Cargando…
Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues
Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081694 |
_version_ | 1785096595498336256 |
---|---|
author | Conti, Clara Benedetta Cereatti, Fabrizio Salerno, Raffaele Grassia, Roberto Scaravaglio, Miki Laurenza, Carmen Dinelli, Marco Emilio |
author_facet | Conti, Clara Benedetta Cereatti, Fabrizio Salerno, Raffaele Grassia, Roberto Scaravaglio, Miki Laurenza, Carmen Dinelli, Marco Emilio |
author_sort | Conti, Clara Benedetta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteria. Urgent endoscopy could also be a good setting for the use of single-use duodenoscopes, especially when the risk of the infection cannot be evaluated. Their safety and efficacy in performing ERCP has been proven in many studies. However, randomized clinical trials and comparative large studies with reusable scopes are lacking. Moreover, the present early stage of their introduction on the market does not allow a large economical evaluation for each health system. Thus, accurate economical and safety comparisons with cap-disposable duodenoscopes are needed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use duodenoscopes should be carefully evaluated, considering the ongoing climate change. In conclusion, definitive guidelines are needed to choose wisely the appropriate patients for ERCP with disposable duodenoscopes as the complete switch to single-use duodenoscopes seems to be difficult, to date. Many issues are still open, and they need to be carefully evaluated in further, larger studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10456022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104560222023-08-26 Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues Conti, Clara Benedetta Cereatti, Fabrizio Salerno, Raffaele Grassia, Roberto Scaravaglio, Miki Laurenza, Carmen Dinelli, Marco Emilio Life (Basel) Review Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteria. Urgent endoscopy could also be a good setting for the use of single-use duodenoscopes, especially when the risk of the infection cannot be evaluated. Their safety and efficacy in performing ERCP has been proven in many studies. However, randomized clinical trials and comparative large studies with reusable scopes are lacking. Moreover, the present early stage of their introduction on the market does not allow a large economical evaluation for each health system. Thus, accurate economical and safety comparisons with cap-disposable duodenoscopes are needed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use duodenoscopes should be carefully evaluated, considering the ongoing climate change. In conclusion, definitive guidelines are needed to choose wisely the appropriate patients for ERCP with disposable duodenoscopes as the complete switch to single-use duodenoscopes seems to be difficult, to date. Many issues are still open, and they need to be carefully evaluated in further, larger studies. MDPI 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10456022/ /pubmed/37629551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081694 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Conti, Clara Benedetta Cereatti, Fabrizio Salerno, Raffaele Grassia, Roberto Scaravaglio, Miki Laurenza, Carmen Dinelli, Marco Emilio Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues |
title | Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues |
title_full | Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues |
title_fullStr | Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues |
title_full_unstemmed | Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues |
title_short | Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues |
title_sort | disposable duodenoscopes: evidence and open issues |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13081694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conticlarabenedetta disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues AT cereattifabrizio disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues AT salernoraffaele disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues AT grassiaroberto disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues AT scaravagliomiki disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues AT laurenzacarmen disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues AT dinellimarcoemilio disposableduodenoscopesevidenceandopenissues |