Cargando…

Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure

In terms of production technology, metal–ceramic systems for dental restorations comply with a concrete algorithm, the efficiency of which is always dependent on the applications for which they are intended. The first stage involves obtaining metal support, followed by firing the ceramic on the surf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawod, Nazem, Miculescu, Marian, Antoniac, Iulian Vasile, Miculescu, Florin, Agop-Forna, Doriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16165556
_version_ 1785096659038896128
author Dawod, Nazem
Miculescu, Marian
Antoniac, Iulian Vasile
Miculescu, Florin
Agop-Forna, Doriana
author_facet Dawod, Nazem
Miculescu, Marian
Antoniac, Iulian Vasile
Miculescu, Florin
Agop-Forna, Doriana
author_sort Dawod, Nazem
collection PubMed
description In terms of production technology, metal–ceramic systems for dental restorations comply with a concrete algorithm, the efficiency of which is always dependent on the applications for which they are intended. The first stage involves obtaining metal support, followed by firing the ceramic on the surface of the metal to meet the list of functional and aesthetic requirements of a future restoration. The compatibility of the two materials—the metal component and the ceramic component—must be ensured in several respects: chemical compatibility, thermo–chemical compatibility, and mechanical compatibility. Thus, there is a need to simulate the thermal behavior of the metal–ceramic couple in its processing to achieve appropriate dental prostheses. In this study, three types of Co–Cr metal frames were manufactured using three different production technologies: conventional casting, milling (CAM), and selective laser melting (SLM). Composition analyses, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and microstructural analyses of the metal–ceramic interface for each type of production technology, as well as the determination of the hardness and the thermal expansion coefficients of experimental materials and three-point bending tests, were carried out in this study. Considering all these aspects, we demonstrated the influence of the technology of producing the metallic part of the metal–ceramic bonding process in dental prostheses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104562822023-08-26 Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure Dawod, Nazem Miculescu, Marian Antoniac, Iulian Vasile Miculescu, Florin Agop-Forna, Doriana Materials (Basel) Article In terms of production technology, metal–ceramic systems for dental restorations comply with a concrete algorithm, the efficiency of which is always dependent on the applications for which they are intended. The first stage involves obtaining metal support, followed by firing the ceramic on the surface of the metal to meet the list of functional and aesthetic requirements of a future restoration. The compatibility of the two materials—the metal component and the ceramic component—must be ensured in several respects: chemical compatibility, thermo–chemical compatibility, and mechanical compatibility. Thus, there is a need to simulate the thermal behavior of the metal–ceramic couple in its processing to achieve appropriate dental prostheses. In this study, three types of Co–Cr metal frames were manufactured using three different production technologies: conventional casting, milling (CAM), and selective laser melting (SLM). Composition analyses, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and microstructural analyses of the metal–ceramic interface for each type of production technology, as well as the determination of the hardness and the thermal expansion coefficients of experimental materials and three-point bending tests, were carried out in this study. Considering all these aspects, we demonstrated the influence of the technology of producing the metallic part of the metal–ceramic bonding process in dental prostheses. MDPI 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10456282/ /pubmed/37629847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16165556 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dawod, Nazem
Miculescu, Marian
Antoniac, Iulian Vasile
Miculescu, Florin
Agop-Forna, Doriana
Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure
title Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure
title_full Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure
title_fullStr Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure
title_short Metal–Ceramic Compatibility in Dental Restorations According to the Metallic Component Manufacturing Procedure
title_sort metal–ceramic compatibility in dental restorations according to the metallic component manufacturing procedure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16165556
work_keys_str_mv AT dawodnazem metalceramiccompatibilityindentalrestorationsaccordingtothemetalliccomponentmanufacturingprocedure
AT miculescumarian metalceramiccompatibilityindentalrestorationsaccordingtothemetalliccomponentmanufacturingprocedure
AT antoniaciulianvasile metalceramiccompatibilityindentalrestorationsaccordingtothemetalliccomponentmanufacturingprocedure
AT miculescuflorin metalceramiccompatibilityindentalrestorationsaccordingtothemetalliccomponentmanufacturingprocedure
AT agopfornadoriana metalceramiccompatibilityindentalrestorationsaccordingtothemetalliccomponentmanufacturingprocedure