Cargando…

Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.

Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercializ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeannot, Katy, Gaillot, Susie, Triponney, Pauline, Portets, Sylvain, Pourchet, Valentin, Fournier, Damien, Potron, Anaïs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37630529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081971
_version_ 1785097089699545088
author Jeannot, Katy
Gaillot, Susie
Triponney, Pauline
Portets, Sylvain
Pourchet, Valentin
Fournier, Damien
Potron, Anaïs
author_facet Jeannot, Katy
Gaillot, Susie
Triponney, Pauline
Portets, Sylvain
Pourchet, Valentin
Fournier, Damien
Potron, Anaïs
author_sort Jeannot, Katy
collection PubMed
description Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP(®), Liofilchem and UMIC(®), Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively) and bias < 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n = 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10458114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104581142023-08-27 Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp. Jeannot, Katy Gaillot, Susie Triponney, Pauline Portets, Sylvain Pourchet, Valentin Fournier, Damien Potron, Anaïs Microorganisms Article Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP(®), Liofilchem and UMIC(®), Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively) and bias < 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP(®) and UMIC(®), respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n = 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10458114/ /pubmed/37630529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081971 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jeannot, Katy
Gaillot, Susie
Triponney, Pauline
Portets, Sylvain
Pourchet, Valentin
Fournier, Damien
Potron, Anaïs
Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
title Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
title_full Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
title_fullStr Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
title_short Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.
title_sort performance of the disc diffusion method, mts gradient tests and two commercially available microdilution tests for the determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in acinetobacter spp.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37630529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081971
work_keys_str_mv AT jeannotkaty performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp
AT gaillotsusie performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp
AT triponneypauline performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp
AT portetssylvain performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp
AT pourchetvalentin performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp
AT fournierdamien performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp
AT potronanais performanceofthediscdiffusionmethodmtsgradienttestsandtwocommerciallyavailablemicrodilutiontestsforthedeterminationofcefiderocolsusceptibilityinacinetobacterspp