Cargando…

Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure

OBJECTIVES: Prediction of pediatric emergency department (PED) workload can allow for optimized allocation of resources to improve patient care and reduce physician burnout. A measure of PED workload is thus required, but to date no variable has been consistently used or could be validated against f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Justin M., McDonald, Erica, Buren, Yijinmide, McInnes, Gord, Doan, Quynh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37624824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290679
_version_ 1785096638952374272
author Park, Justin M.
McDonald, Erica
Buren, Yijinmide
McInnes, Gord
Doan, Quynh
author_facet Park, Justin M.
McDonald, Erica
Buren, Yijinmide
McInnes, Gord
Doan, Quynh
author_sort Park, Justin M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Prediction of pediatric emergency department (PED) workload can allow for optimized allocation of resources to improve patient care and reduce physician burnout. A measure of PED workload is thus required, but to date no variable has been consistently used or could be validated against for this purpose. Billing codes, a variable assigned by physicians to reflect the complexity of medical decision making, have the potential to be a proxy measure of PED workload but must be assessed for reliability. In this study, we investigated how reliably billing codes are assigned by PED physicians, and factors that affect the inter-rater reliability of billing code assignment. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was completed to determine the reliability of billing code assigned by physicians (n = 150) at a quaternary-level PED between January 2018 and December 2018. Clinical visit information was extracted from health records and presented to a billing auditor, who independently assigned a billing code–considered as the criterion standard. Inter-rater reliability was calculated to assess agreement between the physician-assigned versus billing auditor-assigned billing codes. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the association between covariables of interest and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Overall, we found substantial inter-rater reliability (AC(2) 0.72 [95% CI 0.64–0.8]) between the billing codes assigned by physicians compared to those assigned by the billing auditor. Adjusted logistic regression models controlling for Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity scores, disposition, and time of day suggest that clinical trainee involvement is significantly associated with increased inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Our work identified that there is substantial agreement between PED physician and a billing auditor assigned billing codes, and thus are reliably assigned by PED physicians. This is a crucial step in validating billing codes as a potential proxy measure of pediatric emergency physician workload.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104561982023-08-26 Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure Park, Justin M. McDonald, Erica Buren, Yijinmide McInnes, Gord Doan, Quynh PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Prediction of pediatric emergency department (PED) workload can allow for optimized allocation of resources to improve patient care and reduce physician burnout. A measure of PED workload is thus required, but to date no variable has been consistently used or could be validated against for this purpose. Billing codes, a variable assigned by physicians to reflect the complexity of medical decision making, have the potential to be a proxy measure of PED workload but must be assessed for reliability. In this study, we investigated how reliably billing codes are assigned by PED physicians, and factors that affect the inter-rater reliability of billing code assignment. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was completed to determine the reliability of billing code assigned by physicians (n = 150) at a quaternary-level PED between January 2018 and December 2018. Clinical visit information was extracted from health records and presented to a billing auditor, who independently assigned a billing code–considered as the criterion standard. Inter-rater reliability was calculated to assess agreement between the physician-assigned versus billing auditor-assigned billing codes. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the association between covariables of interest and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Overall, we found substantial inter-rater reliability (AC(2) 0.72 [95% CI 0.64–0.8]) between the billing codes assigned by physicians compared to those assigned by the billing auditor. Adjusted logistic regression models controlling for Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity scores, disposition, and time of day suggest that clinical trainee involvement is significantly associated with increased inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Our work identified that there is substantial agreement between PED physician and a billing auditor assigned billing codes, and thus are reliably assigned by PED physicians. This is a crucial step in validating billing codes as a potential proxy measure of pediatric emergency physician workload. Public Library of Science 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10456198/ /pubmed/37624824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290679 Text en © 2023 Park et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Justin M.
McDonald, Erica
Buren, Yijinmide
McInnes, Gord
Doan, Quynh
Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
title Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
title_full Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
title_fullStr Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
title_short Assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
title_sort assessing the reliability of pediatric emergency medicine billing code assignment for future consideration as a proxy workload measure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37624824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290679
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjustinm assessingthereliabilityofpediatricemergencymedicinebillingcodeassignmentforfutureconsiderationasaproxyworkloadmeasure
AT mcdonalderica assessingthereliabilityofpediatricemergencymedicinebillingcodeassignmentforfutureconsiderationasaproxyworkloadmeasure
AT burenyijinmide assessingthereliabilityofpediatricemergencymedicinebillingcodeassignmentforfutureconsiderationasaproxyworkloadmeasure
AT mcinnesgord assessingthereliabilityofpediatricemergencymedicinebillingcodeassignmentforfutureconsiderationasaproxyworkloadmeasure
AT doanquynh assessingthereliabilityofpediatricemergencymedicinebillingcodeassignmentforfutureconsiderationasaproxyworkloadmeasure