Cargando…

Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience

PURPOSE: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led health care systems and providers worldwide to rapidly adopt telehealth solutions to minimize risk and comply with isolation mandates. This article explores telehealth utilization trends in North Carolina (NC) free and charitable clinics—an ambulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakowski, Julie Ann, Parks, Ashley, Nunnery, Danielle, Wear, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0029
_version_ 1785096973664124928
author Sakowski, Julie Ann
Parks, Ashley
Nunnery, Danielle
Wear, Andrew
author_facet Sakowski, Julie Ann
Parks, Ashley
Nunnery, Danielle
Wear, Andrew
author_sort Sakowski, Julie Ann
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led health care systems and providers worldwide to rapidly adopt telehealth solutions to minimize risk and comply with isolation mandates. This article explores telehealth utilization trends in North Carolina (NC) free and charitable clinics—an ambulatory health care delivery setting where traditional third-party reimbursement policies are not a primary consideration. METHODS: We surveyed NC free and charitable clinic administrators regarding clinic decisions to adopt an externally sponsored telehealth system, what services are provided by telehealth, clinic implementation processes, which populations used telehealth, how telehealth was incorporated into current clinic workflows, and perceptions of telehealth outcomes. FINDINGS: Telehealth was rapidly adopted among free and charitable clinics after the COVID-19 outbreak. Reasons for implementing telehealth included the ability to continue providing services during a public health emergency and to increase access to patients. However, clinics report that telehealth utilization has dropped significantly since the initial pandemic surge. Patient and provider preferences for in-person services are a common reason cited for this drop. Free and charitable clinics report a strong interest in continuing to deliver services through telehealth. The majority reported continuing to offer telehealth services, but primarily as a supplement to in-person visits rather than as a replacement. They perceive that implementing telehealth has increased access to care but are less certain about the impact on cost of care and patient satisfaction. However, clinic administrators believe improvements in interoperability with other data systems, workflows, scheduling, and care delivery approaches are needed to achieve telehealth's fullest utilization. CONCLUSION: Telehealth can play a significant role in expanding access to services in the free and charitable clinic setting. However, continued refinements in the technology to facilitate integration with other systems and workflow processes are needed to reach its full potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10457620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104576202023-08-27 Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience Sakowski, Julie Ann Parks, Ashley Nunnery, Danielle Wear, Andrew Telemed Rep Original Research PURPOSE: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led health care systems and providers worldwide to rapidly adopt telehealth solutions to minimize risk and comply with isolation mandates. This article explores telehealth utilization trends in North Carolina (NC) free and charitable clinics—an ambulatory health care delivery setting where traditional third-party reimbursement policies are not a primary consideration. METHODS: We surveyed NC free and charitable clinic administrators regarding clinic decisions to adopt an externally sponsored telehealth system, what services are provided by telehealth, clinic implementation processes, which populations used telehealth, how telehealth was incorporated into current clinic workflows, and perceptions of telehealth outcomes. FINDINGS: Telehealth was rapidly adopted among free and charitable clinics after the COVID-19 outbreak. Reasons for implementing telehealth included the ability to continue providing services during a public health emergency and to increase access to patients. However, clinics report that telehealth utilization has dropped significantly since the initial pandemic surge. Patient and provider preferences for in-person services are a common reason cited for this drop. Free and charitable clinics report a strong interest in continuing to deliver services through telehealth. The majority reported continuing to offer telehealth services, but primarily as a supplement to in-person visits rather than as a replacement. They perceive that implementing telehealth has increased access to care but are less certain about the impact on cost of care and patient satisfaction. However, clinic administrators believe improvements in interoperability with other data systems, workflows, scheduling, and care delivery approaches are needed to achieve telehealth's fullest utilization. CONCLUSION: Telehealth can play a significant role in expanding access to services in the free and charitable clinic setting. However, continued refinements in the technology to facilitate integration with other systems and workflow processes are needed to reach its full potential. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10457620/ /pubmed/37637374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0029 Text en © Julie Sakowski et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sakowski, Julie Ann
Parks, Ashley
Nunnery, Danielle
Wear, Andrew
Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience
title Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience
title_full Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience
title_fullStr Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience
title_full_unstemmed Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience
title_short Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience
title_sort free and charitable clinic telehealth adoption and utilization during the covid-19 era: the north carolina experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0029
work_keys_str_mv AT sakowskijulieann freeandcharitableclinictelehealthadoptionandutilizationduringthecovid19erathenorthcarolinaexperience
AT parksashley freeandcharitableclinictelehealthadoptionandutilizationduringthecovid19erathenorthcarolinaexperience
AT nunnerydanielle freeandcharitableclinictelehealthadoptionandutilizationduringthecovid19erathenorthcarolinaexperience
AT wearandrew freeandcharitableclinictelehealthadoptionandutilizationduringthecovid19erathenorthcarolinaexperience