Cargando…
The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place
A three-dimensional motion capture system (MoCap) and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod can be utilised to monitor a variety of dynamic parameters during running. The present investigation was designed to examine the validity of these two systems for determining ground contact times while running in p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167155 |
_version_ | 1785097452043370496 |
---|---|
author | Drobnič, Miha Verdel, Nina Holmberg, Hans-Christer Supej, Matej |
author_facet | Drobnič, Miha Verdel, Nina Holmberg, Hans-Christer Supej, Matej |
author_sort | Drobnič, Miha |
collection | PubMed |
description | A three-dimensional motion capture system (MoCap) and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod can be utilised to monitor a variety of dynamic parameters during running. The present investigation was designed to examine the validity of these two systems for determining ground contact times while running in place by comparing the values obtained with those provided by the bilateral force plate (gold standard). Eleven subjects completed three 20-s runs in place at self-selected rates, starting slowly, continuing at an intermediate pace, and finishing rapidly. The ground contact times obtained with both systems differed significantly from the gold standard at all three rates, as well as for all the rates combined (p < 0.001 in all cases), with the smallest mean bias at the fastest step rate for both (11.5 ± 14.4 ms for MoCap and −81.5 ± 18.4 ms for Garmin). This algorithm was developed for the determination of ground contact times during normal running and was adapted here for the assessment of running in place by the MoCap, which could be one explanation for its lack of validity. In conclusion, the wearables developed for monitoring normal running cannot be assumed to be suitable for determining ground contact times while running in place. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10459607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104596072023-08-27 The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place Drobnič, Miha Verdel, Nina Holmberg, Hans-Christer Supej, Matej Sensors (Basel) Communication A three-dimensional motion capture system (MoCap) and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod can be utilised to monitor a variety of dynamic parameters during running. The present investigation was designed to examine the validity of these two systems for determining ground contact times while running in place by comparing the values obtained with those provided by the bilateral force plate (gold standard). Eleven subjects completed three 20-s runs in place at self-selected rates, starting slowly, continuing at an intermediate pace, and finishing rapidly. The ground contact times obtained with both systems differed significantly from the gold standard at all three rates, as well as for all the rates combined (p < 0.001 in all cases), with the smallest mean bias at the fastest step rate for both (11.5 ± 14.4 ms for MoCap and −81.5 ± 18.4 ms for Garmin). This algorithm was developed for the determination of ground contact times during normal running and was adapted here for the assessment of running in place by the MoCap, which could be one explanation for its lack of validity. In conclusion, the wearables developed for monitoring normal running cannot be assumed to be suitable for determining ground contact times while running in place. MDPI 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10459607/ /pubmed/37631692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167155 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Drobnič, Miha Verdel, Nina Holmberg, Hans-Christer Supej, Matej The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place |
title | The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place |
title_full | The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place |
title_fullStr | The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place |
title_full_unstemmed | The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place |
title_short | The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place |
title_sort | validity of a three-dimensional motion capture system and the garmin running dynamics pod in connection with an assessment of ground contact time while running in place |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drobnicmiha thevalidityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT verdelnina thevalidityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT holmberghanschrister thevalidityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT supejmatej thevalidityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT drobnicmiha validityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT verdelnina validityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT holmberghanschrister validityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace AT supejmatej validityofathreedimensionalmotioncapturesystemandthegarminrunningdynamicspodinconnectionwithanassessmentofgroundcontacttimewhilerunninginplace |