Cargando…

The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex

Oxidative stress in soybean plants infected with Diaporthe isolates was evaluated in order to select (1) the least aggressive inoculation method, (2) to determine the most aggressive Diaporthe isolate, and (3) to determine the most tolerant soybean cultivar to this isolate. Based on the present malo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrović, Kristina, Šućur Elez, Jovana, Crnković, Marina, Krsmanović, Slobodan, Rajković, Miloš, Kuzmanović, Boris, Malenčić, Đorđe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162896
_version_ 1785097020974825472
author Petrović, Kristina
Šućur Elez, Jovana
Crnković, Marina
Krsmanović, Slobodan
Rajković, Miloš
Kuzmanović, Boris
Malenčić, Đorđe
author_facet Petrović, Kristina
Šućur Elez, Jovana
Crnković, Marina
Krsmanović, Slobodan
Rajković, Miloš
Kuzmanović, Boris
Malenčić, Đorđe
author_sort Petrović, Kristina
collection PubMed
description Oxidative stress in soybean plants infected with Diaporthe isolates was evaluated in order to select (1) the least aggressive inoculation method, (2) to determine the most aggressive Diaporthe isolate, and (3) to determine the most tolerant soybean cultivar to this isolate. Based on the present malondialdehyde (MDA) content, the main end product of the lipid peroxidation process, and the biomarker for oxidative stress, the mycelium contact method was chosen as the least aggressive inoculation method, compared to the toothpick method and plug method. The activity of the antioxidant enzymes (superoxide–dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (PX)), the reduced glutathione (GSH) content, and the level of lipid peroxidation (LP) were measured in soybean cv. Sava infected by five different Diaporthe species (DPM1F—D. aspalathi, DPC/KR19—D. caulivora, DPC004NY15—D. eres, 18-DIA-SOY-14—D. gulyae, and PL157A—D. longicolla). The most pathogenic Diaporthe species to cv. Sava was D. eres. The screening of the antioxidant enzymes activity in the leaves of 12 different soybean cultivars (Altona, Atlas, Capital, Chico, CX134, Favorit, Lakota, McCall, Morsoy, Strain, Rubin, and Victoria) infected with D. eres by the mycelium contact inoculation method showed that Capital, McCall, and Morsoy were the cultivars with the highest tolerance to D. eres, followed by Chico, Favorit, Lakota, and Rubin. The most sensitive cultivars were Atlas, CX134, Victoria, and Strain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10457839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104578392023-08-27 The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex Petrović, Kristina Šućur Elez, Jovana Crnković, Marina Krsmanović, Slobodan Rajković, Miloš Kuzmanović, Boris Malenčić, Đorđe Plants (Basel) Article Oxidative stress in soybean plants infected with Diaporthe isolates was evaluated in order to select (1) the least aggressive inoculation method, (2) to determine the most aggressive Diaporthe isolate, and (3) to determine the most tolerant soybean cultivar to this isolate. Based on the present malondialdehyde (MDA) content, the main end product of the lipid peroxidation process, and the biomarker for oxidative stress, the mycelium contact method was chosen as the least aggressive inoculation method, compared to the toothpick method and plug method. The activity of the antioxidant enzymes (superoxide–dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (PX)), the reduced glutathione (GSH) content, and the level of lipid peroxidation (LP) were measured in soybean cv. Sava infected by five different Diaporthe species (DPM1F—D. aspalathi, DPC/KR19—D. caulivora, DPC004NY15—D. eres, 18-DIA-SOY-14—D. gulyae, and PL157A—D. longicolla). The most pathogenic Diaporthe species to cv. Sava was D. eres. The screening of the antioxidant enzymes activity in the leaves of 12 different soybean cultivars (Altona, Atlas, Capital, Chico, CX134, Favorit, Lakota, McCall, Morsoy, Strain, Rubin, and Victoria) infected with D. eres by the mycelium contact inoculation method showed that Capital, McCall, and Morsoy were the cultivars with the highest tolerance to D. eres, followed by Chico, Favorit, Lakota, and Rubin. The most sensitive cultivars were Atlas, CX134, Victoria, and Strain. MDPI 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10457839/ /pubmed/37631108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162896 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Petrović, Kristina
Šućur Elez, Jovana
Crnković, Marina
Krsmanović, Slobodan
Rajković, Miloš
Kuzmanović, Boris
Malenčić, Đorđe
The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex
title The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex
title_full The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex
title_fullStr The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex
title_full_unstemmed The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex
title_short The Biochemical Response of Soybean Cultivars Infected by Diaporthe Species Complex
title_sort biochemical response of soybean cultivars infected by diaporthe species complex
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162896
work_keys_str_mv AT petrovickristina thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT sucurelezjovana thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT crnkovicmarina thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT krsmanovicslobodan thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT rajkovicmilos thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT kuzmanovicboris thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT malencicđorđe thebiochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT petrovickristina biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT sucurelezjovana biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT crnkovicmarina biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT krsmanovicslobodan biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT rajkovicmilos biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT kuzmanovicboris biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex
AT malencicđorđe biochemicalresponseofsoybeancultivarsinfectedbydiaporthespeciescomplex