Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience

Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vagner, Michal, Cleather, Daniel John, Olah, Vladan, Vacek, Jan, Stastny, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37624121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports11080141
_version_ 1785097489937858560
author Vagner, Michal
Cleather, Daniel John
Olah, Vladan
Vacek, Jan
Stastny, Petr
author_facet Vagner, Michal
Cleather, Daniel John
Olah, Vladan
Vacek, Jan
Stastny, Petr
author_sort Vagner, Michal
collection PubMed
description Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experience levels. Following PRISMA guidelines, the Web of Science, SportDiscus, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published from January 1982 to May 2022. Normalized kicking values were compared using one-way ANOVA. Eighteen articles included FKs (sample: 113 elite men, 109 sub-elite men, and 46 novices), and twenty-five articles included RKs (sample: 238 elite men, 143 sub-elite men, and 27 novice men). The results indicate that the impact force of the FK were 47% (p < 0.01), 92% (p < 0.01), and 120% (p < 0.01) higher than those of the RK across novice, sub-elite, and elite groups, respectively. Moreover, the maximum foot velocity of the RK was 44% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) higher than that of the FK for the sub-elite and elite groups, respectively. Furthermore, the elite group had 65% (p < 0.01) higher knee extension angular velocity with the RK than with the FK and 138% (p < 0.01) higher hip extension angular velocity with the FK than with the RK. In summary, the findings suggest that the FK is more effective in generating forceful kicks, while the RK has the potential for rapid execution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10459763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104597632023-08-27 A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience Vagner, Michal Cleather, Daniel John Olah, Vladan Vacek, Jan Stastny, Petr Sports (Basel) Review Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experience levels. Following PRISMA guidelines, the Web of Science, SportDiscus, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published from January 1982 to May 2022. Normalized kicking values were compared using one-way ANOVA. Eighteen articles included FKs (sample: 113 elite men, 109 sub-elite men, and 46 novices), and twenty-five articles included RKs (sample: 238 elite men, 143 sub-elite men, and 27 novice men). The results indicate that the impact force of the FK were 47% (p < 0.01), 92% (p < 0.01), and 120% (p < 0.01) higher than those of the RK across novice, sub-elite, and elite groups, respectively. Moreover, the maximum foot velocity of the RK was 44% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) higher than that of the FK for the sub-elite and elite groups, respectively. Furthermore, the elite group had 65% (p < 0.01) higher knee extension angular velocity with the RK than with the FK and 138% (p < 0.01) higher hip extension angular velocity with the FK than with the RK. In summary, the findings suggest that the FK is more effective in generating forceful kicks, while the RK has the potential for rapid execution. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10459763/ /pubmed/37624121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports11080141 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vagner, Michal
Cleather, Daniel John
Olah, Vladan
Vacek, Jan
Stastny, Petr
A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
title A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
title_full A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
title_short A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
title_sort systematic review of dynamic forces and kinematic indicators of front and roundhouse kicks across varied conditions and participant experience
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37624121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports11080141
work_keys_str_mv AT vagnermichal asystematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT cleatherdanieljohn asystematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT olahvladan asystematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT vacekjan asystematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT stastnypetr asystematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT vagnermichal systematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT cleatherdanieljohn systematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT olahvladan systematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT vacekjan systematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience
AT stastnypetr systematicreviewofdynamicforcesandkinematicindicatorsoffrontandroundhousekicksacrossvariedconditionsandparticipantexperience