Cargando…
Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders
Background A range of diseases affecting the jaw muscles and/or temporomandibular joint are referred to as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Nearly 80% of the general population is affected by TMDs, and 48% of those people have trouble opening their mouths and have painful muscles. Aim To compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42584 |
_version_ | 1785097604387831808 |
---|---|
author | Jha, Awanindra K Gupta, Sweta Sinha, Abhishek Tanna, Medha Priya, Leena Singh, Shailee Gore, Navmi R |
author_facet | Jha, Awanindra K Gupta, Sweta Sinha, Abhishek Tanna, Medha Priya, Leena Singh, Shailee Gore, Navmi R |
author_sort | Jha, Awanindra K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background A range of diseases affecting the jaw muscles and/or temporomandibular joint are referred to as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Nearly 80% of the general population is affected by TMDs, and 48% of those people have trouble opening their mouths and have painful muscles. Aim To compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and microcurrent nerve stimulation (MENS) for the relief of masticatory muscle discomfort. Methods Groups I and II were further separated into two groups of 30 persons each (A and B), as well as subgroups C and D. Subjects in Group I received TENS treatment for 20 minutes at frequencies of 0-5 and 5-5 for subgroups A and B, and with visual analog scale (VAS) scores of 1-5 and 6-10 for subgroups C and D, respectively. Subjects in Group II received MENS for 20 minutes, with subgroups C and D receiving the same frequency and VAS score as subgroups A and B, respectively. All individuals underwent treatment with a comparable frequency and length of time every day for five days. Results For subgroup D treated with MENS, there was a considerable reduction in pain; however, for subgroups A and C, there was a comparable reduction in the VAS score for both groups treated with MENS and TENS therapy. Conclusion Compared to TENS, MENS provides quicker and more effective pain relief. Paresthesia and tingling are two adverse effects of TENS that are not present with MENS. However, MENS and TENS are equally helpful at treating masticatory muscle discomfort that is both acute and chronic, as well as improving mouth opening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10460256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104602562023-08-27 Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders Jha, Awanindra K Gupta, Sweta Sinha, Abhishek Tanna, Medha Priya, Leena Singh, Shailee Gore, Navmi R Cureus Pain Management Background A range of diseases affecting the jaw muscles and/or temporomandibular joint are referred to as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Nearly 80% of the general population is affected by TMDs, and 48% of those people have trouble opening their mouths and have painful muscles. Aim To compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and microcurrent nerve stimulation (MENS) for the relief of masticatory muscle discomfort. Methods Groups I and II were further separated into two groups of 30 persons each (A and B), as well as subgroups C and D. Subjects in Group I received TENS treatment for 20 minutes at frequencies of 0-5 and 5-5 for subgroups A and B, and with visual analog scale (VAS) scores of 1-5 and 6-10 for subgroups C and D, respectively. Subjects in Group II received MENS for 20 minutes, with subgroups C and D receiving the same frequency and VAS score as subgroups A and B, respectively. All individuals underwent treatment with a comparable frequency and length of time every day for five days. Results For subgroup D treated with MENS, there was a considerable reduction in pain; however, for subgroups A and C, there was a comparable reduction in the VAS score for both groups treated with MENS and TENS therapy. Conclusion Compared to TENS, MENS provides quicker and more effective pain relief. Paresthesia and tingling are two adverse effects of TENS that are not present with MENS. However, MENS and TENS are equally helpful at treating masticatory muscle discomfort that is both acute and chronic, as well as improving mouth opening. Cureus 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10460256/ /pubmed/37637545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42584 Text en Copyright © 2023, Jha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Pain Management Jha, Awanindra K Gupta, Sweta Sinha, Abhishek Tanna, Medha Priya, Leena Singh, Shailee Gore, Navmi R Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders |
title | Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders |
title_full | Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders |
title_short | Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders |
title_sort | efficacy of two types of noninvasive nerve stimulation in the management of myofascial pain caused by temporomandibular joint (tmj) disorders |
topic | Pain Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhaawanindrak efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders AT guptasweta efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders AT sinhaabhishek efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders AT tannamedha efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders AT priyaleena efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders AT singhshailee efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders AT gorenavmir efficacyoftwotypesofnoninvasivenervestimulationinthemanagementofmyofascialpaincausedbytemporomandibularjointtmjdisorders |