully evaluated, considering the ongoing climate change. In conclusion, definitive guidelines are needed to choose wisely the appropriate patients for ERCP with disposable duodenoscopes as the complete switch to single-use duodenoscopes seems to be difficult, to date. Many issues are still open, and they need to be carefully evaluated in further, larger studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104560222023-08-26 Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues Conti, Clara Benedetta Cereatti, Fabrizio Salerno, Raffaele Grassia, Roberto Scaravaglio, Miki Laurenza, Carmen Dinelli, Marco Emilio Life (Basel) Review Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteria. Urgent endoscopy could also be a good setting for the use of single-use duodenoscopes, especially when the risk of the infection cannot be evaluated. Their safety and efficacy in performing ERCP has been proven in many studies. However, randomized clinical trials and comparative large studies with reusable scopes are lacking. Moreover, the present early stage of their introduction on the market does not allow a large economical evaluation for each health system. Thus, accurate economical and safety comparisons with cap-disposable duodenoscopes are needed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use duodenoscopes should be carefully evaluated, considering the ongoing climate change. In conclusion, definitive guidelines are needed to choose wisely the appropriate patients for ERCP with disposable duodenoscopes as the complete switch to single-use duodenoscopes seems to be difficult, to date. Many issues are still open, and they need to be carefully evaluated in further, larger studies. MDPI 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10456022/ /pubmed/37629551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081694 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Conti, Clara Benedetta
Cereatti, Fabrizio
Salerno, Raffaele
Grassia, Roberto
Scaravaglio, Miki
Laurenza, Carmen
Dinelli, Marco Emilio
Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
title Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
title_full Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
title_fullStr Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
title_full_unstemmed Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
title_short Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
title_sort disposable duodenoscopes: evidence and open issues
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081694
work_keys_str_mv AT conticlarabenedetta disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues
AT cereattifabrizio disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues
AT salernoraffaele disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues
AT grassiaroberto disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues
AT scaravagliomiki disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues
AT laurenzacarmen disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues
AT dinellimarcoemilio disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues