Cargando…

Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of drip and ship (DS) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing three treatment strategies: 1) patients seen at a primary stroke center, started on emergency intravenous thrombolysis and then transported to a compre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Fucheng, Yin, Wenpeng, Jia, Jianwen, Zhong, Hongliang, Yang, Hongchao, Huang, Jvmei, Wang, Yang, Liu, Yunpeng, Liu, He
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19113
_version_ 1785096926751883264
author Jiang, Fucheng
Yin, Wenpeng
Jia, Jianwen
Zhong, Hongliang
Yang, Hongchao
Huang, Jvmei
Wang, Yang
Liu, Yunpeng
Liu, He
author_facet Jiang, Fucheng
Yin, Wenpeng
Jia, Jianwen
Zhong, Hongliang
Yang, Hongchao
Huang, Jvmei
Wang, Yang
Liu, Yunpeng
Liu, He
author_sort Jiang, Fucheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of drip and ship (DS) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing three treatment strategies: 1) patients seen at a primary stroke center, started on emergency intravenous thrombolysis and then transported to a comprehensive stroke center (drip and ship, DS); 2) patients immediately transferred to comprehensive stroke center without starting intravenous thrombolysis, for mechanical thrombectomy (non-drip and ship, non-DS); and 3) patients admitted directly to the comprehensive stroke center for assessment and subsequent bridging thrombolysis (mothership, MS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy for AIS from November 2020 to May 2022 at our institution. Patients were divided into three groups: DS, non-DS, and MS. Time course, multimodal CT features and clinical results were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients, with 19, 18, and 25 patients in DS, non-DS, and MS groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ among the three groups. The DS group had a significantly longer median onset to groin time than the MS group (395 min vs 244 min; P < 0.001), a significantly shorter onset to primary stroke center time than the non-DS group (90 min vs 463 min; P < 0.001), and a longer primary stroke center to groin puncture time than the non-DS group (277 min vs 162 min; P = 0.002). The onset to needle time was longer in the MS group than the DS group (151.2 min vs 111.8 min; P = 0.041). The intravenous thrombolysis to puncture time was shorter in the MS group compared with DS (56 min vs 278 min; P < 0.001). No significant differences were present among groups in post-operative variables measured. CONCLUSIONS: DS is a safe and effective method, with no increased risk of postoperative complications or death compared to non-DS and MS methods. The study provides a reference for the selection of transport modes for AIS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10457447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104574472023-08-27 Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods Jiang, Fucheng Yin, Wenpeng Jia, Jianwen Zhong, Hongliang Yang, Hongchao Huang, Jvmei Wang, Yang Liu, Yunpeng Liu, He Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of drip and ship (DS) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing three treatment strategies: 1) patients seen at a primary stroke center, started on emergency intravenous thrombolysis and then transported to a comprehensive stroke center (drip and ship, DS); 2) patients immediately transferred to comprehensive stroke center without starting intravenous thrombolysis, for mechanical thrombectomy (non-drip and ship, non-DS); and 3) patients admitted directly to the comprehensive stroke center for assessment and subsequent bridging thrombolysis (mothership, MS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy for AIS from November 2020 to May 2022 at our institution. Patients were divided into three groups: DS, non-DS, and MS. Time course, multimodal CT features and clinical results were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients, with 19, 18, and 25 patients in DS, non-DS, and MS groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ among the three groups. The DS group had a significantly longer median onset to groin time than the MS group (395 min vs 244 min; P < 0.001), a significantly shorter onset to primary stroke center time than the non-DS group (90 min vs 463 min; P < 0.001), and a longer primary stroke center to groin puncture time than the non-DS group (277 min vs 162 min; P = 0.002). The onset to needle time was longer in the MS group than the DS group (151.2 min vs 111.8 min; P = 0.041). The intravenous thrombolysis to puncture time was shorter in the MS group compared with DS (56 min vs 278 min; P < 0.001). No significant differences were present among groups in post-operative variables measured. CONCLUSIONS: DS is a safe and effective method, with no increased risk of postoperative complications or death compared to non-DS and MS methods. The study provides a reference for the selection of transport modes for AIS patients. Elsevier 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10457447/ /pubmed/37636373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19113 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Jiang, Fucheng
Yin, Wenpeng
Jia, Jianwen
Zhong, Hongliang
Yang, Hongchao
Huang, Jvmei
Wang, Yang
Liu, Yunpeng
Liu, He
Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
title Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
title_full Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
title_short Clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
title_sort clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in different triage methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19113
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangfucheng clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT yinwenpeng clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT jiajianwen clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT zhonghongliang clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT yanghongchao clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT huangjvmei clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT wangyang clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT liuyunpeng clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods
AT liuhe clinicaloutcomesafterendovascularthrombectomyindifferenttriagemethods