Cargando…
Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
The term “officinal” derives from the Latin and includes all medicinal, aromatic and perfume plant species, which have long been a subject of interest for multiple purposes: health, food, pharmacological, cosmetic and so on. In this work, a study on six different species of medicinal plants, particu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162900 |
_version_ | 1785097282822078464 |
---|---|
author | Naviglio, Daniele Trifuoggi, Marco Varchetta, Francesca Nebbioso, Viviana Perrone, Angela Avolio, Laura De Martino, Eleonora Montesano, Domenico Gallo, Monica |
author_facet | Naviglio, Daniele Trifuoggi, Marco Varchetta, Francesca Nebbioso, Viviana Perrone, Angela Avolio, Laura De Martino, Eleonora Montesano, Domenico Gallo, Monica |
author_sort | Naviglio, Daniele |
collection | PubMed |
description | The term “officinal” derives from the Latin and includes all medicinal, aromatic and perfume plant species, which have long been a subject of interest for multiple purposes: health, food, pharmacological, cosmetic and so on. In this work, a study on six different species of medicinal plants, particularly characterized by digestive, choleretic and diuretic properties, was carried out: rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), sage (Salvia officinalis), laurel (Laurus nobilis), gentian (Gentiana lutea), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and rhubarb (Rheum palmatum). The roots and aerial parts of plants were separately extracted with two different techniques—maceration and rapid solid–liquid dynamic extraction (RSLDE)—and the quali/quantitative analysis of active ingredients have been determined by applying dry residue, Folin–Ciocalteu and DPPH assays. Data obtained have provided useful answers regarding the efficiency of the extraction carried out on a mixture or on single plants, allowing us to evaluate the best choice according to the cases and the final uses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10458922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104589222023-08-27 Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE Naviglio, Daniele Trifuoggi, Marco Varchetta, Francesca Nebbioso, Viviana Perrone, Angela Avolio, Laura De Martino, Eleonora Montesano, Domenico Gallo, Monica Plants (Basel) Article The term “officinal” derives from the Latin and includes all medicinal, aromatic and perfume plant species, which have long been a subject of interest for multiple purposes: health, food, pharmacological, cosmetic and so on. In this work, a study on six different species of medicinal plants, particularly characterized by digestive, choleretic and diuretic properties, was carried out: rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), sage (Salvia officinalis), laurel (Laurus nobilis), gentian (Gentiana lutea), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and rhubarb (Rheum palmatum). The roots and aerial parts of plants were separately extracted with two different techniques—maceration and rapid solid–liquid dynamic extraction (RSLDE)—and the quali/quantitative analysis of active ingredients have been determined by applying dry residue, Folin–Ciocalteu and DPPH assays. Data obtained have provided useful answers regarding the efficiency of the extraction carried out on a mixture or on single plants, allowing us to evaluate the best choice according to the cases and the final uses. MDPI 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10458922/ /pubmed/37631112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162900 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Naviglio, Daniele Trifuoggi, Marco Varchetta, Francesca Nebbioso, Viviana Perrone, Angela Avolio, Laura De Martino, Eleonora Montesano, Domenico Gallo, Monica Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE |
title | Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE |
title_full | Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE |
title_fullStr | Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE |
title_short | Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE |
title_sort | efficiency of recovery of the bioactive principles of plants by comparison between solid–liquid extraction in mixture and single-vegetable matrices via maceration and rslde |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT navigliodaniele efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT trifuoggimarco efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT varchettafrancesca efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT nebbiosoviviana efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT perroneangela efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT avoliolaura efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT demartinoeleonora efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT montesanodomenico efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde AT gallomonica efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde |