Comprehensive analysis for the immune related biomarkers of platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies. This study aimed to identify biomarkers that were sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents and can be used in immunotherapy and explore the importance of their mechanisms of action. METHODS: RNA-seq profiles and clinicopathological data for OC samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cBioPortal platform, respectively. Platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant OC samples in the TCGA cohort were selected based on the clinical information. RNA-seq data for 70 OC samples withSingle-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and unsupervised clustering were used to classify OC patients from the TCGA cohort into clusters with different proportions of infiltrating immune cells. ESTIMATE analysis was used to assess the immune landscape among clusters. Differential expression, univariate Cox regression, and LASSO regression analyses were performed to construct prognostic model. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlations among immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and risk score, half-maximal drug inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) and risk score. RESULTS: Using ssGSEA and unsupervised clustering, OC samples were divided into two clusters with different immune cell infiltration. Then, 1715 differentially expressed immune-related genes (DEIRGs) were identified between two clusters, 984 differentially expressed platinum-sensitive related genes (DEPSRGs) between 149 platinum-sensitive and 63 platinum-resistant OC samples were identified, and 5384 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between 380 OC and 194 normal samples were detected from the TCGA cohort. Six biomarkers (GMPPB, SRPK1, STC1, PRSS16, HPDL, and SPTSSB) were detected to establish a prognostic model. The OC patients in the TCGA cohort were classified into high- and low-risk groups. The receive operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and demonstrated that the prognostic model performed well with the area under ROC curve (AUC) greater than 0.6. The expressions of 5 ICIs, including CD200, TNFRSF18, CD160, CD200R1, and CD274 (PD-L1), were significantly different between two risk groups, and the risk score was significant negative associated with CTLA4, TNFRSF4, TNFRSF18, and CD274. Moreover, there were significant differences in IC(50) of 10 chemo drugs between two risk groups, patients in the high-risk group could be more resistant to po0tinib, dasatinib, and neratinib. CONCLUSION: In summary, this study constructed a novel prognostic model based on six prognostic biomarkers, including GMPPB, SRPK1, STC1, PRSS16, HPDL, and SPTSSB, which can be utilized for predicting the prognosis of OC patients. These biomarkers were the potential therapeutic targets.