Cargando…

Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study

Nucleoside analogs GS-441524 and remdesivir (GS-5734) are effective in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). However, no studies have compared the efficacy between antiviral medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered GS-442514 (12.5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosaro, Emma, Pires, Jully, Castillo, Diego, Murphy, Brian G., Reagan, Krystle L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15081680
_version_ 1785097297579737088
author Cosaro, Emma
Pires, Jully
Castillo, Diego
Murphy, Brian G.
Reagan, Krystle L.
author_facet Cosaro, Emma
Pires, Jully
Castillo, Diego
Murphy, Brian G.
Reagan, Krystle L.
author_sort Cosaro, Emma
collection PubMed
description Nucleoside analogs GS-441524 and remdesivir (GS-5734) are effective in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). However, no studies have compared the efficacy between antiviral medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered GS-442514 (12.5–15 mg/kg) compared to orally administered remdesivir (25–30 mg/kg) in a double-blinded non-inferiority trial. Eighteen cats with effusive FIP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either GS-442514 or remdesivir. Cats were treated daily for 12 weeks and evaluated at week 0, 12, and 16. Survival and disease remission at week 16 were compared between groups. Five of 9 (55%) cats treated GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) cats treated with remdesivir survived, with no difference in survival rate (p = 0.2). Remdesivir fulfilled the criteria for non-inferiority with a difference in survival of 22% (90% CI; −13.5–57.5%). Three of the 18 cats died within 48 h of enrollment. Excluding these cats, 5/6 (83%) of the cats treated with GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) of the cats treated with remdesivir survived. These findings suggest that both orally administered GS-441524 and remdesivir are safe and effective anti-viral medications for the treatment of effusive FIP. Further optimization of the first 48 h of treatment is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10458979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104589792023-08-27 Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study Cosaro, Emma Pires, Jully Castillo, Diego Murphy, Brian G. Reagan, Krystle L. Viruses Article Nucleoside analogs GS-441524 and remdesivir (GS-5734) are effective in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). However, no studies have compared the efficacy between antiviral medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered GS-442514 (12.5–15 mg/kg) compared to orally administered remdesivir (25–30 mg/kg) in a double-blinded non-inferiority trial. Eighteen cats with effusive FIP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either GS-442514 or remdesivir. Cats were treated daily for 12 weeks and evaluated at week 0, 12, and 16. Survival and disease remission at week 16 were compared between groups. Five of 9 (55%) cats treated GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) cats treated with remdesivir survived, with no difference in survival rate (p = 0.2). Remdesivir fulfilled the criteria for non-inferiority with a difference in survival of 22% (90% CI; −13.5–57.5%). Three of the 18 cats died within 48 h of enrollment. Excluding these cats, 5/6 (83%) of the cats treated with GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) of the cats treated with remdesivir survived. These findings suggest that both orally administered GS-441524 and remdesivir are safe and effective anti-viral medications for the treatment of effusive FIP. Further optimization of the first 48 h of treatment is needed. MDPI 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10458979/ /pubmed/37632022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15081680 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cosaro, Emma
Pires, Jully
Castillo, Diego
Murphy, Brian G.
Reagan, Krystle L.
Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study
title Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study
title_full Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study
title_short Efficacy of Oral Remdesivir Compared to GS-441524 for Treatment of Cats with Naturally Occurring Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Blinded, Non-Inferiority Study
title_sort efficacy of oral remdesivir compared to gs-441524 for treatment of cats with naturally occurring effusive feline infectious peritonitis: a blinded, non-inferiority study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15081680
work_keys_str_mv AT cosaroemma efficacyoforalremdesivircomparedtogs441524fortreatmentofcatswithnaturallyoccurringeffusivefelineinfectiousperitonitisablindednoninferioritystudy
AT piresjully efficacyoforalremdesivircomparedtogs441524fortreatmentofcatswithnaturallyoccurringeffusivefelineinfectiousperitonitisablindednoninferioritystudy
AT castillodiego efficacyoforalremdesivircomparedtogs441524fortreatmentofcatswithnaturallyoccurringeffusivefelineinfectiousperitonitisablindednoninferioritystudy
AT murphybriang efficacyoforalremdesivircomparedtogs441524fortreatmentofcatswithnaturallyoccurringeffusivefelineinfectiousperitonitisablindednoninferioritystudy
AT reagankrystlel efficacyoforalremdesivircomparedtogs441524fortreatmentofcatswithnaturallyoccurringeffusivefelineinfectiousperitonitisablindednoninferioritystudy