Cargando…

The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the time to live birth (TTLB) in poor ovarian responders (POR) according to the Bologna criteria. METHODS: A total of 276 infertile women undergoing IVF with POR were included in this retrospective study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Qiu Lin, Teng, Xiao Ming, Chen, Miao Xin, Li, Kun Ming, Ng, Ernest Hung Yu, Chen, Zhi Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37638350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12533
_version_ 1785096981491744768
author Ge, Qiu Lin
Teng, Xiao Ming
Chen, Miao Xin
Li, Kun Ming
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
Chen, Zhi Qin
author_facet Ge, Qiu Lin
Teng, Xiao Ming
Chen, Miao Xin
Li, Kun Ming
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
Chen, Zhi Qin
author_sort Ge, Qiu Lin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the time to live birth (TTLB) in poor ovarian responders (POR) according to the Bologna criteria. METHODS: A total of 276 infertile women undergoing IVF with POR were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups with (n = 121) or without (n = 155) embryo banking at the discretion of the attending physicians. A total of 656 and 405 stimulation cycles were started in the two groups respectively during the 24 month follow‐up. RESULTS: The biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rate per transfer were comparable between two groups (p > 0.05). The CLBR was significantly lower in the banking group than in the non‐banking group (31.4% (38/121) and 43.2% (67/151), p < 0.05). TTLB was significantly longer in the banking group (20.5 months vs. 16.0 months, p < 0.001). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of live birth was significantly lower in the banking group compared with the non‐banking group (Log rank test, chi‐square = 21.958, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Embryo banking in women undergoing IVF with POR based on the Bologna criteria reduces CLBR and lengthens TTLB when compared with no embryo banking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10457668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104576682023-08-27 The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria Ge, Qiu Lin Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Ng, Ernest Hung Yu Chen, Zhi Qin Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the time to live birth (TTLB) in poor ovarian responders (POR) according to the Bologna criteria. METHODS: A total of 276 infertile women undergoing IVF with POR were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups with (n = 121) or without (n = 155) embryo banking at the discretion of the attending physicians. A total of 656 and 405 stimulation cycles were started in the two groups respectively during the 24 month follow‐up. RESULTS: The biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rate per transfer were comparable between two groups (p > 0.05). The CLBR was significantly lower in the banking group than in the non‐banking group (31.4% (38/121) and 43.2% (67/151), p < 0.05). TTLB was significantly longer in the banking group (20.5 months vs. 16.0 months, p < 0.001). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of live birth was significantly lower in the banking group compared with the non‐banking group (Log rank test, chi‐square = 21.958, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Embryo banking in women undergoing IVF with POR based on the Bologna criteria reduces CLBR and lengthens TTLB when compared with no embryo banking. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10457668/ /pubmed/37638350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12533 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ge, Qiu Lin
Teng, Xiao Ming
Chen, Miao Xin
Li, Kun Ming
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
Chen, Zhi Qin
The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
title The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
title_full The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
title_fullStr The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
title_short The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
title_sort impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the bologna criteria
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37638350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12533
work_keys_str_mv AT geqiulin theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT tengxiaoming theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT chenmiaoxin theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT likunming theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT ngernesthungyu theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT chenzhiqin theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT geqiulin impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT tengxiaoming impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT chenmiaoxin impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT likunming impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT ngernesthungyu impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria
AT chenzhiqin impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria