Cargando…

Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE

The term “officinal” derives from the Latin and includes all medicinal, aromatic and perfume plant species, which have long been a subject of interest for multiple purposes: health, food, pharmacological, cosmetic and so on. In this work, a study on six different species of medicinal plants, particu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naviglio, Daniele, Trifuoggi, Marco, Varchetta, Francesca, Nebbioso, Viviana, Perrone, Angela, Avolio, Laura, De Martino, Eleonora, Montesano, Domenico, Gallo, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162900
_version_ 1785097282822078464
author Naviglio, Daniele
Trifuoggi, Marco
Varchetta, Francesca
Nebbioso, Viviana
Perrone, Angela
Avolio, Laura
De Martino, Eleonora
Montesano, Domenico
Gallo, Monica
author_facet Naviglio, Daniele
Trifuoggi, Marco
Varchetta, Francesca
Nebbioso, Viviana
Perrone, Angela
Avolio, Laura
De Martino, Eleonora
Montesano, Domenico
Gallo, Monica
author_sort Naviglio, Daniele
collection PubMed
description The term “officinal” derives from the Latin and includes all medicinal, aromatic and perfume plant species, which have long been a subject of interest for multiple purposes: health, food, pharmacological, cosmetic and so on. In this work, a study on six different species of medicinal plants, particularly characterized by digestive, choleretic and diuretic properties, was carried out: rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), sage (Salvia officinalis), laurel (Laurus nobilis), gentian (Gentiana lutea), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and rhubarb (Rheum palmatum). The roots and aerial parts of plants were separately extracted with two different techniques—maceration and rapid solid–liquid dynamic extraction (RSLDE)—and the quali/quantitative analysis of active ingredients have been determined by applying dry residue, Folin–Ciocalteu and DPPH assays. Data obtained have provided useful answers regarding the efficiency of the extraction carried out on a mixture or on single plants, allowing us to evaluate the best choice according to the cases and the final uses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10458922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104589222023-08-27 Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE Naviglio, Daniele Trifuoggi, Marco Varchetta, Francesca Nebbioso, Viviana Perrone, Angela Avolio, Laura De Martino, Eleonora Montesano, Domenico Gallo, Monica Plants (Basel) Article The term “officinal” derives from the Latin and includes all medicinal, aromatic and perfume plant species, which have long been a subject of interest for multiple purposes: health, food, pharmacological, cosmetic and so on. In this work, a study on six different species of medicinal plants, particularly characterized by digestive, choleretic and diuretic properties, was carried out: rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), sage (Salvia officinalis), laurel (Laurus nobilis), gentian (Gentiana lutea), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and rhubarb (Rheum palmatum). The roots and aerial parts of plants were separately extracted with two different techniques—maceration and rapid solid–liquid dynamic extraction (RSLDE)—and the quali/quantitative analysis of active ingredients have been determined by applying dry residue, Folin–Ciocalteu and DPPH assays. Data obtained have provided useful answers regarding the efficiency of the extraction carried out on a mixture or on single plants, allowing us to evaluate the best choice according to the cases and the final uses. MDPI 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10458922/ /pubmed/37631112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162900 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naviglio, Daniele
Trifuoggi, Marco
Varchetta, Francesca
Nebbioso, Viviana
Perrone, Angela
Avolio, Laura
De Martino, Eleonora
Montesano, Domenico
Gallo, Monica
Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
title Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
title_full Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
title_fullStr Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
title_short Efficiency of Recovery of the Bioactive Principles of Plants by Comparison between Solid–Liquid Extraction in Mixture and Single-Vegetable Matrices via Maceration and RSLDE
title_sort efficiency of recovery of the bioactive principles of plants by comparison between solid–liquid extraction in mixture and single-vegetable matrices via maceration and rslde
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12162900
work_keys_str_mv AT navigliodaniele efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT trifuoggimarco efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT varchettafrancesca efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT nebbiosoviviana efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT perroneangela efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT avoliolaura efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT demartinoeleonora efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT montesanodomenico efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde
AT gallomonica efficiencyofrecoveryofthebioactiveprinciplesofplantsbycomparisonbetweensolidliquidextractioninmixtureandsinglevegetablematricesviamacerationandrslde