Cargando…
Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to systematically identify and review the efficacy of pharmacological treatments in men with osteoporosis. METHODS: Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to May 2023 for any randomized controlled trial (RCT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02478-9 |
_version_ | 1785097614889320448 |
---|---|
author | Beaudart, Charlotte Demonceau, Céline Sabico, Shaun Veronese, Nicola Cooper, Cyrus Harvey, Nicholas Fuggle, Nicholas Bruyère, Olivier Rizzoli, René Reginster, Jean-Yves |
author_facet | Beaudart, Charlotte Demonceau, Céline Sabico, Shaun Veronese, Nicola Cooper, Cyrus Harvey, Nicholas Fuggle, Nicholas Bruyère, Olivier Rizzoli, René Reginster, Jean-Yves |
author_sort | Beaudart, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to systematically identify and review the efficacy of pharmacological treatments in men with osteoporosis. METHODS: Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to May 2023 for any randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of osteoporotic treatment on the evolution of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and incidence of fractures of men suffering from primary osteoporosis. If at least two studies used the same pharmacological treatment and evaluated the same outcome, a random effect model meta-analysis was applied to reported pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From the 1,061 studies identified through bibliographic search, 21 RCTs fitted the inclusion criteria. Bisphosphonates (k = 10, n = 2992 men with osteoporosis) improved all three BMD sites compared to placebo; lumbar spine: MD + 4.75% (95% CI 3.45, 6.05); total hip: MD + 2.72% (95% CI 2.06; 3.37); femoral neck: MD + 2.26% (95% CI 1.67; 2.85). Denososumab (k = 2, n = 242), Teriparatide (k = 2, n = 309) and Abaloparatide (k = 2, n = 248) also produced significant improvement of all sites BMD compared to placebo. Romosozumab was only identified in one study and was therefore not meta-analysed. In this study, Romosozumab increased significantly BMD compared to placebo. Incident fractures were reported in 16 RCTs but only four reported fractures as the primary outcome. Treatments were associated with a lower incidence of fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Medications used in the management of osteoporosis in women appear to provide similar benefits in men with osteoporosis. Therefore, the algorithm for the management of osteoporosis in men could be similar to the one previously recommended for the management of osteoporosis in women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-023-02478-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10460304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104603042023-08-28 Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis Beaudart, Charlotte Demonceau, Céline Sabico, Shaun Veronese, Nicola Cooper, Cyrus Harvey, Nicholas Fuggle, Nicholas Bruyère, Olivier Rizzoli, René Reginster, Jean-Yves Aging Clin Exp Res Review INTRODUCTION: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to systematically identify and review the efficacy of pharmacological treatments in men with osteoporosis. METHODS: Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to May 2023 for any randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of osteoporotic treatment on the evolution of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and incidence of fractures of men suffering from primary osteoporosis. If at least two studies used the same pharmacological treatment and evaluated the same outcome, a random effect model meta-analysis was applied to reported pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From the 1,061 studies identified through bibliographic search, 21 RCTs fitted the inclusion criteria. Bisphosphonates (k = 10, n = 2992 men with osteoporosis) improved all three BMD sites compared to placebo; lumbar spine: MD + 4.75% (95% CI 3.45, 6.05); total hip: MD + 2.72% (95% CI 2.06; 3.37); femoral neck: MD + 2.26% (95% CI 1.67; 2.85). Denososumab (k = 2, n = 242), Teriparatide (k = 2, n = 309) and Abaloparatide (k = 2, n = 248) also produced significant improvement of all sites BMD compared to placebo. Romosozumab was only identified in one study and was therefore not meta-analysed. In this study, Romosozumab increased significantly BMD compared to placebo. Incident fractures were reported in 16 RCTs but only four reported fractures as the primary outcome. Treatments were associated with a lower incidence of fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Medications used in the management of osteoporosis in women appear to provide similar benefits in men with osteoporosis. Therefore, the algorithm for the management of osteoporosis in men could be similar to the one previously recommended for the management of osteoporosis in women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-023-02478-9. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10460304/ /pubmed/37400668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02478-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Beaudart, Charlotte Demonceau, Céline Sabico, Shaun Veronese, Nicola Cooper, Cyrus Harvey, Nicholas Fuggle, Nicholas Bruyère, Olivier Rizzoli, René Reginster, Jean-Yves Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02478-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaudartcharlotte efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT demonceauceline efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sabicoshaun efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT veronesenicola efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT coopercyrus efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT harveynicholas efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fugglenicholas efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bruyereolivier efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rizzolirene efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT reginsterjeanyves efficacyofosteoporosispharmacologicaltreatmentsinmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |