Cargando…

Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection

The gait pattern of exoskeleton control conflicting with the human operator’s (the pilot) intention may cause awkward maneuvering or even injury. Therefore, it has been the focus of many studies to help decide the proper gait operation. However, the timing for the recognization plays a crucial role...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Jun-Ji, Hsu, Che-Kang, Hsu, Wei-Li, Tsao, Tsu-Chin, Wang, Fu-Cheng, Yen, Jia-Yush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631740
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167203
_version_ 1785097463444537344
author Lin, Jun-Ji
Hsu, Che-Kang
Hsu, Wei-Li
Tsao, Tsu-Chin
Wang, Fu-Cheng
Yen, Jia-Yush
author_facet Lin, Jun-Ji
Hsu, Che-Kang
Hsu, Wei-Li
Tsao, Tsu-Chin
Wang, Fu-Cheng
Yen, Jia-Yush
author_sort Lin, Jun-Ji
collection PubMed
description The gait pattern of exoskeleton control conflicting with the human operator’s (the pilot) intention may cause awkward maneuvering or even injury. Therefore, it has been the focus of many studies to help decide the proper gait operation. However, the timing for the recognization plays a crucial role in the operation. The delayed detection of the pilot’s intent can be equally undesirable to the exoskeleton operation. Instead of recognizing the motion, this study examines the possibility of identifying the transition between gaits to achieve in-time detection. This study used the data from IMU sensors for future mobile applications. Furthermore, we tested using two machine learning networks: a linearfFeedforward neural network and a long short-term memory network. The gait data are from five subjects for training and testing. The study results show that: 1. The network can successfully separate the transition period from the motion periods. 2. The detection of gait change from walking to sitting can be as fast as 0.17 s, which is adequate for future control applications. However, detecting the transition from standing to walking can take as long as 1.2 s. 3. This study also find that the network trained for one person can also detect movement changes for different persons without deteriorating the performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10459653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104596532023-08-27 Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection Lin, Jun-Ji Hsu, Che-Kang Hsu, Wei-Li Tsao, Tsu-Chin Wang, Fu-Cheng Yen, Jia-Yush Sensors (Basel) Technical Note The gait pattern of exoskeleton control conflicting with the human operator’s (the pilot) intention may cause awkward maneuvering or even injury. Therefore, it has been the focus of many studies to help decide the proper gait operation. However, the timing for the recognization plays a crucial role in the operation. The delayed detection of the pilot’s intent can be equally undesirable to the exoskeleton operation. Instead of recognizing the motion, this study examines the possibility of identifying the transition between gaits to achieve in-time detection. This study used the data from IMU sensors for future mobile applications. Furthermore, we tested using two machine learning networks: a linearfFeedforward neural network and a long short-term memory network. The gait data are from five subjects for training and testing. The study results show that: 1. The network can successfully separate the transition period from the motion periods. 2. The detection of gait change from walking to sitting can be as fast as 0.17 s, which is adequate for future control applications. However, detecting the transition from standing to walking can take as long as 1.2 s. 3. This study also find that the network trained for one person can also detect movement changes for different persons without deteriorating the performance. MDPI 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10459653/ /pubmed/37631740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167203 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Lin, Jun-Ji
Hsu, Che-Kang
Hsu, Wei-Li
Tsao, Tsu-Chin
Wang, Fu-Cheng
Yen, Jia-Yush
Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection
title Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection
title_full Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection
title_fullStr Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection
title_short Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection
title_sort machine learning for human motion intention detection
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631740
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167203
work_keys_str_mv AT linjunji machinelearningforhumanmotionintentiondetection
AT hsuchekang machinelearningforhumanmotionintentiondetection
AT hsuweili machinelearningforhumanmotionintentiondetection
AT tsaotsuchin machinelearningforhumanmotionintentiondetection
AT wangfucheng machinelearningforhumanmotionintentiondetection
AT yenjiayush machinelearningforhumanmotionintentiondetection