Cargando…
Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prognostic models provide evidence‐based predictions and estimates of future outcomes, facilitating decision‐making, patient care, and research. A few of these models have been externally validated, leading to uncertain reliability and generalizability. This study aims to extern...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1433 |
_version_ | 1785097744034037760 |
---|---|
author | Ogero, Morris Ndiritu, John Sarguta, Rachel Tuti, Timothy Akech, Samuel |
author_facet | Ogero, Morris Ndiritu, John Sarguta, Rachel Tuti, Timothy Akech, Samuel |
author_sort | Ogero, Morris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prognostic models provide evidence‐based predictions and estimates of future outcomes, facilitating decision‐making, patient care, and research. A few of these models have been externally validated, leading to uncertain reliability and generalizability. This study aims to externally validate four models to assess their transferability and usefulness in clinical practice. The models include the respiratory index of severity in children (RISC)‐Malawi model and three other models by Lowlavaar et al. METHODS: The study used data from the Clinical Information Network (CIN) to validate the four models where the primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. 163,329 patients met eligibility criteria. Missing data were imputed, and the logistic function was used to compute predicted risk of in‐hospital mortality. Models' discriminatory ability and calibration were determined using area under the curve (AUC), calibration slope, and intercept. RESULTS: The RISC‐Malawi model had 50,669 pneumonia patients who met the eligibility criteria, of which the case‐fatality ratio was 4406 (8.7%). Its AUC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.77−0.78), whereas the calibration slope was 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00 −1.06), and calibration intercept was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77−0.84). Regarding the external validation of Lowlavaar et al. models, 10,782 eligible patients were included, with an in‐hospital mortality rate of 5.3%. The primary model's AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72−0.77), the calibration slope was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71−0.84), and the calibration intercept was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28−0.46). All models markedly underestimated the risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: All externally validated models exhibited either underestimation or overestimation of the risk as judged from calibration statistics. Hence, applying these models with confidence in settings other than their original development context may not be advisable. Our findings strongly suggest the need for recalibrating these model to enhance their generalizability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10460931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104609312023-08-29 Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study Ogero, Morris Ndiritu, John Sarguta, Rachel Tuti, Timothy Akech, Samuel Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prognostic models provide evidence‐based predictions and estimates of future outcomes, facilitating decision‐making, patient care, and research. A few of these models have been externally validated, leading to uncertain reliability and generalizability. This study aims to externally validate four models to assess their transferability and usefulness in clinical practice. The models include the respiratory index of severity in children (RISC)‐Malawi model and three other models by Lowlavaar et al. METHODS: The study used data from the Clinical Information Network (CIN) to validate the four models where the primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. 163,329 patients met eligibility criteria. Missing data were imputed, and the logistic function was used to compute predicted risk of in‐hospital mortality. Models' discriminatory ability and calibration were determined using area under the curve (AUC), calibration slope, and intercept. RESULTS: The RISC‐Malawi model had 50,669 pneumonia patients who met the eligibility criteria, of which the case‐fatality ratio was 4406 (8.7%). Its AUC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.77−0.78), whereas the calibration slope was 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00 −1.06), and calibration intercept was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77−0.84). Regarding the external validation of Lowlavaar et al. models, 10,782 eligible patients were included, with an in‐hospital mortality rate of 5.3%. The primary model's AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72−0.77), the calibration slope was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71−0.84), and the calibration intercept was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28−0.46). All models markedly underestimated the risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: All externally validated models exhibited either underestimation or overestimation of the risk as judged from calibration statistics. Hence, applying these models with confidence in settings other than their original development context may not be advisable. Our findings strongly suggest the need for recalibrating these model to enhance their generalizability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10460931/ /pubmed/37645032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1433 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ogero, Morris Ndiritu, John Sarguta, Rachel Tuti, Timothy Akech, Samuel Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study |
title | Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study |
title_full | Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study |
title_fullStr | Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study |
title_short | Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: An external validation study |
title_sort | pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource‐limited settings: an external validation study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogeromorris pediatricprognosticmodelspredictinginhospitalchildmortalityinresourcelimitedsettingsanexternalvalidationstudy AT ndiritujohn pediatricprognosticmodelspredictinginhospitalchildmortalityinresourcelimitedsettingsanexternalvalidationstudy AT sargutarachel pediatricprognosticmodelspredictinginhospitalchildmortalityinresourcelimitedsettingsanexternalvalidationstudy AT tutitimothy pediatricprognosticmodelspredictinginhospitalchildmortalityinresourcelimitedsettingsanexternalvalidationstudy AT akechsamuel pediatricprognosticmodelspredictinginhospitalchildmortalityinresourcelimitedsettingsanexternalvalidationstudy |