Cargando…

Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Influenza is a respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus, which is highly transmissible in humans. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and test-negative designs (TNDs) to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, João Paulo, Santos, Marlene, Martins, André, Felgueiras, Miguel, Santos, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11081322
_version_ 1785097343366856704
author Martins, João Paulo
Santos, Marlene
Martins, André
Felgueiras, Miguel
Santos, Rui
author_facet Martins, João Paulo
Santos, Marlene
Martins, André
Felgueiras, Miguel
Santos, Rui
author_sort Martins, João Paulo
collection PubMed
description Influenza is a respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus, which is highly transmissible in humans. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and test-negative designs (TNDs) to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza vaccines (SIVs) in humans aged 15 to 64 years. An electronic search to identify all relevant studies was performed. The outcome measure of interest was VE on laboratory-confirmed influenza (any strain). Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for TNDs. The search identified a total of 2993 records, but only 123 studies from 73 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 116 were TNDs. The pooled VE was 48% (95% CI: 42–54) for RCTs, 55.4% (95% CI: 43.2–64.9) when there was a match between the vaccine and most prevalent circulating strains and 39.3% (95% CI: 23.5–51.9) otherwise. The TNDs’ adjusted VE was equal to 39.9% (95% CI: 31–48), 45.1 (95% CI: 38.7–50.8) when there was a match and 35.1 (95% CI: 29.0–40.7) otherwise. The match between strains included in the vaccine and strains in circulation is the most important factor in the VE. It increases by more than 25% when there is a match with the most prevalent circulating strains. The laboratorial method for confirmation of influenza is a possible source of bias when estimating VE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10459161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104591612023-08-27 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Martins, João Paulo Santos, Marlene Martins, André Felgueiras, Miguel Santos, Rui Vaccines (Basel) Systematic Review Influenza is a respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus, which is highly transmissible in humans. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and test-negative designs (TNDs) to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza vaccines (SIVs) in humans aged 15 to 64 years. An electronic search to identify all relevant studies was performed. The outcome measure of interest was VE on laboratory-confirmed influenza (any strain). Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for TNDs. The search identified a total of 2993 records, but only 123 studies from 73 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 116 were TNDs. The pooled VE was 48% (95% CI: 42–54) for RCTs, 55.4% (95% CI: 43.2–64.9) when there was a match between the vaccine and most prevalent circulating strains and 39.3% (95% CI: 23.5–51.9) otherwise. The TNDs’ adjusted VE was equal to 39.9% (95% CI: 31–48), 45.1 (95% CI: 38.7–50.8) when there was a match and 35.1 (95% CI: 29.0–40.7) otherwise. The match between strains included in the vaccine and strains in circulation is the most important factor in the VE. It increases by more than 25% when there is a match with the most prevalent circulating strains. The laboratorial method for confirmation of influenza is a possible source of bias when estimating VE. MDPI 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10459161/ /pubmed/37631889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11081322 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Martins, João Paulo
Santos, Marlene
Martins, André
Felgueiras, Miguel
Santos, Rui
Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15–64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness in persons aged 15–64 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11081322
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsjoaopaulo seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessinpersonsaged1564yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT santosmarlene seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessinpersonsaged1564yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinsandre seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessinpersonsaged1564yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT felgueirasmiguel seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessinpersonsaged1564yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT santosrui seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessinpersonsaged1564yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis