Cargando…
The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors
The established classical method of treating oil refinery effluent is flotation followed by biological treatment. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) offer more advanced treatment, producing a clarified and potentially reusable treated effluent, but demand robust pretreatment to remove oil and grease (O&...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715 |
_version_ | 1785096820069761024 |
---|---|
author | Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Raheem, Adil Mohammed Judd, Simon J. |
author_facet | Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Raheem, Adil Mohammed Judd, Simon J. |
author_sort | Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The established classical method of treating oil refinery effluent is flotation followed by biological treatment. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) offer more advanced treatment, producing a clarified and potentially reusable treated effluent, but demand robust pretreatment to remove oil and grease (O&G) down to consistent, reliably low levels. An analysis of a full-scale conventional oil refinery ETP (effluent treatment plant) based on flotation alone, coupled with projected performance, energy consumption and costs associated with a downstream MBR, have demonstrated satisfactory performance of flotation-based pretreatment. The flotation processes, comprising an API (American Petroleum Institute) separator followed by dissolved air flotation (DAF), provided ~90% removal of both total suspended solids (TSS) and O&G coupled with 75% COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal. The relative energy consumption and cost of the pretreatment, normalised against both the volume treated and COD removed, was considerably less for the API-DAF sequence compared to the MBR. The combined flotation specific energy consumption in kWh was found to be almost an order of magnitude lower than for the MBR (0.091 vs. 0.86 kWh per m(3) effluent treated), and the total cost (in terms of the net present value) around one sixth that of the MBR. However, the nature of the respective waste streams generated and the end disposal of waste solids differ significantly between the pretreatment and MBR stages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10456940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104569402023-08-26 The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Raheem, Adil Mohammed Judd, Simon J. Membranes (Basel) Article The established classical method of treating oil refinery effluent is flotation followed by biological treatment. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) offer more advanced treatment, producing a clarified and potentially reusable treated effluent, but demand robust pretreatment to remove oil and grease (O&G) down to consistent, reliably low levels. An analysis of a full-scale conventional oil refinery ETP (effluent treatment plant) based on flotation alone, coupled with projected performance, energy consumption and costs associated with a downstream MBR, have demonstrated satisfactory performance of flotation-based pretreatment. The flotation processes, comprising an API (American Petroleum Institute) separator followed by dissolved air flotation (DAF), provided ~90% removal of both total suspended solids (TSS) and O&G coupled with 75% COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal. The relative energy consumption and cost of the pretreatment, normalised against both the volume treated and COD removed, was considerably less for the API-DAF sequence compared to the MBR. The combined flotation specific energy consumption in kWh was found to be almost an order of magnitude lower than for the MBR (0.091 vs. 0.86 kWh per m(3) effluent treated), and the total cost (in terms of the net present value) around one sixth that of the MBR. However, the nature of the respective waste streams generated and the end disposal of waste solids differ significantly between the pretreatment and MBR stages. MDPI 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10456940/ /pubmed/37623776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Raheem, Adil Mohammed Judd, Simon J. The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors |
title | The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors |
title_full | The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors |
title_fullStr | The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors |
title_full_unstemmed | The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors |
title_short | The Cost Benefit of Refinery Effluent Pretreatment Upstream of Membrane Bioreactors |
title_sort | cost benefit of refinery effluent pretreatment upstream of membrane bioreactors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan thecostbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors AT raheemadilmohammed thecostbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors AT juddsimonj thecostbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan costbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors AT raheemadilmohammed costbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors AT juddsimonj costbenefitofrefineryeffluentpretreatmentupstreamofmembranebioreactors |