Cargando…

Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Outcomes are greatly improved if CRC is detected early; hence, screening is currently recommended for adults aged 45 years and older at average risk for the disease. Despite this recommendation and the availability of accu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller Wilson, Lesley-Ann, Browne, Sara, Barnes, Jake, Hoyek, Nancy El, Helmueller, Leah, Joao Janeiro, Maria, Wendt, Barry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0013
_version_ 1785096974117109760
author Miller Wilson, Lesley-Ann
Browne, Sara
Barnes, Jake
Hoyek, Nancy El
Helmueller, Leah
Joao Janeiro, Maria
Wendt, Barry
author_facet Miller Wilson, Lesley-Ann
Browne, Sara
Barnes, Jake
Hoyek, Nancy El
Helmueller, Leah
Joao Janeiro, Maria
Wendt, Barry
author_sort Miller Wilson, Lesley-Ann
collection PubMed
description Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Outcomes are greatly improved if CRC is detected early; hence, screening is currently recommended for adults aged 45 years and older at average risk for the disease. Despite this recommendation and the availability of accurate screening tests, the CRC screening rates are below those recommended. The goal of this study was to identify temporal trends (from 2015 to 2019) in CRC screening rates and the utilization of screening tests recommended for CRC detection among average-risk individuals within the St Elizabeth Healthcare system in Kentucky, United States. The primary population of interest was patients aged 50–75 years (the CRC screening was recommended for this age group at the time of the study). Deidentified data were sourced from patients' electronic health records, and the results showed that screening rates increased significantly from 26% in 2015 to 49% in 2019 (<0.0001). The incidence of any screening test also increased significantly from 2015 to 2019, for those who were due for screening (P < 0.05) and for the entire cohort (P < 0.1). The use of multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) increased 40-fold over the study timeframe (P < 0.05). These study results confirm that CRC screening rates remain suboptimal, although incidence and adherence improved significantly in those aged 50–75 years from 2015 to 2019. The growing adoption and availability of mt-sDNA may be correlated with an increase in overall screening in this average-risk population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10457624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104576242023-08-27 Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer Miller Wilson, Lesley-Ann Browne, Sara Barnes, Jake Hoyek, Nancy El Helmueller, Leah Joao Janeiro, Maria Wendt, Barry Popul Health Manag Original Articles Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Outcomes are greatly improved if CRC is detected early; hence, screening is currently recommended for adults aged 45 years and older at average risk for the disease. Despite this recommendation and the availability of accurate screening tests, the CRC screening rates are below those recommended. The goal of this study was to identify temporal trends (from 2015 to 2019) in CRC screening rates and the utilization of screening tests recommended for CRC detection among average-risk individuals within the St Elizabeth Healthcare system in Kentucky, United States. The primary population of interest was patients aged 50–75 years (the CRC screening was recommended for this age group at the time of the study). Deidentified data were sourced from patients' electronic health records, and the results showed that screening rates increased significantly from 26% in 2015 to 49% in 2019 (<0.0001). The incidence of any screening test also increased significantly from 2015 to 2019, for those who were due for screening (P < 0.05) and for the entire cohort (P < 0.1). The use of multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) increased 40-fold over the study timeframe (P < 0.05). These study results confirm that CRC screening rates remain suboptimal, although incidence and adherence improved significantly in those aged 50–75 years from 2015 to 2019. The growing adoption and availability of mt-sDNA may be correlated with an increase in overall screening in this average-risk population. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-08-01 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10457624/ /pubmed/37498933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0013 Text en © Lesley-Ann Miller Wilson et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Miller Wilson, Lesley-Ann
Browne, Sara
Barnes, Jake
Hoyek, Nancy El
Helmueller, Leah
Joao Janeiro, Maria
Wendt, Barry
Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
title Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
title_full Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
title_short Opportunities and Challenges in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
title_sort opportunities and challenges in screening for colorectal cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0013
work_keys_str_mv AT millerwilsonlesleyann opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer
AT brownesara opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer
AT barnesjake opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer
AT hoyeknancyel opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer
AT helmuellerleah opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer
AT joaojaneiromaria opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer
AT wendtbarry opportunitiesandchallengesinscreeningforcolorectalcancer