Cargando…
The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the time to live birth (TTLB) in poor ovarian responders (POR) according to the Bologna criteria. METHODS: A total of 276 infertile women undergoing IVF with POR were included in this retrospective study....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37638350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12533 |
_version_ | 1785096981491744768 |
---|---|
author | Ge, Qiu Lin Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Ng, Ernest Hung Yu Chen, Zhi Qin |
author_facet | Ge, Qiu Lin Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Ng, Ernest Hung Yu Chen, Zhi Qin |
author_sort | Ge, Qiu Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the time to live birth (TTLB) in poor ovarian responders (POR) according to the Bologna criteria. METHODS: A total of 276 infertile women undergoing IVF with POR were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups with (n = 121) or without (n = 155) embryo banking at the discretion of the attending physicians. A total of 656 and 405 stimulation cycles were started in the two groups respectively during the 24 month follow‐up. RESULTS: The biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rate per transfer were comparable between two groups (p > 0.05). The CLBR was significantly lower in the banking group than in the non‐banking group (31.4% (38/121) and 43.2% (67/151), p < 0.05). TTLB was significantly longer in the banking group (20.5 months vs. 16.0 months, p < 0.001). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of live birth was significantly lower in the banking group compared with the non‐banking group (Log rank test, chi‐square = 21.958, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Embryo banking in women undergoing IVF with POR based on the Bologna criteria reduces CLBR and lengthens TTLB when compared with no embryo banking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10457668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104576682023-08-27 The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria Ge, Qiu Lin Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Ng, Ernest Hung Yu Chen, Zhi Qin Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the time to live birth (TTLB) in poor ovarian responders (POR) according to the Bologna criteria. METHODS: A total of 276 infertile women undergoing IVF with POR were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups with (n = 121) or without (n = 155) embryo banking at the discretion of the attending physicians. A total of 656 and 405 stimulation cycles were started in the two groups respectively during the 24 month follow‐up. RESULTS: The biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rate per transfer were comparable between two groups (p > 0.05). The CLBR was significantly lower in the banking group than in the non‐banking group (31.4% (38/121) and 43.2% (67/151), p < 0.05). TTLB was significantly longer in the banking group (20.5 months vs. 16.0 months, p < 0.001). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of live birth was significantly lower in the banking group compared with the non‐banking group (Log rank test, chi‐square = 21.958, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Embryo banking in women undergoing IVF with POR based on the Bologna criteria reduces CLBR and lengthens TTLB when compared with no embryo banking. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10457668/ /pubmed/37638350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12533 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ge, Qiu Lin Teng, Xiao Ming Chen, Miao Xin Li, Kun Ming Ng, Ernest Hung Yu Chen, Zhi Qin The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria |
title | The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria |
title_full | The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria |
title_fullStr | The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria |
title_short | The impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria |
title_sort | impact of the embryo banking on the cumulative live birth rate in women with poor ovarian response according to the bologna criteria |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37638350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geqiulin theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT tengxiaoming theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT chenmiaoxin theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT likunming theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT ngernesthungyu theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT chenzhiqin theimpactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT geqiulin impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT tengxiaoming impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT chenmiaoxin impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT likunming impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT ngernesthungyu impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria AT chenzhiqin impactoftheembryobankingonthecumulativelivebirthrateinwomenwithpoorovarianresponseaccordingtothebolognacriteria |