Cargando…

Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects

Background and Objectives: During the COVID-19, the demand for non-invasive ventilatory support equipment significantly increased. In response, a novel non-invasive ventilatory support model called CPAP-AirFlife™ was developed utilizing existing technologies. This model offers technological advantag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinoco, Héctor A., Perdomo-Hurtado, Luis, Henao-Cruz, Joismer A., Escobar-Serna, José F., Jaramillo-Robledo, Oscar, Aguirre-Ospina, Oscar D., Hurtado-Hernández, Mateo, Lopez-Guzman, Juliana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081372
_version_ 1785096822715318272
author Tinoco, Héctor A.
Perdomo-Hurtado, Luis
Henao-Cruz, Joismer A.
Escobar-Serna, José F.
Jaramillo-Robledo, Oscar
Aguirre-Ospina, Oscar D.
Hurtado-Hernández, Mateo
Lopez-Guzman, Juliana
author_facet Tinoco, Héctor A.
Perdomo-Hurtado, Luis
Henao-Cruz, Joismer A.
Escobar-Serna, José F.
Jaramillo-Robledo, Oscar
Aguirre-Ospina, Oscar D.
Hurtado-Hernández, Mateo
Lopez-Guzman, Juliana
author_sort Tinoco, Héctor A.
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: During the COVID-19, the demand for non-invasive ventilatory support equipment significantly increased. In response, a novel non-invasive ventilatory support model called CPAP-AirFlife™ was developed utilizing existing technologies. This model offers technological advantages, including an aerosol-controlled helmet suitable for high-risk environments such as ambulances. Additionally, it is cost-effective and does not require medical air, making it accessible for implementation in low-level hospitals, particularly in rural areas. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of CPAP-AirFlife™ by conducting a non-inferiority comparison with conventional ventilation equipment used in the Intensive Care Unit. Materials and Methods: A clinical study was conducted on normal subjects in a randomized and sequential manner. Parameters such as hemoglobin oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, exhaled PCO(2) levels, vital signs, and individual tolerance were compared between the CPAP-AirFlife™ and conventional equipment. The study population was described in terms of demographic characteristics and included in the analysis. Results: It was shown that the CPAP-AirFlife™ was not inferior to conventional equipment in terms of efficacy or tolerability. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation levels, exhaled PCO(2) levels, vital signs, and individual tolerance did not significantly differ between the two models. Conclusions: The findings suggest that CPAP-AirFlife™ is a practical and cost-effective alternative for non-invasive ventilatory support. Its technological advantages, including the aerosol-controlled helmet, make it suitable for high-risk environments. The device’s accessibility and affordability make it a promising solution for implementation in low-level hospitals, particularly in rural areas. This study supports using CPAP-AirFlife™ as a practical option for non-invasive ventilatory support, providing a valuable contribution to respiratory care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104569512023-08-26 Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects Tinoco, Héctor A. Perdomo-Hurtado, Luis Henao-Cruz, Joismer A. Escobar-Serna, José F. Jaramillo-Robledo, Oscar Aguirre-Ospina, Oscar D. Hurtado-Hernández, Mateo Lopez-Guzman, Juliana Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: During the COVID-19, the demand for non-invasive ventilatory support equipment significantly increased. In response, a novel non-invasive ventilatory support model called CPAP-AirFlife™ was developed utilizing existing technologies. This model offers technological advantages, including an aerosol-controlled helmet suitable for high-risk environments such as ambulances. Additionally, it is cost-effective and does not require medical air, making it accessible for implementation in low-level hospitals, particularly in rural areas. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of CPAP-AirFlife™ by conducting a non-inferiority comparison with conventional ventilation equipment used in the Intensive Care Unit. Materials and Methods: A clinical study was conducted on normal subjects in a randomized and sequential manner. Parameters such as hemoglobin oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, exhaled PCO(2) levels, vital signs, and individual tolerance were compared between the CPAP-AirFlife™ and conventional equipment. The study population was described in terms of demographic characteristics and included in the analysis. Results: It was shown that the CPAP-AirFlife™ was not inferior to conventional equipment in terms of efficacy or tolerability. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation levels, exhaled PCO(2) levels, vital signs, and individual tolerance did not significantly differ between the two models. Conclusions: The findings suggest that CPAP-AirFlife™ is a practical and cost-effective alternative for non-invasive ventilatory support. Its technological advantages, including the aerosol-controlled helmet, make it suitable for high-risk environments. The device’s accessibility and affordability make it a promising solution for implementation in low-level hospitals, particularly in rural areas. This study supports using CPAP-AirFlife™ as a practical option for non-invasive ventilatory support, providing a valuable contribution to respiratory care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. MDPI 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10456951/ /pubmed/37629662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081372 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tinoco, Héctor A.
Perdomo-Hurtado, Luis
Henao-Cruz, Joismer A.
Escobar-Serna, José F.
Jaramillo-Robledo, Oscar
Aguirre-Ospina, Oscar D.
Hurtado-Hernández, Mateo
Lopez-Guzman, Juliana
Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects
title Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects
title_full Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects
title_fullStr Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects
title_short Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects
title_sort evaluation and performance of a positive airway pressure device (cpap-airflife™): a randomized crossover non-inferiority clinical study in normal subjects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081372
work_keys_str_mv AT tinocohectora evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT perdomohurtadoluis evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT henaocruzjoismera evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT escobarsernajosef evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT jaramillorobledooscar evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT aguirreospinaoscard evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT hurtadohernandezmateo evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects
AT lopezguzmanjuliana evaluationandperformanceofapositiveairwaypressuredevicecpapairflifearandomizedcrossovernoninferiorityclinicalstudyinnormalsubjects