Cargando…
Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures
The utilization of a planar poly(1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS) scaffold has been demonstrated as an effective approach for preserving nerve continuity and facilitating nerve regeneration. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of a microfibrous tubular scaffold specifically designed and fabr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398 |
_version_ | 1785097293463027712 |
---|---|
author | Cicero, Luca Puleio, Roberto Cassata, Giovanni Cirincione, Roberta Camarda, Lawrence Caracappa, Dario D’Itri, Lorenzo Licciardi, Mariano Vigni, Giulio Edoardo |
author_facet | Cicero, Luca Puleio, Roberto Cassata, Giovanni Cirincione, Roberta Camarda, Lawrence Caracappa, Dario D’Itri, Lorenzo Licciardi, Mariano Vigni, Giulio Edoardo |
author_sort | Cicero, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The utilization of a planar poly(1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS) scaffold has been demonstrated as an effective approach for preserving nerve continuity and facilitating nerve regeneration. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of a microfibrous tubular scaffold specifically designed and fabricated through electrospinning, utilizing PBS as a biocompatible and biodegradable material. These scaffolds were evaluated as nerve guide conduits in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis, demonstrating both their biodegradability and efficacy in enhancing the reconstruction process over a long-term period (1-year follow-up). Histological assay and electrophysiological evaluation were performed to compare the long-term outcomes following sutureless repair with the microfibrillar wrap to outcomes obtained using traditional suture repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10458963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104589632023-08-27 Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures Cicero, Luca Puleio, Roberto Cassata, Giovanni Cirincione, Roberta Camarda, Lawrence Caracappa, Dario D’Itri, Lorenzo Licciardi, Mariano Vigni, Giulio Edoardo Polymers (Basel) Article The utilization of a planar poly(1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS) scaffold has been demonstrated as an effective approach for preserving nerve continuity and facilitating nerve regeneration. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of a microfibrous tubular scaffold specifically designed and fabricated through electrospinning, utilizing PBS as a biocompatible and biodegradable material. These scaffolds were evaluated as nerve guide conduits in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis, demonstrating both their biodegradability and efficacy in enhancing the reconstruction process over a long-term period (1-year follow-up). Histological assay and electrophysiological evaluation were performed to compare the long-term outcomes following sutureless repair with the microfibrillar wrap to outcomes obtained using traditional suture repair. MDPI 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10458963/ /pubmed/37631456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cicero, Luca Puleio, Roberto Cassata, Giovanni Cirincione, Roberta Camarda, Lawrence Caracappa, Dario D’Itri, Lorenzo Licciardi, Mariano Vigni, Giulio Edoardo Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures |
title | Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures |
title_full | Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures |
title_fullStr | Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures |
title_full_unstemmed | Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures |
title_short | Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures |
title_sort | peripheral nerve regeneration at 1 year: biodegradable polybutylene succinate artificial scaffold vs. conventional epineurial sutures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciceroluca peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT puleioroberto peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT cassatagiovanni peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT cirincioneroberta peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT camardalawrence peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT caracappadario peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT ditrilorenzo peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT licciardimariano peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures AT vignigiulioedoardo peripheralnerveregenerationat1yearbiodegradablepolybutylenesuccinateartificialscaffoldvsconventionalepineurialsutures |