Cargando…

The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors

The established classical method of treating oil refinery effluent is flotation followed by biological treatment. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) offer more advanced treatment, producing a clarified and potentially reusable treated effluent, but demand robust pretreatment to remove oil and grease (O&...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan, Raheem, Adil Mohammed, Judd, Simon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715
_version_ 1785096820069761024
author Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
Raheem, Adil Mohammed
Judd, Simon J.
author_facet Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
Raheem, Adil Mohammed
Judd, Simon J.
author_sort Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
collection PubMed
description The established classical method of treating oil refinery effluent is flotation followed by biological treatment. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) offer more advanced treatment, producing a clarified and potentially reusable treated effluent, but demand robust pretreatment to remove oil and grease (O&G) down to consistent, reliably low levels. An analysis of a full-scale conventional oil refinery ETP (effluent treatment plant) based on flotation alone, coupled with projected performance, energy consumption and costs associated with a downstream MBR, have demonstrated satisfactory performance of flotation-based pretreatment. The flotation processes, comprising an API (American Petroleum Institute) separator followed by dissolved air flotation (DAF), provided ~90% removal of both total suspended solids (TSS) and O&G coupled with 75% COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal. The relative energy consumption and cost of the pretreatment, normalised against both the volume treated and COD removed, was considerably less for the API-DAF sequence compared to the MBR. The combined flotation specific energy consumption in kWh was found to be almost an order of magnitude lower than for the MBR (0.091 vs. 0.86 kWh per m(3) effluent treated), and the total cost (in terms of the net present value) around one sixth that of the MBR. However, the nature of the respective waste streams generated and the end disposal of waste solids differ significantly between the pretreatment and MBR stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104569402023-08-26 The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Raheem, Adil Mohammed Judd, Simon J. Membranes (Basel) Article The established classical method of treating oil refinery effluent is flotation followed by biological treatment. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) offer more advanced treatment, producing a clarified and potentially reusable treated effluent, but demand robust pretreatment to remove oil and grease (O&G) down to consistent, reliably low levels. An analysis of a full-scale conventional oil refinery ETP (effluent treatment plant) based on flotation alone, coupled with projected performance, energy consumption and costs associated with a downstream MBR, have demonstrated satisfactory performance of flotation-based pretreatment. The flotation processes, comprising an API (American Petroleum Institute) separator followed by dissolved air flotation (DAF), provided ~90% removal of both total suspended solids (TSS) and O&G coupled with 75% COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal. The relative energy consumption and cost of the pretreatment, normalised against both the volume treated and COD removed, was considerably less for the API-DAF sequence compared to the MBR. The combined flotation specific energy consumption in kWh was found to be almost an order of magnitude lower than for the MBR (0.091 vs. 0.86 kWh per m(3) effluent treated), and the total cost (in terms of the net present value) around one sixth that of the MBR. However, the nature of the respective waste streams generated and the end disposal of waste solids differ significantly between the pretreatment and MBR stages. MDPI 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10456940/ /pubmed/37623776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
Raheem, Adil Mohammed
Judd, Simon J.
The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
title The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
title_full The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
title_fullStr The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
title_full_unstemmed The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
title_short The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
title_sort cost benefit of refinery effluent pretreatment upstream of membrane bioreactors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715
work_keys_str_mv AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan thecostbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors
AT raheemadilmohammed thecostbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors
AT juddsimonj thecostbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors
AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan costbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors
AT raheemadilmohammed costbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors
AT juddsimonj costbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors