Cargando…

Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures

The utilization of a planar poly(1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS) scaffold has been demonstrated as an effective approach for preserving nerve continuity and facilitating nerve regeneration. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of a microfibrous tubular scaffold specifically designed and fabr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cicero, Luca, Puleio, Roberto, Cassata, Giovanni, Cirincione, Roberta, Camarda, Lawrence, Caracappa, Dario, D’Itri, Lorenzo, Licciardi, Mariano, Vigni, Giulio Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398
_version_ 1785097293463027712
author Cicero, Luca
Puleio, Roberto
Cassata, Giovanni
Cirincione, Roberta
Camarda, Lawrence
Caracappa, Dario
D’Itri, Lorenzo
Licciardi, Mariano
Vigni, Giulio Edoardo
author_facet Cicero, Luca
Puleio, Roberto
Cassata, Giovanni
Cirincione, Roberta
Camarda, Lawrence
Caracappa, Dario
D’Itri, Lorenzo
Licciardi, Mariano
Vigni, Giulio Edoardo
author_sort Cicero, Luca
collection PubMed
description The utilization of a planar poly(1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS) scaffold has been demonstrated as an effective approach for preserving nerve continuity and facilitating nerve regeneration. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of a microfibrous tubular scaffold specifically designed and fabricated through electrospinning, utilizing PBS as a biocompatible and biodegradable material. These scaffolds were evaluated as nerve guide conduits in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis, demonstrating both their biodegradability and efficacy in enhancing the reconstruction process over a long-term period (1-year follow-up). Histological assay and electrophysiological evaluation were performed to compare the long-term outcomes following sutureless repair with the microfibrillar wrap to outcomes obtained using traditional suture repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10458963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104589632023-08-27 Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures Cicero, Luca Puleio, Roberto Cassata, Giovanni Cirincione, Roberta Camarda, Lawrence Caracappa, Dario D’Itri, Lorenzo Licciardi, Mariano Vigni, Giulio Edoardo Polymers (Basel) Article The utilization of a planar poly(1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS) scaffold has been demonstrated as an effective approach for preserving nerve continuity and facilitating nerve regeneration. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of a microfibrous tubular scaffold specifically designed and fabricated through electrospinning, utilizing PBS as a biocompatible and biodegradable material. These scaffolds were evaluated as nerve guide conduits in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis, demonstrating both their biodegradability and efficacy in enhancing the reconstruction process over a long-term period (1-year follow-up). Histological assay and electrophysiological evaluation were performed to compare the long-term outcomes following sutureless repair with the microfibrillar wrap to outcomes obtained using traditional suture repair. MDPI 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10458963/ /pubmed/37631456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cicero, Luca
Puleio, Roberto
Cassata, Giovanni
Cirincione, Roberta
Camarda, Lawrence
Caracappa, Dario
D’Itri, Lorenzo
Licciardi, Mariano
Vigni, Giulio Edoardo
Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
title Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
title_full Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
title_fullStr Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
title_short Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
title_sort peripheral nerve regeneration at 1 year: biodegradable polybutylene succinate artificial scaffold vs. conventional epineurial sutures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398
work_keys_str_mv AT ciceroluca peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT puleioroberto peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT cassatagiovanni peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT cirincioneroberta peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT camardalawrence peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT caracappadario peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT ditrilorenzo peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT licciardimariano peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures
AT vignigiulioedoardo peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures