Cargando…

Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation

Modernization of wastewater treatment plants is usually caused by their significant wear and changes in the flow rate and concentration of pollutants. If there is no initial data on the flow or pollution, their determination by calculation is required, which may lead to an increase in concentration....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Makisha, Nikolay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080746
_version_ 1785096710072041472
author Makisha, Nikolay
author_facet Makisha, Nikolay
author_sort Makisha, Nikolay
collection PubMed
description Modernization of wastewater treatment plants is usually caused by their significant wear and changes in the flow rate and concentration of pollutants. If there is no initial data on the flow or pollution, their determination by calculation is required, which may lead to an increase in concentration. Within the study, the modernization of treatment facilities was estimated under conditions of reduced flow and increased pollution concentration. Calculations were carried out both manually and using the CapdetWorks software package. The focus was on secondary treatment facilities as the main element of the municipal wastewater treatment plant within their upgrade from only organic pollutants removal (plug–flow reactor) to removal of both organic pollutants and nutrients (technology of the University of Cape Town). The calculations of tank volumes have shown that the concentration of pollutants has a much greater impact on them than the change in flow, especially when improvement in the treatment quality is required. The study revealed that membrane sludge separation allows tanks to be reduced in volume by 1.5–2.5 times (depending on the value of mixed liquor suspended solids) in comparison with gravity separation, which means smaller capital costs. However, membrane application requires significant energy costs for membrane aeration. For the initial data of the study, the specific energy costs for aeration before the upgrade, after the upgrade (gravity separation), and after the upgrade (membrane separation) were 0.12 kWh/m(3), 0.235 kWh/m(3), and 0.3 kWh/m(3), respectively. If the membrane lifetime is 10 years, membrane costs were determined to be 10–15% of the energy costs for aeration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104564822023-08-26 Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation Makisha, Nikolay Membranes (Basel) Article Modernization of wastewater treatment plants is usually caused by their significant wear and changes in the flow rate and concentration of pollutants. If there is no initial data on the flow or pollution, their determination by calculation is required, which may lead to an increase in concentration. Within the study, the modernization of treatment facilities was estimated under conditions of reduced flow and increased pollution concentration. Calculations were carried out both manually and using the CapdetWorks software package. The focus was on secondary treatment facilities as the main element of the municipal wastewater treatment plant within their upgrade from only organic pollutants removal (plug–flow reactor) to removal of both organic pollutants and nutrients (technology of the University of Cape Town). The calculations of tank volumes have shown that the concentration of pollutants has a much greater impact on them than the change in flow, especially when improvement in the treatment quality is required. The study revealed that membrane sludge separation allows tanks to be reduced in volume by 1.5–2.5 times (depending on the value of mixed liquor suspended solids) in comparison with gravity separation, which means smaller capital costs. However, membrane application requires significant energy costs for membrane aeration. For the initial data of the study, the specific energy costs for aeration before the upgrade, after the upgrade (gravity separation), and after the upgrade (membrane separation) were 0.12 kWh/m(3), 0.235 kWh/m(3), and 0.3 kWh/m(3), respectively. If the membrane lifetime is 10 years, membrane costs were determined to be 10–15% of the energy costs for aeration. MDPI 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10456482/ /pubmed/37623807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080746 Text en © 2023 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Makisha, Nikolay
Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
title Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
title_full Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
title_fullStr Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
title_short Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
title_sort assessment of wastewater treatment plant upgrading with mbr implementation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080746
work_keys_str_mv AT makishanikolay assessmentofwastewatertreatmentplantupgradingwithmbrimplementation