Cargando…

Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach, which utilizes the interval between the tensor fasciae latae posteriorly, offers several advantages, such as the reduced risk of nerve injury and the freedom to choose various implants. Herein, we aimed to compare the outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Jae Suk, Kang, Min Wook, Lee, Dong Hwan, Kim, Ji Wan, Kim, Chul-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081390
_version_ 1785096713900392448
author Chang, Jae Suk
Kang, Min Wook
Lee, Dong Hwan
Kim, Ji Wan
Kim, Chul-Ho
author_facet Chang, Jae Suk
Kang, Min Wook
Lee, Dong Hwan
Kim, Ji Wan
Kim, Chul-Ho
author_sort Chang, Jae Suk
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach, which utilizes the interval between the tensor fasciae latae posteriorly, offers several advantages, such as the reduced risk of nerve injury and the freedom to choose various implants. Herein, we aimed to compare the outcome of ABMS to the direct anterior (DA) approach using pairwise meta-analysis techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PUBMED), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed for studies published up to 7 June 2023, which compared the ABMS approach with the DA approach for hip arthroplasty. We compared (1) perioperative outcomes (operation time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total opioid consumption, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the number of patients discharged to their homes); (2) postoperative complications (neuropraxia/nerve injury, dislocation, surgical site infection, intraoperative fracture, and reoperation rate); and (3) implant position (cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem alignment). Results: Ten studies were eligible for meta-analysis, including 1737 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with the ABMS approach and 1979 with the DA approach. The pooled analysis showed no differences in all outcome variables, including perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and the implant position between the two surgical approaches. Conclusions: In current meta-analysis, the ABMS approach demonstrated comparable results to the conventional DA approach in terms of both clinical and radiologic outcomes as well as postoperative complications. Furthermore, the ABMS approach has the advantage of a broader indication and fewer limitations in terms of the surgical position compared to the DA approach. Therefore, the ABMS approach can be even more beneficial as an option within MSA, surpassing the utility of the DA approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104564982023-08-26 Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis Chang, Jae Suk Kang, Min Wook Lee, Dong Hwan Kim, Ji Wan Kim, Chul-Ho Medicina (Kaunas) Systematic Review Background and Objectives: The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach, which utilizes the interval between the tensor fasciae latae posteriorly, offers several advantages, such as the reduced risk of nerve injury and the freedom to choose various implants. Herein, we aimed to compare the outcome of ABMS to the direct anterior (DA) approach using pairwise meta-analysis techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PUBMED), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed for studies published up to 7 June 2023, which compared the ABMS approach with the DA approach for hip arthroplasty. We compared (1) perioperative outcomes (operation time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total opioid consumption, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the number of patients discharged to their homes); (2) postoperative complications (neuropraxia/nerve injury, dislocation, surgical site infection, intraoperative fracture, and reoperation rate); and (3) implant position (cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem alignment). Results: Ten studies were eligible for meta-analysis, including 1737 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with the ABMS approach and 1979 with the DA approach. The pooled analysis showed no differences in all outcome variables, including perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and the implant position between the two surgical approaches. Conclusions: In current meta-analysis, the ABMS approach demonstrated comparable results to the conventional DA approach in terms of both clinical and radiologic outcomes as well as postoperative complications. Furthermore, the ABMS approach has the advantage of a broader indication and fewer limitations in terms of the surgical position compared to the DA approach. Therefore, the ABMS approach can be even more beneficial as an option within MSA, surpassing the utility of the DA approach. MDPI 2023-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10456498/ /pubmed/37629680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081390 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Chang, Jae Suk
Kang, Min Wook
Lee, Dong Hwan
Kim, Ji Wan
Kim, Chul-Ho
Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
title Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparing the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach with the direct anterior approach in hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081390
work_keys_str_mv AT changjaesuk comparingtheanteriorbasedmusclesparingapproachwiththedirectanteriorapproachinhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandpairwisemetaanalysis
AT kangminwook comparingtheanteriorbasedmusclesparingapproachwiththedirectanteriorapproachinhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandpairwisemetaanalysis
AT leedonghwan comparingtheanteriorbasedmusclesparingapproachwiththedirectanteriorapproachinhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandpairwisemetaanalysis
AT kimjiwan comparingtheanteriorbasedmusclesparingapproachwiththedirectanteriorapproachinhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandpairwisemetaanalysis
AT kimchulho comparingtheanteriorbasedmusclesparingapproachwiththedirectanteriorapproachinhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandpairwisemetaanalysis