Cargando…
Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercializ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37630529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081971 |
_version_ | 1785097089699545088 |
---|---|
author | Jeannot, Katy Gaillot, Susie Triponney, Pauline Portets, Sylvain Pourchet, Valentin Fournier, Damien Potron, Anaïs |
author_facet | Jeannot, Katy Gaillot, Susie Triponney, Pauline Portets, Sylvain Pourchet, Valentin Fournier, Damien Potron, Anaïs |
author_sort | Jeannot, Katy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP(®), Liofilchem and UMIC(®), Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively) and bias < 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n = 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10458114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104581142023-08-27 Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. Jeannot, Katy Gaillot, Susie Triponney, Pauline Portets, Sylvain Pourchet, Valentin Fournier, Damien Potron, Anaïs Microorganisms Article Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP(®), Liofilchem and UMIC(®), Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively) and bias < 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n = 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10458114/ /pubmed/37630529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081971 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jeannot, Katy Gaillot, Susie Triponney, Pauline Portets, Sylvain Pourchet, Valentin Fournier, Damien Potron, Anaïs Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. |
title | Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. |
title_full | Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. |
title_fullStr | Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. |
title_short | Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. |
title_sort | performance of the disc diffusion method, mts gradient tests and two commercially available microdilution tests for the determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in acinetobacter spp. |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37630529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeannotkaty performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp AT gaillotsusie performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp AT triponneypauline performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp AT portetssylvain performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp AT pourchetvalentin performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp AT fournierdamien performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp AT potronanais performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp |