Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results

Background: A prospective multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial was performed to digitally analyze tissue volume changes in immediately and early placed implants with simultaneous bone augmentation restored with two different all-ceramic materials. Methods: A total of 60 patients receive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strasding, Malin, Jeong, Yuwon, Marchand, Laurent, Hicklin, Stefan P., Sailer, Irena, Sun, Minji, Lee, Hyeonjong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16165636
_version_ 1785096829188177920
author Strasding, Malin
Jeong, Yuwon
Marchand, Laurent
Hicklin, Stefan P.
Sailer, Irena
Sun, Minji
Lee, Hyeonjong
author_facet Strasding, Malin
Jeong, Yuwon
Marchand, Laurent
Hicklin, Stefan P.
Sailer, Irena
Sun, Minji
Lee, Hyeonjong
author_sort Strasding, Malin
collection PubMed
description Background: A prospective multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial was performed to digitally analyze tissue volume changes in immediately and early placed implants with simultaneous bone augmentation restored with two different all-ceramic materials. Methods: A total of 60 patients received 60 bone-level tapered implants (BLT, Straumann AG) immediately (n = 30) or early placed, 8–10 weeks after tooth extraction, (n = 30). Implants were restored with all-ceramic single crowns fabricated out of zirconia (Lava Plus, 3M), or lithium disilicate (E.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) bonded to titanium base abutments (Variobase for Cerec, Straumann AG). Impressions were taken at baseline (BL), 6 and 12 months, and STL data were used to define an area of interest (AOI) to analyze peri-implant volume changes and midfacial recessions. Results: For immediate placement, a mean volume loss of −5.56 mm(3) (±5.83 mm(3)) was found at 6 months, and of −6.62 mm(3) (±6.56 mm(3)) at 12 months. For early placement, a mean volume loss of −1.99 mm(3) (±5.82 mm(3)) at 6 months, and of −3.7 mm(3) (±5.62 mm(3)) at 12 months was found. The differences in volume loss at 12 months between the two implant placement protocols were significant (p = 0.005). In both groups, mean midfacial recessions of 0.48 mm (±0.52) occurred. Conclusions: A more pronounced peri-implant volume loss can be expected 12 months after immediate implant placement compared with early placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10456968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104569682023-08-26 Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results Strasding, Malin Jeong, Yuwon Marchand, Laurent Hicklin, Stefan P. Sailer, Irena Sun, Minji Lee, Hyeonjong Materials (Basel) Article Background: A prospective multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial was performed to digitally analyze tissue volume changes in immediately and early placed implants with simultaneous bone augmentation restored with two different all-ceramic materials. Methods: A total of 60 patients received 60 bone-level tapered implants (BLT, Straumann AG) immediately (n = 30) or early placed, 8–10 weeks after tooth extraction, (n = 30). Implants were restored with all-ceramic single crowns fabricated out of zirconia (Lava Plus, 3M), or lithium disilicate (E.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) bonded to titanium base abutments (Variobase for Cerec, Straumann AG). Impressions were taken at baseline (BL), 6 and 12 months, and STL data were used to define an area of interest (AOI) to analyze peri-implant volume changes and midfacial recessions. Results: For immediate placement, a mean volume loss of −5.56 mm(3) (±5.83 mm(3)) was found at 6 months, and of −6.62 mm(3) (±6.56 mm(3)) at 12 months. For early placement, a mean volume loss of −1.99 mm(3) (±5.82 mm(3)) at 6 months, and of −3.7 mm(3) (±5.62 mm(3)) at 12 months was found. The differences in volume loss at 12 months between the two implant placement protocols were significant (p = 0.005). In both groups, mean midfacial recessions of 0.48 mm (±0.52) occurred. Conclusions: A more pronounced peri-implant volume loss can be expected 12 months after immediate implant placement compared with early placement. MDPI 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10456968/ /pubmed/37629928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16165636 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Strasding, Malin
Jeong, Yuwon
Marchand, Laurent
Hicklin, Stefan P.
Sailer, Irena
Sun, Minji
Lee, Hyeonjong
Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results
title Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results
title_full Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results
title_short Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials—1 Year Results
title_sort three-dimensional peri-implant tissue changes in immediately vs. early placed tapered implants restored with two different ceramic materials—1 year results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37629928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16165636
work_keys_str_mv AT strasdingmalin threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults
AT jeongyuwon threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults
AT marchandlaurent threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults
AT hicklinstefanp threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults
AT sailerirena threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults
AT sunminji threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults
AT leehyeonjong threedimensionalperiimplanttissuechangesinimmediatelyvsearlyplacedtaperedimplantsrestoredwithtwodifferentceramicmaterials1yearresults