Cargando…

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study

Introduction: Tissue conditioners have been widely used in various clinical applications in dentistry, such as treating inflamed alveolar ridges, temporarily relining partial and complete dentures, and the acquisition of functional impressions for denture fabrication. This study aimed to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikulewicz, Marcin, Chojnacka, Katarzyna, Raszewski, Zbigniew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081359
_version_ 1785096760821022720
author Mikulewicz, Marcin
Chojnacka, Katarzyna
Raszewski, Zbigniew
author_facet Mikulewicz, Marcin
Chojnacka, Katarzyna
Raszewski, Zbigniew
author_sort Mikulewicz, Marcin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Tissue conditioners have been widely used in various clinical applications in dentistry, such as treating inflamed alveolar ridges, temporarily relining partial and complete dentures, and the acquisition of functional impressions for denture fabrication. This study aimed to investigate the mechanical properties of the most prevalent tissue conditioner materials on the market, including Tissue Conditioners (TC), Visco Gel (VG), and FITT (F). Materials and Methods: The three tissue conditioners, TC, VG, and F, were assessed based on the parameters mentioned above. The following tests were performed based on the ISO 10139-1 and ISO 10139-2 requirements: Shore A hardness, denture plate adhesion, sorption, water solubility, and contraction after 1 and 3 days in water. Additional tests are described in the literature, such as ethanol content and gelling time. The tests were carried out by storing the materials in water at 37 °C for 7 days. Results: The gel times of all tested materials exceeded 5 min (TC = 300 [s], VG = 350 [s]). In vitro, phthalate-free materials exhibited higher dissolution in water after 14 days (VG = −260.78 ± 11.31 µg/mm(2)) compared to F (−76.12 ± 7.11 µg/mm(2)) and experienced faster hardening when stored in distilled water (F = 33.4 ± 0.30 Sh. A, VG = 59.2 ± 0.60 Sh. A). They also showed greater contractions. The connection of all materials to the prosthesis plate was consistent at 0.11 MPa. The highest counterbalance after 3 days was observed in TC = 3.53 ± 1.12%. Conclusions: Materials containing plasticizers that are not phthalates have worse mechanical properties than products containing these substances. Since phthalates are not allowed to be used indefinitely in medical devices, additional research is necessary, especially in vivo, to develop safe materials with superior functional properties to newer-generation alternatives. In vitro results often do not agree fully with those of in vivo outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104566932023-08-26 Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study Mikulewicz, Marcin Chojnacka, Katarzyna Raszewski, Zbigniew Medicina (Kaunas) Article Introduction: Tissue conditioners have been widely used in various clinical applications in dentistry, such as treating inflamed alveolar ridges, temporarily relining partial and complete dentures, and the acquisition of functional impressions for denture fabrication. This study aimed to investigate the mechanical properties of the most prevalent tissue conditioner materials on the market, including Tissue Conditioners (TC), Visco Gel (VG), and FITT (F). Materials and Methods: The three tissue conditioners, TC, VG, and F, were assessed based on the parameters mentioned above. The following tests were performed based on the ISO 10139-1 and ISO 10139-2 requirements: Shore A hardness, denture plate adhesion, sorption, water solubility, and contraction after 1 and 3 days in water. Additional tests are described in the literature, such as ethanol content and gelling time. The tests were carried out by storing the materials in water at 37 °C for 7 days. Results: The gel times of all tested materials exceeded 5 min (TC = 300 [s], VG = 350 [s]). In vitro, phthalate-free materials exhibited higher dissolution in water after 14 days (VG = −260.78 ± 11.31 µg/mm(2)) compared to F (−76.12 ± 7.11 µg/mm(2)) and experienced faster hardening when stored in distilled water (F = 33.4 ± 0.30 Sh. A, VG = 59.2 ± 0.60 Sh. A). They also showed greater contractions. The connection of all materials to the prosthesis plate was consistent at 0.11 MPa. The highest counterbalance after 3 days was observed in TC = 3.53 ± 1.12%. Conclusions: Materials containing plasticizers that are not phthalates have worse mechanical properties than products containing these substances. Since phthalates are not allowed to be used indefinitely in medical devices, additional research is necessary, especially in vivo, to develop safe materials with superior functional properties to newer-generation alternatives. In vitro results often do not agree fully with those of in vivo outcomes. MDPI 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10456693/ /pubmed/37629649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081359 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mikulewicz, Marcin
Chojnacka, Katarzyna
Raszewski, Zbigniew
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study
title Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Three Tissue Conditioners: An Evaluation In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of mechanical properties of three tissue conditioners: an evaluation in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081359
work_keys_str_mv AT mikulewiczmarcin comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofthreetissueconditionersanevaluationinvitrostudy
AT chojnackakatarzyna comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofthreetissueconditionersanevaluationinvitrostudy
AT raszewskizbigniew comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofthreetissueconditionersanevaluationinvitrostudy