Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies
Recent advances in genomic technologies have enabled more in-depth study of the oral microbiome. In this study, we compared the amplicons generated by primers targeting different sites of the 16S rRNA gene found in the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD). Six sets of primer targeting V1–V2, V1–V3,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6040071 |
_version_ | 1785097561657311232 |
---|---|
author | Na, Hee Sam Song, Yuri Yu, Yeuni Chung, Jin |
author_facet | Na, Hee Sam Song, Yuri Yu, Yeuni Chung, Jin |
author_sort | Na, Hee Sam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent advances in genomic technologies have enabled more in-depth study of the oral microbiome. In this study, we compared the amplicons generated by primers targeting different sites of the 16S rRNA gene found in the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD). Six sets of primer targeting V1–V2, V1–V3, V3–V4, V4–V5, V5–V7 and V6–V8 regions of 16S rRNA were tested via in silico simulation. Primers targeting the V1–V2, V3–V4, and V4–V5 regions generated more than 90% of the original input sequences. Primers targeting the V1–V2 and V1–V3 regions exhibited a low number of mismatches and unclassified sequences at the taxonomic level, but there were notable discrepancies at the species level. Phylogenetic tree comparisons showed primers targeting the V1–V2 and V3–V4 regions showed performances similar to primers targeting the whole 16s RNA region in terms of separating total oral microbiomes and periodontopathogens. In an analysis of clinical oral samples, V1–V2 primers showed superior performance for identifying more taxa and had better resolution sensitivity for Streptococcus than V3–V4 primers. In conclusion, primers targeting the V1–V2 region of 16S rRNA showed the best performance for oral microbiome studies. In addition, the study demonstrates the need for careful PCR primer selections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10460062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104600622023-08-27 Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies Na, Hee Sam Song, Yuri Yu, Yeuni Chung, Jin Methods Protoc Article Recent advances in genomic technologies have enabled more in-depth study of the oral microbiome. In this study, we compared the amplicons generated by primers targeting different sites of the 16S rRNA gene found in the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD). Six sets of primer targeting V1–V2, V1–V3, V3–V4, V4–V5, V5–V7 and V6–V8 regions of 16S rRNA were tested via in silico simulation. Primers targeting the V1–V2, V3–V4, and V4–V5 regions generated more than 90% of the original input sequences. Primers targeting the V1–V2 and V1–V3 regions exhibited a low number of mismatches and unclassified sequences at the taxonomic level, but there were notable discrepancies at the species level. Phylogenetic tree comparisons showed primers targeting the V1–V2 and V3–V4 regions showed performances similar to primers targeting the whole 16s RNA region in terms of separating total oral microbiomes and periodontopathogens. In an analysis of clinical oral samples, V1–V2 primers showed superior performance for identifying more taxa and had better resolution sensitivity for Streptococcus than V3–V4 primers. In conclusion, primers targeting the V1–V2 region of 16S rRNA showed the best performance for oral microbiome studies. In addition, the study demonstrates the need for careful PCR primer selections. MDPI 2023-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10460062/ /pubmed/37623922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6040071 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Na, Hee Sam Song, Yuri Yu, Yeuni Chung, Jin Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies |
title | Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies |
title_sort | comparative analysis of primers used for 16s rrna gene sequencing in oral microbiome studies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6040071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naheesam comparativeanalysisofprimersusedfor16srrnagenesequencinginoralmicrobiomestudies AT songyuri comparativeanalysisofprimersusedfor16srrnagenesequencinginoralmicrobiomestudies AT yuyeuni comparativeanalysisofprimersusedfor16srrnagenesequencinginoralmicrobiomestudies AT chungjin comparativeanalysisofprimersusedfor16srrnagenesequencinginoralmicrobiomestudies |