Cargando…

Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Glucose-guided eating (GGE) improves metabolic markers of chronic disease risk, including insulin resistance, in adults without diabetes. GGE is a timed eating paradigm that relies on experiencing feelings of hunger and having a preprandial glucose level below a personalized threshold co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jospe, Michelle R, Marano, Kari M, Bedoya, Arianna R, Behrens, Nick L, Cigan, Lacey, Villegas, Vanessa, Magee, Michelle F, Marrero, David G, Richardson, Kelli M, Liao, Yue, Schembre, Susan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37566445
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46034
_version_ 1785096986713653248
author Jospe, Michelle R
Marano, Kari M
Bedoya, Arianna R
Behrens, Nick L
Cigan, Lacey
Villegas, Vanessa
Magee, Michelle F
Marrero, David G
Richardson, Kelli M
Liao, Yue
Schembre, Susan M
author_facet Jospe, Michelle R
Marano, Kari M
Bedoya, Arianna R
Behrens, Nick L
Cigan, Lacey
Villegas, Vanessa
Magee, Michelle F
Marrero, David G
Richardson, Kelli M
Liao, Yue
Schembre, Susan M
author_sort Jospe, Michelle R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glucose-guided eating (GGE) improves metabolic markers of chronic disease risk, including insulin resistance, in adults without diabetes. GGE is a timed eating paradigm that relies on experiencing feelings of hunger and having a preprandial glucose level below a personalized threshold computed from 2 consecutive morning fasting glucose levels. The dawn phenomenon (DP), which results in elevated morning preprandial glucose levels, could cause typically derived GGE thresholds to be unacceptable or ineffective among people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to quantify the incidence and day-to-day variability in the magnitude of DP and examine its effect on morning preprandial glucose levels as a preliminary test of the feasibility of GGE in adults with T2DM. METHODS: Study participants wore a single-blinded Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for up to 10 days. First and last eating times and any overnight eating were reported using daily surveys over the study duration. DP was expressed as a dichotomous variable at the day level (DP day vs non-DP day) and as a continuous variable reflecting the percent of days DP was experienced on a valid day. A valid day was defined as having no reported overnight eating (between midnight and 6 AM). ∂ Glucose was computed as the difference in nocturnal glucose nadir (between midnight and 6 AM) to morning preprandial glucose levels. ∂ Glucose ≥20 mg/dL constituted a DP day. Using multilevel modeling, we examined the between- and within-person effects of DP on morning preprandial glucose and the effect of evening eating times on DP. RESULTS: In total, 21 adults (59% female; 13/21, 62%) with non–insulin-treated T2DM wore a CGM for an average of 10.5 (SD 1.1) days. Twenty out of 21 participants (95%) experienced DP for at least 1 day, with an average of 51% of days (SD 27.2; range 0%-100%). The mean ∂ glucose was 23.7 (SD 13.2) mg/dL. People who experience DP more frequently had a morning preprandial glucose level that was 54.1 (95% CI 17.0-83.9; P<.001) mg/dL higher than those who experienced DP less frequently. For within-person effect, morning preprandial glucose levels were 12.1 (95% CI 6.3-17.8; P=.008) mg/dL higher on a DP day than on a non-DP day. The association between ∂ glucose and preprandial glucose levels was 0.50 (95% CI 0.37-0.60; P<.001). There was no effect of the last eating time on DP. CONCLUSIONS: DP was experienced by most study participants regardless of last eating times. The magnitude of the within-person effect of DP on morning preprandial glucose levels was meaningful in the context of GGE. Alternative approaches for determining acceptable and effective GGE thresholds for people with T2DM should be explored and evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10457696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104576962023-08-27 Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study Jospe, Michelle R Marano, Kari M Bedoya, Arianna R Behrens, Nick L Cigan, Lacey Villegas, Vanessa Magee, Michelle F Marrero, David G Richardson, Kelli M Liao, Yue Schembre, Susan M JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Glucose-guided eating (GGE) improves metabolic markers of chronic disease risk, including insulin resistance, in adults without diabetes. GGE is a timed eating paradigm that relies on experiencing feelings of hunger and having a preprandial glucose level below a personalized threshold computed from 2 consecutive morning fasting glucose levels. The dawn phenomenon (DP), which results in elevated morning preprandial glucose levels, could cause typically derived GGE thresholds to be unacceptable or ineffective among people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to quantify the incidence and day-to-day variability in the magnitude of DP and examine its effect on morning preprandial glucose levels as a preliminary test of the feasibility of GGE in adults with T2DM. METHODS: Study participants wore a single-blinded Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for up to 10 days. First and last eating times and any overnight eating were reported using daily surveys over the study duration. DP was expressed as a dichotomous variable at the day level (DP day vs non-DP day) and as a continuous variable reflecting the percent of days DP was experienced on a valid day. A valid day was defined as having no reported overnight eating (between midnight and 6 AM). ∂ Glucose was computed as the difference in nocturnal glucose nadir (between midnight and 6 AM) to morning preprandial glucose levels. ∂ Glucose ≥20 mg/dL constituted a DP day. Using multilevel modeling, we examined the between- and within-person effects of DP on morning preprandial glucose and the effect of evening eating times on DP. RESULTS: In total, 21 adults (59% female; 13/21, 62%) with non–insulin-treated T2DM wore a CGM for an average of 10.5 (SD 1.1) days. Twenty out of 21 participants (95%) experienced DP for at least 1 day, with an average of 51% of days (SD 27.2; range 0%-100%). The mean ∂ glucose was 23.7 (SD 13.2) mg/dL. People who experience DP more frequently had a morning preprandial glucose level that was 54.1 (95% CI 17.0-83.9; P<.001) mg/dL higher than those who experienced DP less frequently. For within-person effect, morning preprandial glucose levels were 12.1 (95% CI 6.3-17.8; P=.008) mg/dL higher on a DP day than on a non-DP day. The association between ∂ glucose and preprandial glucose levels was 0.50 (95% CI 0.37-0.60; P<.001). There was no effect of the last eating time on DP. CONCLUSIONS: DP was experienced by most study participants regardless of last eating times. The magnitude of the within-person effect of DP on morning preprandial glucose levels was meaningful in the context of GGE. Alternative approaches for determining acceptable and effective GGE thresholds for people with T2DM should be explored and evaluated. JMIR Publications 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10457696/ /pubmed/37566445 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46034 Text en ©Michelle R Jospe, Kari M Marano, Arianna R Bedoya, Nick L Behrens, Lacey Cigan, Vanessa Villegas, Michelle F Magee, David G Marrero, Kelli M Richardson, Yue Liao, Susan M Schembre. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 11.08.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jospe, Michelle R
Marano, Kari M
Bedoya, Arianna R
Behrens, Nick L
Cigan, Lacey
Villegas, Vanessa
Magee, Michelle F
Marrero, David G
Richardson, Kelli M
Liao, Yue
Schembre, Susan M
Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study
title Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study
title_full Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study
title_fullStr Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study
title_short Exploring the Impact of Dawn Phenomenon on Glucose-Guided Eating Thresholds in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Observational Study
title_sort exploring the impact of dawn phenomenon on glucose-guided eating thresholds in individuals with type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring: observational study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37566445
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46034
work_keys_str_mv AT jospemicheller exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT maranokarim exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT bedoyaariannar exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT behrensnickl exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT ciganlacey exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT villegasvanessa exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT mageemichellef exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT marrerodavidg exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT richardsonkellim exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT liaoyue exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy
AT schembresusanm exploringtheimpactofdawnphenomenononglucoseguidedeatingthresholdsinindividualswithtype2diabetesusingcontinuousglucosemonitoringobservationalstudy